| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hypocrites at See BS
On 4/10/18 12:16 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2018 11:42 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/10/18 11:16 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/10/2018 10:43 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/10/18 10:33 AM, wrote: It turns out they are enforcing the same kind of NDAs that they criticize Trump for, to cover up the activities of Charley Rose. Were those NDAs issued two weeks before a national election in order to hide the hush money payoff and thereby not influence aforementioned election? Wait a minute. If "Stormy" broke the NSA two weeks before a national election in order to influence aforementioned election wouldn't *that* be a crime? The NDA was about an alleged affair, as a private citizen, consensual in nature that happened in 2006. This whole thing is ridiculous. Richard, I have no idea what laws Stormy might have broken, if any. Again, I don't think anyone gives a **** who Trump ****ed, or when. The trip wire is, as is usual in these sorts of cases, the cover-up. But, of course, Trump claims he never ****ed Stormy and "had no knowledge" of his lawyer's payoff for the cover-up or the NDA before they were executed and the cash changed hands. My guess is that Stormy will not face any criminal prosecution on these matters. It is a civil matter, not a criminal matter. For Stormy. For Lawyer Cohen and Client Trump, well, who knows, eh? And let's not forget the $150,000 payment made by a publisher friend of Trump's to another young lady.  My point is that if somehow Stormy the Slut started threatening that she was going public with information about their "affair" just before the election, isn't that blackmail? So, two weeks before the election Trump's lawyer says, "What will it take for you to shut up?" "Oh, a $130K ought to do it." But then, as I recall she started saying (through her lawyer of course) that the NDA wasn't enforceable because Trump didn't sign it and a fake name was used on it.Â* I don't think this is Stormy conspiring.Â* It's her lawyer. I don't care who Trump screwed in the past in consensual relationships. It isn't my lifestyle and I certainly don't condone it but it isn't a crime. Nor is collusion, BTW. You will argue this of course but I think it's a damn shame because as POTUS I think he's doing a good job so far.Â* Just because he's a "pig" in the eyes of you and others should not be judgement of his performance as the president. As always, I think he is the worse president and worst human being to ever hold that high office. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Conservative hypocrites! | ASA | |||
Threaded Mode
