| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Sweet
The office of Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, was raided today by
rhe FBI, at the dirextion of the federal prosecutor in new york city. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. |
Sweet
Keyser Söze wrote:
The office of Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, was raided today by rhe FBI, at the dirextion of the federal prosecutor in new york city. That may get a Fed prosecutor in trouble. Lawyer-client confidentially laws. |
Sweet
wrote:
On 10 Apr 2018 11:58:03 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote: The “Culture Change” to which you refer has been brought about because of corporate greed. In the good old days, if you did a decent job for a decent employer, it was likely you would have a work lifetime job with decent benefits like health care and a defined pension so you wouldn’t live like a pauper when you retired. That is hardly the case anymore. Employers for the most part consider employees as disposables, and have cut back on benefits, including a decent pension. Nothing matters more these days than the quarterly results. Those sorts of changes have resulted in the marginalization of many workers and families, especially low earners, who now have to at least partially depend upon the government or...die. Having been intimately involved in that process myself I can say that the thing that changed was the American consumer. They used to appreciate quality and service. Now they are willing to accept marginal quality in a disposable product that they go to a warehouse and take off the shelf themselves to get the lowest price possible. The internet store even eliminated that trip to the warehouse. Of course, at that point nothing had to be local and most likely was going to be sourced from a 3d world country that uses very cheap labor. That became your competition for a job. In my former business we provided service that generally had a rep on site within an hour and a 4 hour total "cycle time" (call received to call closed). The customer simply was not willing to pay for that so they stopped stocking parts, cut back on the number of people and told the customer if they were not willing to pay for a 4 hour cycle time, you will just have to wait. That seemed OK to them if the price was right. You see the same thing everywhere. The customer is simply not willing to pay for the level of service that you get when you had that kind of employee and that level of job security. Yeah, I have seen that happen in the health care claim processing business, among others. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. |
Sweet
Keyser Soze Wrote
What you seem unwilling to accept is the fact that the Trump family, beginning with Donald?s daddy, and including Donald, his sons, his daughter, and his son in law, have a long, long history of being grifters who run shady businesses and to whom bribery, infidelity, and corruption are standard operating procedure. We know pretty much for sure that Trump secretly paid off two women to hide his sexual indiscretions, Posted with my iPad Pro If what you say is true, they should fit right in with the career politicians in DC and elsewhere. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Sweet
justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote What you seem unwilling to accept is the fact that the Trump family, beginning with Donald?s daddy, and including Donald, his sons, his daughter, and his son in law, have a long, long history of being grifters who run shady businesses and to whom bribery, infidelity, and corruption are standard operating procedure. We know pretty much for sure that Trump secretly paid off two women to hide his sexual indiscretions, Posted with my iPad Pro If what you say is true, they should fit right in with the career politicians in DC and elsewhere. At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress. |
Sweet
Kalif Swill guzzles....
"At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. *Unlike* Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? |
Sweet
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. *Unlike* Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. |
Sweet
On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. *Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet |
Sweet
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:46:43 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. *Unlike* Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? 'Inflatitable'? Much better than a missing 't'. |
Sweet
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 6:46:45 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. *Unlike* Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? So you are confused by a missing "t"? You're quite the dol . Eh. |
Sweet
Keyser Soze
On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? |
Sweet
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. *Unlike* Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Yup. He was not in government at the time. But is acknowledged by Congress, that multiple millions of taxpayers money has been used to payoff sexual harassment victims of Congress people. I realize you are stupid, but try to use what brain cells you have left. |
Sweet
Keyser Söze wrote:
True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. *Unlike* Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Neither of you are qualified to comment. |
Sweet
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 8:22:47 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:46:43 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. *Unlike* Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? 'Inflatitable'? Much better than a missing 't'. Bll just used his extra "t". I used the "i". I'm sure drunk janitors find extra letters in the trash all the time. |
Sweet
Tim wrote:
Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? |
Sweet
On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote:
Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's spelling. |
Sweet
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 8:15:34 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the engineer/ Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's spelling. There's that "D'oh" guy again. |
Sweet
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 9:15:34 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's spelling. Many of us see no reason to "update" the meaning of the constitution or the rules that polite society lives by. Nice that you now agree that things don't have to change. "Petar" it is. |
Sweet
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 10:06:55 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 8:15:34 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the engineer/ Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse.. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's spelling. There's that "D'oh" guy again. LOL! |
Sweet
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 19:06:53 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 8:15:34 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Sze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the engineer/ Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean shes gonna blow herself up? My not missed the T, what is Harrys excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a d on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's spelling. There's that "D'oh" guy again. === LOL --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com |
Sweet
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 22:07:41 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote: Your description of Trump family sounds like a sanitized description of the Kennedy family. Which Democrats love. The difference is when they were threatened by a scandal the Kennedys had the woman killed or killed them themselves. |
Sweet
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:46:43 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. *Unlike* Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Trump had no access to tax money at the time. |
Sweet
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 19:13:30 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. *Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet What do you figure she has to offer? She is a blackmailer and might end up in more trouble than Trump if this ends up going that way. She had already shopped this story to other outlets before her lawyer made the buck thirty demand to Cohen. |
Sweet
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's spelling. I doubt it is ever used that way this era. |
Sweet
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:30:35 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? From what I have heard it is up to a million every time she speaks about it. If nothing else comes out of this, I bet we find out more than we wanted to know about the enforceability of NDAs. As I said in the other note CBS was pursuing this too although I doubt they are going to the mat for Charley. They do have other NDAs like most big companies, usually surrounding business practices and intellectual property. If Stormy can invalidate hers, just because she wants to, it will send a shudder down the spine of a lot of companies. |
Sweet
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:27:20 -0700 (PDT), Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 8:22:47 PM UTC-4, John H wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:46:43 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. *Unlike* Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? 'Inflatitable'? Much better than a missing 't'. Bll just used his extra "t". I used the "i". I'm sure drunk janitors find extra letters in the trash all the time. I'm thinking he found a used blow-up doll in the trash. |
Sweet
|
Sweet
The John flushes his head....
"I'm thinking he found a used blow-up doll in the trash." Threw yours away, eh? I'm guessing that even that wasn't helping your problem anymore. Sad! |
Sweet
Tim Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 8:15:34 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Sze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the engineer/ Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she?s gonna blow herself up? My ?not? missed the T, what is Harry?s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a ?d? on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's spelling. There's that "D'oh" guy again. Gat Harry learned the word D'oh from his half brother. Half brother often said " D'oh, who's my daddy?". -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Sweet
Bill Wrote in message:
Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Sze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she?s gonna blow herself up? My ?not? missed the T, what is Harry?s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a ?d? on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's spelling. I doubt it is ever used that way this era. Shakespeare didn't have a spell checker. There's no sense in perpetuating an error. :-) -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Sweet
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 22:07:41 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Your description of Trump family sounds like a sanitized description of the Kennedy family. Which Democrats love. The difference is when they were threatened by a scandal the Kennedys had the woman killed or killed them themselves. Rumor has it the Clintons are of like mindset. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Sweet
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 07:39:45 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 4/11/2018 12:55 AM, wrote: On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:30:35 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? From what I have heard it is up to a million every time she speaks about it. If nothing else comes out of this, I bet we find out more than we wanted to know about the enforceability of NDAs. As I said in the other note CBS was pursuing this too although I doubt they are going to the mat for Charley. They do have other NDAs like most big companies, usually surrounding business practices and intellectual property. If Stormy can invalidate hers, just because she wants to, it will send a shudder down the spine of a lot of companies. We had NDAs for some people at the company I had that were designed to protect intellectual property and other proprietary company information. I only had to enforce it once. We had a sales guy who's responsibility was to coordinate the generation of technical proposals by the engineering department and our price bid for contracts and present them to the customer. At one point we had submitted a proposal for a major contract and the sales person suddenly left the company to join a competitor. I knew the president of the competitor ... we actually were friends from past mutual employments ... and when I found out that he was bidding on the same contract I called foul. When I told him that I had a copy of our proposal with our price, signed by his new salesman, he said he'd get back to me. He did, within an hour, apologized and told me he had withdrawn his bid for the contract. It was so blatant that I didn't even need to get lawyers involved. That is why we should be taking this stormy thing seriously. If she can get away with breaking her NDA with no consequences it might create a precedent that actually affects something important. IBM had a blanket NDA that you signed but until you got up into plant level hardware support most guys did not really have any sensitive material beyond inventories and customer lists. When I got the source code listings for the microcode in the 4300s and other related docs, I had to sign another, more specific NDA. They also tried to enforce a no compete on the guys who were separated with a "package" but that did not survive a challenge. |
Sweet
On 4/11/2018 10:55 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 07:39:45 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 4/11/2018 12:55 AM, wrote: On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:30:35 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? From what I have heard it is up to a million every time she speaks about it. If nothing else comes out of this, I bet we find out more than we wanted to know about the enforceability of NDAs. As I said in the other note CBS was pursuing this too although I doubt they are going to the mat for Charley. They do have other NDAs like most big companies, usually surrounding business practices and intellectual property. If Stormy can invalidate hers, just because she wants to, it will send a shudder down the spine of a lot of companies. We had NDAs for some people at the company I had that were designed to protect intellectual property and other proprietary company information. I only had to enforce it once. We had a sales guy who's responsibility was to coordinate the generation of technical proposals by the engineering department and our price bid for contracts and present them to the customer. At one point we had submitted a proposal for a major contract and the sales person suddenly left the company to join a competitor. I knew the president of the competitor ... we actually were friends from past mutual employments ... and when I found out that he was bidding on the same contract I called foul. When I told him that I had a copy of our proposal with our price, signed by his new salesman, he said he'd get back to me. He did, within an hour, apologized and told me he had withdrawn his bid for the contract. It was so blatant that I didn't even need to get lawyers involved. That is why we should be taking this stormy thing seriously. If she can get away with breaking her NDA with no consequences it might create a precedent that actually affects something important. IBM had a blanket NDA that you signed but until you got up into plant level hardware support most guys did not really have any sensitive material beyond inventories and customer lists. When I got the source code listings for the microcode in the 4300s and other related docs, I had to sign another, more specific NDA. They also tried to enforce a no compete on the guys who were separated with a "package" but that did not survive a challenge. Most enforceable business NDAs have a time period that they remain in force should you leave the company. Usually it's a year. |
Sweet
Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's spelling. I doubt it is ever used that way this era. I guess we can justify any misspelling as was used that way at some time and location. |
Sweet
Bill
- show quoted text - I guess we can justify any misspelling as was used that way at some time and location. ,,,,,,,, Like Harry’s use of “enginer” instead of “engineer” |
Sweet
On 4/11/18 10:55 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 07:39:45 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 4/11/2018 12:55 AM, wrote: On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:30:35 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? From what I have heard it is up to a million every time she speaks about it. If nothing else comes out of this, I bet we find out more than we wanted to know about the enforceability of NDAs. As I said in the other note CBS was pursuing this too although I doubt they are going to the mat for Charley. They do have other NDAs like most big companies, usually surrounding business practices and intellectual property. If Stormy can invalidate hers, just because she wants to, it will send a shudder down the spine of a lot of companies. We had NDAs for some people at the company I had that were designed to protect intellectual property and other proprietary company information. I only had to enforce it once. We had a sales guy who's responsibility was to coordinate the generation of technical proposals by the engineering department and our price bid for contracts and present them to the customer. At one point we had submitted a proposal for a major contract and the sales person suddenly left the company to join a competitor. I knew the president of the competitor ... we actually were friends from past mutual employments ... and when I found out that he was bidding on the same contract I called foul. When I told him that I had a copy of our proposal with our price, signed by his new salesman, he said he'd get back to me. He did, within an hour, apologized and told me he had withdrawn his bid for the contract. It was so blatant that I didn't even need to get lawyers involved. That is why we should be taking this stormy thing seriously. If she can get away with breaking her NDA with no consequences it might create a precedent that actually affects something important. IBM had a blanket NDA that you signed but until you got up into plant level hardware support most guys did not really have any sensitive material beyond inventories and customer lists. When I got the source code listings for the microcode in the 4300s and other related docs, I had to sign another, more specific NDA. They also tried to enforce a no compete on the guys who were separated with a "package" but that did not survive a challenge. Yawn, yawn, and yawn. You seem overly concerned about Ms. Daniels and the Trump NDA. There are major questions about the legality of that NDA, and I really doubt Ms. Daniels will face any consequences. But Trump will. :) |
Sweet
True North wrote:
The John flushes his head.... "I'm thinking he found a used blow-up doll in the trash." Threw yours away, eh? I'm guessing that even that wasn't helping your problem anymore. Sad! So you did keep a ‘ inflatitable’ doll. Odd that it was Canadian and you accuse John of being the owner. |
Sweet
On 4/11/18 11:58 AM, Bill wrote:
Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's spelling. I doubt it is ever used that way this era. I guess we can justify any misspelling as was used that way at some time and location. Misspelling? Now that is revealing. You, someone barely literate, is accusing Shakespeare of not knowing his native tongue. Well, Bilious, *lots* of words were spelled differently in those days. Petar, and later petard, were derived from a French word with a totally different meaning than how the word petard is used today. Shakespeare and his predecessors and contemporaries lived in times a lot closer to the "importation" of many words. You'd have a miserable time with Chaucer, another giant of English literature. |
Sweet
On 4/11/2018 12:12 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 10:55 AM, wrote: On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 07:39:45 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 4/11/2018 12:55 AM, wrote: On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:30:35 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Tim wrote: Keyser Soze On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: True North wrote: Kalif Swill guzzles.... "At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike Congress." Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"? Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors. *** "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar." Hamlet ////// Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up? My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse.** Not enough money to buy a spell checker?* I assume you required a “d” on petar. Sure she is cooperating, no choice.** When is she going to have to return the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement? * From what I have heard it is up to a million every time she speaks about it. If nothing else comes out of this, I bet we find out more than we wanted to know about the enforceability of NDAs. As I said in the other note CBS was pursuing this too although I doubt they are going to the mat for Charley. They do have other NDAs like most big companies, usually surrounding business practices and intellectual property. If Stormy can invalidate hers, just because she wants to, it will send a shudder down the spine of a lot of companies. We had NDAs for some people at the company I had that were designed to protect intellectual property and other proprietary company information. I only had to enforce it once.* We had a sales guy who's responsibility was to coordinate the generation of technical proposals by the engineering department and our price bid for contracts and present them to the customer.* At one point we had submitted a proposal for a major contract and the sales person suddenly left the company to join a competitor.* I knew the president of the competitor ... we actually were friends from past mutual employments ... and when I found out that he was bidding on the same contract I called foul.* When I told him that I had a copy of our proposal with our price, signed by his new salesman, he said he'd get back to me.** He did, within an hour, apologized and told me he had withdrawn his bid for the contract. It was so blatant that I didn't even need to get lawyers involved. That is why we should be taking this stormy thing seriously. If she can get away with breaking her NDA with no consequences it might create a precedent that actually affects something important. IBM had a blanket NDA that you signed but until you got up into plant level hardware support most guys did not really have any sensitive material beyond inventories and customer lists. When I got the source code listings for the microcode in the 4300s and other related docs, I had to sign another, more specific NDA. They also tried to enforce a no compete on the guys who were separated with a "package" but that did not survive a challenge. Yawn, yawn, and yawn. You seem overly concerned about Ms. Daniels and the Trump NDA. There are major questions about the legality of that NDA, and I really doubt Ms. Daniels will face any consequences. But Trump will.* :) Stormy is the ultimate gold digger. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:02 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com