On 4/11/18 12:31 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 12:12 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 10:55 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 07:39:45 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/11/2018 12:55 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:30:35 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote:

Tim wrote:
Keyser Soze
On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles....

"At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo.
Unlike
Congress."


Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"?


Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker


Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal
prosecutors.
Â*Â*Â* "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own
petar."
Hamlet

//////


Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up?


My “notâ€� missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse.Â*Â* Not enough money
to buy a
spell checker?Â* I assume you required a “dâ€� on petar.
Sure she is cooperating, no choice.Â*Â* When is she going to have to
return
the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement?

Â* From what I have heard it is up to a million every time she speaks
about it. If nothing else comes out of this, I bet we find out more
than we wanted to know about the enforceability of NDAs.
As I said in the other note CBS was pursuing this too although I doubt
they are going to the mat for Charley. They do have other NDAs like
most big companies, usually surrounding business practices and
intellectual property. If Stormy can invalidate hers, just because she
wants to, it will send a shudder down the spine of a lot of companies.



We had NDAs for some people at the company I had that were designed to
protect intellectual property and other proprietary company
information.

I only had to enforce it once.Â* We had a sales guy who's responsibility
was to coordinate the generation of technical proposals by the
engineering department and our price bid for contracts and present them
to the customer.Â* At one point we had submitted a proposal for a major
contract and the sales person suddenly left the company to join a
competitor.Â* I knew the president of the competitor ... we actually
were
friends from past mutual employments ... and when I found out that he
was bidding on the same contract I called foul.Â* When I told him that I
had a copy of our proposal with our price, signed by his new salesman,
he said he'd get back to me.Â*Â* He did, within an hour, apologized and
told me he had withdrawn his bid for the contract.

It was so blatant that I didn't even need to get lawyers involved.

That is why we should be taking this stormy thing seriously. If she
can get away with breaking her NDA with no consequences it might
create a precedent that actually affects something important.
IBM had a blanket NDA that you signed but until you got up into plant
level hardware support most guys did not really have any sensitive
material beyond inventories and customer lists.
When I got the source code listings for the microcode in the 4300s and
other related docs, I had to sign another, more specific NDA. They
also tried to enforce a no compete on the guys who were separated with
a "package" but that did not survive a challenge.



Yawn, yawn, and yawn. You seem overly concerned about Ms. Daniels and
the Trump NDA. There are major questions about the legality of that
NDA, and I really doubt Ms. Daniels will face any consequences. But
Trump will.Â*


Stormy is the ultimate gold digger.




I don't get the animus towards Ms. Daniels. She is what she is, and she
is perfectly straightforward about it. This differentiates her from
Trump, who tries to hide the fact that he is a grifter, and who pretends
to be the proper candidate for evangelical christians to support
politically.

Trump has spent a lifetime screwing people. In her own way, so has Ms.
Daniels, but at least she isn't hypocritical about it.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 11:58 AM, Bill wrote:
Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote:
Tim wrote:
Keyser Soze
On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles....

"At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike
Congress."


Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"?


Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker


Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors.
"For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar."
Hamlet

//////


Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up?


My “not� missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a
spell checker? I assume you required a “d� on petar.
Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return
the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement?


D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the
archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's
spelling.


I doubt it is ever used that way this era.



I guess we can justify any misspelling as was used that way at some time
and location.



Misspelling? Now that is revealing. You, someone barely literate, is
accusing Shakespeare of not knowing his native tongue. Well, Bilious,
*lots* of words were spelled differently in those days. Petar, and later
petard, were derived from a French word with a totally different meaning
than how the word petard is used today. Shakespeare and his predecessors
and contemporaries lived in times a lot closer to the "importation" of
many words. You'd have a miserable time with Chaucer, another giant of
English literature.


And using Shakespeare’s spelling is incorrect for modern usage according to
your dribble. Hell, I had a miserable time with some of Shakespeare’s
works. Mid summer nights dream, may be high literature, but came across
as stupid and boring.

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 05:15:30 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

The John flushes his head....

"I'm thinking he found a used blow-up doll in the trash."


Threw yours away, eh? I'm guessing that even that wasn't helping your problem anymore. Sad!

Never had one. The one you got didn't belong to me.

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:25:47 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 4/11/18 11:58 AM, Bill wrote:
Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote:
Tim wrote:
Keyser Soze
On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles....

"At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike
Congress."


Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"?


Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker


Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors.
"For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar."
Hamlet

//////


Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up?


My “not” missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a
spell checker? I assume you required a “d” on petar.
Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return
the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement?


D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the
archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's
spelling.


I doubt it is ever used that way this era.



I guess we can justify any misspelling as was used that way at some time
and location.



Misspelling? Now that is revealing. You, someone barely literate, is
accusing Shakespeare of not knowing his native tongue. Well, Bilious,
*lots* of words were spelled differently in those days. Petar, and later
petard, were derived from a French word with a totally different meaning
than how the word petard is used today. Shakespeare and his predecessors
and contemporaries lived in times a lot closer to the "importation" of
many words. You'd have a miserable time with Chaucer, another giant of
English literature.

He couldn't spell either?

On 4/11/18 1:13 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 11:58 AM, Bill wrote:
Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/18 8:30 PM, Bill wrote:
Tim wrote:
Keyser Soze
On 4/10/18 7:02 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles....

"At least he did no use taxpayer money to pay off the bimbo. Unlike
Congress."


Are you sure "he did no use taxpayer money"?


Bilious bought the cheap spellchecker


Oh, and speaking of Stormy...she's cooperating with federal prosecutors.
"For 'tis the sport to have the enginer / Hoist with his own petar."
Hamlet

//////


Does that mean she’s gonna blow herself up?


My “not� missed the T, what is Harry’s excuse. Not enough money to buy a
spell checker? I assume you required a “d� on petar.
Sure she is cooperating, no choice. When is she going to have to return
the $130 large for breaking the legal agreement?


D'oh. "Petar" is the way Shakespeare spelled the word. It is for us the
archaic spelling of the word. I see no reason to update Shakespeare's
spelling.


I doubt it is ever used that way this era.



I guess we can justify any misspelling as was used that way at some time
and location.



Misspelling? Now that is revealing. You, someone barely literate, is
accusing Shakespeare of not knowing his native tongue. Well, Bilious,
*lots* of words were spelled differently in those days. Petar, and later
petard, were derived from a French word with a totally different meaning
than how the word petard is used today. Shakespeare and his predecessors
and contemporaries lived in times a lot closer to the "importation" of
many words. You'd have a miserable time with Chaucer, another giant of
English literature.


And using Shakespeare’s spelling is incorrect for modern usage according to
your dribble. Hell, I had a miserable time with some of Shakespeare’s
works. Mid summer nights dream, may be high literature, but came across
as stupid and boring.


It is easy to imagine what someone like Shakespeare would think of your
literary droolings. So, you wouldn't have done well in the "Shakespeare
Rapid Reading" course I took to fulfill one of my undergrad majors...

Oh...I wasn't using "modern usage." I was quoting Shakespeare directly
from a quarto, specifically a copy of this:



THE Tragicall Historie of HAMLET
Prince of Denmarke
By William Shakespeare.
As it hath beene diuerse times acted by his Highnesse seruants in the
Cittie of London: as also in the two Vniuersities of Cambridge and
Oxford, and elsewhere
At London printed for N.L. and Iohn Trundell.
1603.

THE Tragicall Historie of HAMLET
Prince of Denmarke
By William Shakespeare.
As it hath beene diuerse times acted by his Highnesse seruants in the
Cittie of London: as also in the two Vniuersities of Cambridge and
Oxford, and elsewhere
At London printed for N.L. and Iohn Trundell.
1603.

.......,,,,,,,,

No problem reading that copy. Why didn’t you post his supposed original handwriting? Would have at least been sort of a challenge

On 4/11/18 2:26 PM, Tim wrote:


THE Tragicall Historie of HAMLET
Prince of Denmarke
By William Shakespeare.
As it hath beene diuerse times acted by his Highnesse seruants in the
Cittie of London: as also in the two Vniuersities of Cambridge and
Oxford, and elsewhere
At London printed for N.L. and Iohn Trundell.
1603.

......,,,,,,,,

No problem reading that copy. Why didn’t you post his supposed original handwriting? Would have at least been sort of a challenge


Why would I do that? The folios were printed. I'd love to own a real
example of something in Shakespeare's own hand, but these are extremely
rare. There are copies of some of the handwritten documents on-line,
though.

I do have a "musick book" from the late 17th Century, but it also was
professionally printed. Last time I checked, it was fairly valuable.

Tim wrote:


THE Tragicall Historie of HAMLET
Prince of Denmarke
By William Shakespeare.
As it hath beene diuerse times acted by his Highnesse seruants in the
Cittie of London: as also in the two Vniuersities of Cambridge and
Oxford, and elsewhere
At London printed for N.L. and Iohn Trundell.
1603.

......,,,,,,,,

No problem reading that copy. Why didn’t you post his supposed original
handwriting? Would have at least been sort of a challenge


No problem comprehending the writing. Spelling suck for 21st century.

On 4/11/18 3:57 PM, Bill wrote:
Tim wrote:


THE Tragicall Historie of HAMLET
Prince of Denmarke
By William Shakespeare.
As it hath beene diuerse times acted by his Highnesse seruants in the
Cittie of London: as also in the two Vniuersities of Cambridge and
Oxford, and elsewhere
At London printed for N.L. and Iohn Trundell.
1603.

......,,,,,,,,

No problem reading that copy. Why didn’t you post his supposed original
handwriting? Would have at least been sort of a challenge


No problem comprehending the writing. Spelling suck for 21st century.


Indeed, your spelling does suck for this or any other century.
Shakespeare, however, is an immortal.

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/11/18 3:57 PM, Bill wrote:
Tim wrote:


THE Tragicall Historie of HAMLET
Prince of Denmarke
By William Shakespeare.
As it hath beene diuerse times acted by his Highnesse seruants in the
Cittie of London: as also in the two Vniuersities of Cambridge and
Oxford, and elsewhere
At London printed for N.L. and Iohn Trundell.
1603.

......,,,,,,,,

No problem reading that copy. Why didn’t you post his supposed original
handwriting? Would have at least been sort of a challenge


No problem comprehending the writing. Spelling suck for 21st century.


Indeed, your spelling does suck for this or any other century.
Shakespeare, however, is an immortal.


Time will tell on the immortal side. I do not seem to make any more typos
than a guy with an “advanced�degree in English.