On 4/10/18 11:16 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2018 10:43 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/18 10:33 AM, wrote:
It turns out they are enforcing the same kind of NDAs that they
criticize Trump for, to cover up the activities of Charley Rose.
Were those NDAs issued two weeks before a national election in order
to hide the hush money payoff and thereby not influence aforementioned
election?
Wait a minute.
If "Stormy" broke the NSA two weeks before a national election in order
to influence aforementioned election wouldn't *that* be a crime?
The NDA was about an alleged affair, as a private citizen, consensual in
nature that happened in 2006.
This whole thing is ridiculous.
Richard, I have no idea what laws Stormy might have broken, if any.
Again, I don't think anyone gives a **** who Trump ****ed, or when. The
trip wire is, as is usual in these sorts of cases, the cover-up. But, of
course, Trump claims he never ****ed Stormy and "had no knowledge" of
his lawyer's payoff for the cover-up or the NDA before they were
executed and the cash changed hands.
My guess is that Stormy will not face any criminal prosecution on these
matters. It is a civil matter, not a criminal matter. For Stormy. For
Lawyer Cohen and Client Trump, well, who knows, eh?
And let's not forget the $150,000 payment made by a publisher friend of
Trump's to another young lady.
