| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:22:57 -0500, John H.
wrote: I'm glad to see 'barrel shroud' is included as a no-no. Those things are definitely dangerous to others! === I suppose there might actually be some rationale to it. Touching an unshrouded barrel in a rapid fire situation could definitely be hazardous to your hand. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:58:08 -0500, wrote:
On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:22:57 -0500, John H. wrote: I'm glad to see 'barrel shroud' is included as a no-no. Those things are definitely dangerous to others! === I suppose there might actually be some rationale to it. Touching an unshrouded barrel in a rapid fire situation could definitely be hazardous to your hand. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com You're right. We wouldn't want the shooter to get a blister on his hand. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:58:08 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:22:57 -0500, John H. wrote: I'm glad to see 'barrel shroud' is included as a no-no. Those things are definitely dangerous to others! === I suppose there might actually be some rationale to it. Touching an unshrouded barrel in a rapid fire situation could definitely be hazardous to your hand. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com You're right. We wouldn't want the shooter to get a blister on his hand. I thing that was a problem with the old Henry rifle. Maybe was the Sharps rifle. 1800’s. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 19:38:39 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote:
John H. wrote: On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:58:08 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:22:57 -0500, John H. wrote: I'm glad to see 'barrel shroud' is included as a no-no. Those things are definitely dangerous to others! === I suppose there might actually be some rationale to it. Touching an unshrouded barrel in a rapid fire situation could definitely be hazardous to your hand. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com You're right. We wouldn't want the shooter to get a blister on his hand. I thing that was a problem with the old Henry rifle. Maybe was the Sharps rifle. 1800’s. So what was the bottom line with your gas tank? Did I miss it? |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 19:38:39 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:58:08 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:22:57 -0500, John H. wrote: I'm glad to see 'barrel shroud' is included as a no-no. Those things are definitely dangerous to others! === I suppose there might actually be some rationale to it. Touching an unshrouded barrel in a rapid fire situation could definitely be hazardous to your hand. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com You're right. We wouldn't want the shooter to get a blister on his hand. I thing that was a problem with the old Henry rifle. Maybe was the Sharps rifle. 1800’s. So what was the bottom line with your gas tank? Did I miss it? Had a few gallons of water. Will pull the floor after the present storms finish. Cold and wet and windy. Snow level 1500’. I live at about 450’. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 19:38:39 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:58:08 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:22:57 -0500, John H. wrote: I'm glad to see 'barrel shroud' is included as a no-no. Those things are definitely dangerous to others! === I suppose there might actually be some rationale to it. Touching an unshrouded barrel in a rapid fire situation could definitely be hazardous to your hand. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com You're right. We wouldn't want the shooter to get a blister on his hand. I thing that was a problem with the old Henry rifle. Maybe was the Sharps rifle. 1800’s. The rate of fire may not have been fast enough in anything but a military situation to cause a problem. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| What guns would be banned: | General | |||
| Feinstein's list of banned guns... | General | |||
| A list of failures longer than a list of accomplishments... | General | |||
| now banned.. | General | |||