Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#71
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/27/2018 12:05 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/27/2018 12:36 PM, amdx wrote: On 2/26/2018 10:42 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2018 11:28 AM, amdx wrote: On 2/25/2018 9:33 PM, wrote: I am really serious about cutting the cord. My wife says after the olympics but that was today. I am already transitioning to streaming, I am working my way through the Amazon Prime documentaries They have just about anything that PBS ever aired. I talked about the American Experience show about the MLK assassination the other day. Today I am watching Frontline season 27 ep 8. This is contemporary with the 2009 crash and it is pretty interesting, carving through some of the myths we may have. Â*Â*The Firestick has a great interface, very easy to use. Â*Â*I have added Terrarium TV on my Firestick. This has all the TV shows you would want. https://troypoint.com/install-terrar...fire-tv-stick/ Â*Â*I have also added Mobdro Mobdro has many, many networks and TV stations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWip-rgCjmc Kodi can also be installed on your Firestick. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQogjnEqLhs I have not put Kodi on mine but I have a buddy that uses it. I did use Kodi when I used a Raspberry pi for streaming. I have not used any of the Prime videos, as there is so much available on the apps I posted. Also, a program called Real Debrid, https://real-debrid.com/ Â*Â*It's not needed and has a small cost but it picks the sources that will give you the best sources to stream from automatically, without you picking from a list. Also picks the 1040p and 4k streams. Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Â*Â* Mikek "Cutting the cord"Â* (meaning cable/internet service) and going to streaming still requires a relatively fast internet service, does it not?Â* What service would you use? Â*Â*I have 30Mbps and I don't have any problems, but I also don't have any other demands on the service, while I'm streaming. Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Mikek 30 Mbps is fine for streaming HD video, even with other devices connected.Â* What service do you have for Internet? I have Wow, but Comcast is available, they both have excellent cable service, work consistently. But, I suspect like all cable companies, if you need personal care, good luck. Mikek |
#72
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#74
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/27/2018 1:12 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:55:41 -0600, amdx wrote: On 2/26/2018 12:55 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:46:05 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:34:48 -0500, John H. wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:26:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2018 11:18 AM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:00:25 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2018 7:48 AM, justan wrote: "Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message: On 2/25/2018 10:33 PM, wrote: I am really serious about cutting the cord. My wife says after the olympics but that was today. I am already transitioning to streaming, I am working my way through the Amazon Prime documentaries They have just about anything that PBS ever aired. I talked about the American Experience show about the MLK assassination the other day. Today I am watching Frontline season 27 ep 8. This is contemporary with the 2009 crash and it is pretty interesting, carving through some of the myths we may have. I occasionally watch something from Amazon Prime's inventory. My large HD TV is not "smart" (connected to the Internet) so I use the Sony PS4 to stream stuff from Amazon. Their prime account entitles you to many movies and archived shows as you mention for free. I can also access Hulu, Netfix and other sources but I don't watch enough to bother with them. Smart tvs are cheap nowadays. I paid 800 for a 60 inch smart plasma tv at good old Walmart. A side benefit is that I can heat the house with it. Mine can become "smart" if I buy a Roku wireless streaming stick that plugs into the TV's USB port. It's a 65" and I bought it before having Internet connectivity became built-in on most TVs. Accessing the 'net via the PS4 is just as effective and it works fine. I just don't watch TV enough to warrant buying another TV just for built-in Internet connectivity. Most of the time I just use a little 23" HD TV that sits on my desk beside my computer monitor. Just hook an old PC to it. With a 2.4gz wireless mouse you end up with a TV that is a whole lot smarter than the ones sold as smart. We have both here. The PC connected wins every time in every category. The best combo seems to be my "travel" laptop connected to some no name TV. When the lap top turns off the TV goes to sleep and I have it set to hibernate when you close the lid. Open the lid, the pc comes to life and the TV comes on. You can get to any streaming service that way along with being able to play music or look at your pictures using whatever PC app you like. I don't collect or save old PCs. When they crap out or become so obsolete they can't run current apps efficiently I buy a new one. I "do" have an older Win 7 laptop that I no longer use regularly but I keep it as a backup or possible traveling computer. Somewhere I have an old XP laptop as well but it is painfully slow compared to Win 7 and Win 10. I wouldn't even bother with it. Besides, the little Roku thingy is much smaller and easier to mess with. What could be easier than a mouse and a real keyboard for entering things you want to search for? I hate trying to poke out text on a TV remote. With the Amazon thingy, you just talk to it. Haven't you been watching the Olympics at all? The cute little thing's name is 'Alexa'. Have you ever told her she is awesome? Mikek I don't have one. Tell me what happens. I know you can ask Suri to flip a coin. I thought that was cool. I told my daughter, and she thinks it's the most valuable thing in the world. Stops a lot of arguments with the kids. I wonder if Suri would 'pick a number between one and ten'. Would be interesting to do it a hundred times just to see the distribution of the answers. I recall it's a little different each time, but she's very polite and accepting. Mikek |
#75
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 2:20:28 PM UTC-5, amdx wrote:
On 2/27/2018 1:12 PM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:55:41 -0600, amdx wrote: On 2/26/2018 12:55 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:46:05 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:34:48 -0500, John H. wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:26:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2018 11:18 AM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:00:25 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2018 7:48 AM, justan wrote: "Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message: On 2/25/2018 10:33 PM, wrote: I am really serious about cutting the cord. My wife says after the olympics but that was today. I am already transitioning to streaming, I am working my way through the Amazon Prime documentaries They have just about anything that PBS ever aired. I talked about the American Experience show about the MLK assassination the other day. Today I am watching Frontline season 27 ep 8. This is contemporary with the 2009 crash and it is pretty interesting, carving through some of the myths we may have. I occasionally watch something from Amazon Prime's inventory. My large HD TV is not "smart" (connected to the Internet) so I use the Sony PS4 to stream stuff from Amazon. Their prime account entitles you to many movies and archived shows as you mention for free. I can also access Hulu, Netfix and other sources but I don't watch enough to bother with them. Smart tvs are cheap nowadays. I paid 800 for a 60 inch smart plasma tv at good old Walmart. A side benefit is that I can heat the house with it. Mine can become "smart" if I buy a Roku wireless streaming stick that plugs into the TV's USB port. It's a 65" and I bought it before having Internet connectivity became built-in on most TVs. Accessing the 'net via the PS4 is just as effective and it works fine. I just don't watch TV enough to warrant buying another TV just for built-in Internet connectivity. Most of the time I just use a little 23" HD TV that sits on my desk beside my computer monitor. Just hook an old PC to it. With a 2.4gz wireless mouse you end up with a TV that is a whole lot smarter than the ones sold as smart. We have both here. The PC connected wins every time in every category. The best combo seems to be my "travel" laptop connected to some no name TV. When the lap top turns off the TV goes to sleep and I have it set to hibernate when you close the lid. Open the lid, the pc comes to life and the TV comes on. You can get to any streaming service that way along with being able to play music or look at your pictures using whatever PC app you like. I don't collect or save old PCs. When they crap out or become so obsolete they can't run current apps efficiently I buy a new one. I "do" have an older Win 7 laptop that I no longer use regularly but I keep it as a backup or possible traveling computer. Somewhere I have an old XP laptop as well but it is painfully slow compared to Win 7 and Win 10. I wouldn't even bother with it. Besides, the little Roku thingy is much smaller and easier to mess with. What could be easier than a mouse and a real keyboard for entering things you want to search for? I hate trying to poke out text on a TV remote. With the Amazon thingy, you just talk to it. Haven't you been watching the Olympics at all? The cute little thing's name is 'Alexa'. Have you ever told her she is awesome? Mikek I don't have one. Tell me what happens. I know you can ask Suri to flip a coin. I thought that was cool. I told my daughter, and she thinks it's the most valuable thing in the world. Stops a lot of arguments with the kids. I wonder if Suri would 'pick a number between one and ten'. Would be interesting to do it a hundred times just to see the distribution of the answers. I recall it's a little different each time, but she's very polite and accepting. Mikek Ask her "Who let the dogs out?" Siri has retired that one. |
#76
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/27/2018 12:57 PM, amdx wrote: On 2/26/2018 11:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2018 12:38 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:35:02 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2018 12:26 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:52:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2018 11:34 AM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:26:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2018 11:18 AM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:00:25 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2018 7:48 AM, justan wrote: "Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message: On 2/25/2018 10:33 PM, wrote: I am really serious about cutting the cord. My wife says after the olympics but that was today. I am already transitioning to streaming, I am working my way through the Amazon Prime documentaries They have just about anything that PBS ever aired. I talked about the American Experience show about the MLK assassination the other day. Today I am watching Frontline season 27 ep 8. This is contemporary with the 2009 crash and it is pretty interesting, carving through some of the myths we may have. I occasionally watch something from Amazon Prime's inventory.Â* My large HD TV is not "smart" (connected to the Internet) so I use the Sony PS4 to stream stuff from Amazon.Â* Their prime account entitles you to many movies and archived shows as you mention for free. I can also access Hulu, Netfix and other sources but I don't watch enough to bother with them. Smart tvs are cheap nowadays. I paid 800 for a 60 inch smart Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* plasma tv at good old Walmart. A side benefit is that I can heat Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* the house with it. Mine can become "smart" if I buy a Roku wireless streaming stick that plugs into the TV's USB port.Â* It's a 65" and I bought it before having Internet connectivity became built-in on most TVs.Â* Accessing the 'net via the PS4 is just as effective and it works fine.Â* I just don't watch TV enough to warrant buying another TV just for built-in Internet connectivity.Â* Most of the time I just use a little 23" HD TV that sits on my desk beside my computer monitor. Just hook an old PC to it. With a 2.4gz wireless mouse you end up with a TV that is a whole lot smarter than the ones sold as smart. We have both here. The PC connected wins every time in every category. The best combo seems to be my "travel" laptop connected to some no name TV. When the lap top turns off the TV goes to sleep and I have it set to hibernate when you close the lid. Open the lid, the pc comes to life and the TV comes on. You can get to any streaming service that way along with being able to play music or look at your pictures using whatever PC app you like. I don't collect or save old PCs.Â* When they crap out or become so obsolete they can't run current apps efficiently I buy a new one.Â* I "do" have an older Win 7 laptop that I no longer use regularly but I keep it as a backup or possible traveling computer.Â* Somewhere I have an old XP laptop as well but it is painfully slow compared to Win 7 and Win 10.Â* I wouldn't even bother with it. Besides, the little Roku thingy is much smaller and easier to mess with. I still don't really understand how people who want to get rid of services like Comcast cable TV and Internet and go to streaming only are going to have access to the Internet. I think I posted the results of the tests I did that compared download speeds of AT&T's 4G WiFi service that I have in my truck and the download speeds of the Comcast (cable) WiFi router in my house. Comcast was consistently 3 to 4 times faster, sometimes even more.Â* The AT&T test (I did several for each)Â* often reported that although web browsing would be ok, videos may be slow, especially if more than one device was connected to the WiFi server.Â* The Comcast speed report consistently said that it's speed would allow web browsing and HD video downloads to several devices at the same time. For me, cutting the cord would be cutting the TV and telephone cords. The internet cord would stay whole. The TV cord is over $100/month, and that's without a bunch of movie channels. The telephone cord is another $40/month. How much is your Internet service? I don't have that problem.Â* I have just have what's called "expanded basic TV".Â* I can always order something "On Demand" but I can't remember the last time I did.Â*Â* Forget what it costs but it's cheap compared to the Internet service.Â* I don't have phone service via cable. Â* Just use my cell phone. It's a second account on her cell phone service and compared to her cell phone bill, mine contribution to it is peanuts. I pay $55 for internet. Ok.Â* I pay a little less ... $49/month.Â* The AT&T WiFi in the truck is $20/mo. for unlimited service but it's not anywhere near as fast.Â* I may cancel it.Â* Don't really know why I even got it. Â* I have buddy the recently switched from Comcast to WOW, because Comcast wouldn't negotiate their price. Wow gave him internet for $39.99.Â* He recommended Wow to a friend and the friend got the same 100Mbps service for $29.99. My buddy was a bit perplexed! Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Mikek The problem is that WOW isn't available in many places. In many areas Comcast is the only game in town. I had DSL before Comcast. Problem I had was urban area and in the evening might as well have no internet. Too many people, and he Mbps went to near zero. |
#77
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
amdx wrote:
On 2/26/2018 2:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2018 2:01 PM, Its Me wrote: On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 1:32:32 PM UTC-5, wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:26:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2018 11:18 AM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:00:25 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2018 7:48 AM, justan wrote: "Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message: On 2/25/2018 10:33 PM, wrote: I am really serious about cutting the cord. My wife says after the olympics but that was today. I am already transitioning to streaming, I am working my way through the Amazon Prime documentaries They have just about anything that PBS ever aired. I talked about the American Experience show about the MLK assassination the other day. Today I am watching Frontline season 27 ep 8. This is contemporary with the 2009 crash and it is pretty interesting, carving through some of the myths we may have. I occasionally watch something from Amazon Prime's inventory. My large HD TV is not "smart" (connected to the Internet) so I use the Sony PS4 to stream stuff from Amazon.Â* Their prime account entitles you to many movies and archived shows as you mention for free. I can also access Hulu, Netfix and other sources but I don't watch enough to bother with them. Smart tvs are cheap nowadays. I paid 800 for a 60 inch smart Â*Â*Â* plasma tv at good old Walmart. A side benefit is that I can heat Â*Â*Â* the house with it. Mine can become "smart" if I buy a Roku wireless streaming stick that plugs into the TV's USB port.Â* It's a 65" and I bought it before having Internet connectivity became built-in on most TVs.Â* Accessing the 'net via the PS4 is just as effective and it works fine.Â* I just don't watch TV enough to warrant buying another TV just for built-in Internet connectivity.Â* Most of the time I just use a little 23" HD TV that sits on my desk beside my computer monitor. Just hook an old PC to it. With a 2.4gz wireless mouse you end up with a TV that is a whole lot smarter than the ones sold as smart. We have both here. The PC connected wins every time in every category. The best combo seems to be my "travel" laptop connected to some no name TV. When the lap top turns off the TV goes to sleep and I have it set to hibernate when you close the lid. Open the lid, the pc comes to life and the TV comes on. You can get to any streaming service that way along with being able to play music or look at your pictures using whatever PC app you like. I don't collect or save old PCs.Â* When they crap out or become so obsolete they can't run current apps efficiently I buy a new one.Â* I "do" have an older Win 7 laptop that I no longer use regularly but I keep it as a backup or possible traveling computer.Â* Somewhere I have an old XP laptop as well but it is painfully slow compared to Win 7 and Win 10.Â* I wouldn't even bother with it. Those are plenty fast enough to stream TV and if you reloaded it back to what it was when you bought it, it would be as fast as it was then. Most "old and slow" PCs are just slow because they are loaded up with useless software, spyware and other barnacles you collect over the years. PCs make TVs smart and I have been doing it for close to 20 years. At first you needed a TV-out card but these days TVs have VGA ports and newer PCs have HDMI ports. They are naturals for each other. I would suggest your travel lap top for the TV. Then once you have that all set up, when you travel, you can hijack the TV wherever you go. The only time it is a problem is in a "Lodge Net TV" hotel. They have special TVs that I have not been able to hack into. You also find out the free WiFi is not fast enough to stream. When we rent houses, that is never a problem. Back in the days when I traveled and did system installs, I was staying in hotels and always had my traveling toolkit with me. Typically, the hotel TV's picture looked like crap and the adjustments were behind a screwed-down door to prevent the average joe from messing with them.Â* I took care of that issue on the first night. Me too.Â* Used to drive me nuts. Seems like they set them up in "Vivid" or store display mode. Now a days, you need to carry a pair of channel locks and your favorite shower head. Just don't forget it when you leave. Mikek You notice that in countries like Costa Rica. No low flow shower heads. |
#78
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:49:43 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 2/27/2018 1:17 PM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 11:36:00 -0600, amdx wrote: I have 30Mbps I often wonder how that translates to the real world. I had a lot of conversations with various tech support groups leading up to switching my web host and the problems that prompted that. The consensus was running a speed test to your ISPs test site was meaningless other than what the max is you can get. When you go to 3d party sites, that is a test of your servers and their servers but the real issue is what you can actually get when talking to a web site or other service. I know my news server is not even close to being able to keep my 10mb pipe full. I have also had times when Amazon was not able to keep a stream going without buffering, even tho I still had plenty of capacity on my end. (I could start a Netflix). It was just a new show on Prime and I am guessing they were slammed. That huge capacity may be good for multiple users hitting multiple byte hungry sites but I am not sure it is of a lot of value for 1 or 2 users. My wife's place was running the whole club on one Comcast line and they finally had to buy another one, not because of throughput but simply because one IP address could not support the number of unique sub net IPs they had on the LAN. Granted all of them were not streaming cat videos on Facebook but it was more than a few. Years ago when we wintered in Florida we had DSL because cable was not available. It worked ok but videos and HD media was not as popular and as heavily downloaded back then. When I opened the guitar shop in 2009 the building was not wired for cable so I had to get DSL again. That's when I really starting to notice the difference between the shop's DSL Internet speed and the speed of Comcast cable we had at the house. I used to update the shop's website daily and the program I used reloaded all of the website's content which would take forever on DSL. I ended up doing it at home after the shop closed. On cable the complete site would upload in less than 30 seconds. At the shop it sometimes took 5-10 minutes and often it would hang up and I'd have to start all over again. There is a difference, especially when more and more devices are added. Now with two or cell phones constantly connected, multiple computers, tablets, Smart TVs, etc., I can't see how DSL can be quick enough, but I don't have it anymore so I don't know. === DSL was always much slower on upload compared to download if I recall correctly. It was a feature. :-) --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com |
#79
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/27/2018 2:59 PM, Bill wrote:
amdx wrote: On 2/26/2018 2:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2018 2:01 PM, Its Me wrote: On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 1:32:32 PM UTC-5, wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:26:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2018 11:18 AM, wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:00:25 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2018 7:48 AM, justan wrote: "Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message: On 2/25/2018 10:33 PM, wrote: I am really serious about cutting the cord. My wife says after the olympics but that was today. I am already transitioning to streaming, I am working my way through the Amazon Prime documentaries They have just about anything that PBS ever aired. I talked about the American Experience show about the MLK assassination the other day. Today I am watching Frontline season 27 ep 8. This is contemporary with the 2009 crash and it is pretty interesting, carving through some of the myths we may have. I occasionally watch something from Amazon Prime's inventory. My large HD TV is not "smart" (connected to the Internet) so I use the Sony PS4 to stream stuff from Amazon.Â* Their prime account entitles you to many movies and archived shows as you mention for free. I can also access Hulu, Netfix and other sources but I don't watch enough to bother with them. Smart tvs are cheap nowadays. I paid 800 for a 60 inch smart Â*Â*Â* plasma tv at good old Walmart. A side benefit is that I can heat Â*Â*Â* the house with it. Mine can become "smart" if I buy a Roku wireless streaming stick that plugs into the TV's USB port.Â* It's a 65" and I bought it before having Internet connectivity became built-in on most TVs.Â* Accessing the 'net via the PS4 is just as effective and it works fine.Â* I just don't watch TV enough to warrant buying another TV just for built-in Internet connectivity.Â* Most of the time I just use a little 23" HD TV that sits on my desk beside my computer monitor. Just hook an old PC to it. With a 2.4gz wireless mouse you end up with a TV that is a whole lot smarter than the ones sold as smart. We have both here. The PC connected wins every time in every category. The best combo seems to be my "travel" laptop connected to some no name TV. When the lap top turns off the TV goes to sleep and I have it set to hibernate when you close the lid. Open the lid, the pc comes to life and the TV comes on. You can get to any streaming service that way along with being able to play music or look at your pictures using whatever PC app you like. I don't collect or save old PCs.Â* When they crap out or become so obsolete they can't run current apps efficiently I buy a new one.Â* I "do" have an older Win 7 laptop that I no longer use regularly but I keep it as a backup or possible traveling computer.Â* Somewhere I have an old XP laptop as well but it is painfully slow compared to Win 7 and Win 10.Â* I wouldn't even bother with it. Those are plenty fast enough to stream TV and if you reloaded it back to what it was when you bought it, it would be as fast as it was then. Most "old and slow" PCs are just slow because they are loaded up with useless software, spyware and other barnacles you collect over the years. PCs make TVs smart and I have been doing it for close to 20 years. At first you needed a TV-out card but these days TVs have VGA ports and newer PCs have HDMI ports. They are naturals for each other. I would suggest your travel lap top for the TV. Then once you have that all set up, when you travel, you can hijack the TV wherever you go. The only time it is a problem is in a "Lodge Net TV" hotel. They have special TVs that I have not been able to hack into. You also find out the free WiFi is not fast enough to stream. When we rent houses, that is never a problem. Back in the days when I traveled and did system installs, I was staying in hotels and always had my traveling toolkit with me. Typically, the hotel TV's picture looked like crap and the adjustments were behind a screwed-down door to prevent the average joe from messing with them.Â* I took care of that issue on the first night. Me too.Â* Used to drive me nuts. Seems like they set them up in "Vivid" or store display mode. Now a days, you need to carry a pair of channel locks and your favorite shower head. Just don't forget it when you leave. Mikek You notice that in countries like Costa Rica. No low flow shower heads. First thing I do when I replace a shower head is remove the flow restrictor. Helps a little. Restrictors are fine for the sinks but not for the shower, IMO. My current house has a separate shower and tub. I wish the shower had the water supply the tub has. It must be fed with 3/4 inch pipe. When I need to refill the humidifier I can fill a gallon jug of water from the tub faucet in 10 seconds flat using cold water only. It's even faster if I use both hot and cold. Takes 60 seconds or more from the kitchen sink faucet. |
#80
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/27/2018 3:34 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:49:43 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/27/2018 1:17 PM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 11:36:00 -0600, amdx wrote: I have 30Mbps I often wonder how that translates to the real world. I had a lot of conversations with various tech support groups leading up to switching my web host and the problems that prompted that. The consensus was running a speed test to your ISPs test site was meaningless other than what the max is you can get. When you go to 3d party sites, that is a test of your servers and their servers but the real issue is what you can actually get when talking to a web site or other service. I know my news server is not even close to being able to keep my 10mb pipe full. I have also had times when Amazon was not able to keep a stream going without buffering, even tho I still had plenty of capacity on my end. (I could start a Netflix). It was just a new show on Prime and I am guessing they were slammed. That huge capacity may be good for multiple users hitting multiple byte hungry sites but I am not sure it is of a lot of value for 1 or 2 users. My wife's place was running the whole club on one Comcast line and they finally had to buy another one, not because of throughput but simply because one IP address could not support the number of unique sub net IPs they had on the LAN. Granted all of them were not streaming cat videos on Facebook but it was more than a few. Years ago when we wintered in Florida we had DSL because cable was not available. It worked ok but videos and HD media was not as popular and as heavily downloaded back then. When I opened the guitar shop in 2009 the building was not wired for cable so I had to get DSL again. That's when I really starting to notice the difference between the shop's DSL Internet speed and the speed of Comcast cable we had at the house. I used to update the shop's website daily and the program I used reloaded all of the website's content which would take forever on DSL. I ended up doing it at home after the shop closed. On cable the complete site would upload in less than 30 seconds. At the shop it sometimes took 5-10 minutes and often it would hang up and I'd have to start all over again. There is a difference, especially when more and more devices are added. Now with two or cell phones constantly connected, multiple computers, tablets, Smart TVs, etc., I can't see how DSL can be quick enough, but I don't have it anymore so I don't know. === DSL was always much slower on upload compared to download if I recall correctly. It was a feature. :-) I think that's true of cable also. But here's something I found interesting when I did the speed tests to compare the AT&T WiFi in the truck and Comcast WiFi. AT&T's uploads were always a bit faster than the downloads. Maybe it's because the download speeds were very slow in comparison. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No wonder Amazon ... | General | |||
Amazon Prime/Amazon Music | General | |||
What Amazon doesn't want you to know. | UK Paddle | |||
What Amazon doesn't want you to know. | UK Paddle | |||
Amazon expedition partners wanted | Touring |