On 12/19/17 2:52 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/19/2017 2:48 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/19/17 1:16 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 06:54:37 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/18/17 11:40 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 21:58:58 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/18/17 9:02 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:36:15 -0500, Alex wrote:

wrote:
http://www.nbc-2.com/story/37085918/caller-confesses-to-murdering-her-wife-in-englewood


Strange that they are both transsexual and a couple.Â* If they liked
women, why would they decide to become women?

Nothing surprises me anymore. We have entered the twilight zone.
It was Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D., N.Y.) who warned of
"defining deviancy down" 2 decades ago and now that seems to be the
affirmative policy of the DNC. It used to be that a black woman
with a
latin surname was the perfect person for the job but now it also has
to be a transgendered, black, latino surname woman with a lesbian
wife
and dubious immigration status.



Feeling threatened, eh?

Not al all, just amazed at how far you can define deviancy down.
I see no threat to how I live my life either way. We were in the
flower business for 5 years. I have spent time around every type of
gender and sexually confused person you could imagine. I just shake my
head and move on.



Weren't you one of the transplanted southern boys who last week was
giving cover to the regional practice of males in their 30s marrying
girls as young as 14, or, in the case of Roy Moore, trying to rape
them?
Now that is deviance, harmful deviance.

"Rape"? That was never alleged. It is not clear that with the parents
permission even the 14 year old was illegal in Alabama at that time.


My recollection is that Moore had her blouse off and was proceeding,
until she somehow got him to stop. The rest of your response is nonsense.


Harry.Â* Moore lost.Â* Get over it.




D'oh. The subject was deviancy. Moore was cited as an example of a
deviant. I'm sure Moore will come up a few more times before the 2018
elections.

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:53:31 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

I'm sure Moore will come up a few more times before the 2018
elections.

Why, do you think he will pull this out by some miracle at the last
minute? Otherwise it is last years news.

On 12/19/17 8:48 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:53:31 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

I'm sure Moore will come up a few more times before the 2018
elections.

Why, do you think he will pull this out by some miracle at the last
minute? Otherwise it is last years news.


He'll be brought up as an example of the horrors GOPers stand ready to
inflict, as 2018's Todd Akin.

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:08:39 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 8:48 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:53:31 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

I'm sure Moore will come up a few more times before the 2018
elections.

Why, do you think he will pull this out by some miracle at the last
minute? Otherwise it is last years news.


He'll be brought up as an example of the horrors GOPers stand ready to
inflict, as 2018's Todd Akin.

There have been enough mainstream republicans who came out against
Moore to blunt that. Trump will flop back to his original opinion on
Moore if he hasn't already. The hard core evangelicals will still say
Moore was robbed.
The DNC really does not want to hit the "abuser" button too hard
considering how much trouble they are having.

On 12/19/17 10:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:08:39 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/19/17 8:48 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:53:31 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

I'm sure Moore will come up a few more times before the 2018
elections.

Why, do you think he will pull this out by some miracle at the last
minute? Otherwise it is last years news.


He'll be brought up as an example of the horrors GOPers stand ready to
inflict, as 2018's Todd Akin.

There have been enough mainstream republicans who came out against
Moore to blunt that. Trump will flop back to his original opinion on
Moore if he hasn't already. The hard core evangelicals will still say
Moore was robbed.
The DNC really does not want to hit the "abuser" button too hard
considering how much trouble they are having.



First they were for Moore, then they were against him, then they were
for him. There's plenty of videotape the Dems can use against child
molester Moore and his off-again, on-again supporters. Indeed, so far at
least, while the Dems have their own "troubles" in the abuse category,
the claims don't seem to involve underaged girls, as do the claims with
Moore and Trump. It'll be ugly, but if it ****s over the Republicans...