Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Be careful Joe, you don't want to go confusing them with facts. ;-)
You've been had. The GDP number he used for 2002 was incorrect. http://www.bea.gov/briefrm/tables/ebr1.htm |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Be careful Joe, you don't want to go confusing them with facts. ;-) You've been had. The GDP number he used for 2002 was incorrect. http://www.bea.gov/briefrm/tables/ebr1.htm Then you better adjust the debt numbers, also, when you're indexing the GDP to 1996. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then you better adjust the debt numbers, also, when you're indexing the GDP
to 1996. Debt is not production. It is a real, accumulated total. The treasury does not report the debt in adjusted numbers. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Economy Rebounds - Productivity Soars, Jobless Claims Drop | General |