Joe Parsons wrote:

I did not post all the text concerning the award. Since it's so readily
available, it seemed redundant.

Guess not.

In this case you provided a list which you described as the "specific
criteria" and concluded with the statement that "Friendly fire ... is
explicitly included in the criteria" when it was singularly absent.

Just a nit really but "explicit" does mean something more than just
being one of those clever little words that set a tone. It means: fully
revealed or expressed without vagueness, implication, or ambiguity.

Rick

On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 06:07:55 GMT, Rick wrote:

Joe Parsons wrote:

I did not post all the text concerning the award. Since it's so readily
available, it seemed redundant.

Guess not.

In this case you provided a list which you described as the "specific
criteria" and concluded with the statement that "Friendly fire ... is
explicitly included in the criteria" when it was singularly absent.

Just a nit really but "explicit" does mean something more than just
being one of those clever little words that set a tone. It means: fully
revealed or expressed without vagueness, implication, or ambiguity.

Point taken.

Joe Parsons