![]() |
|
U.S. Navy’s Damaged Destroyers Rendezvous in Japan
Interesting sight: http://gcaptain.com/us-navys-damaged-destroyers-rendezvous-in-japan/ --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com |
U.S. Navy’s Damaged Destroyers Rendezvous in Japan
On Friday, December 8, 2017 at 2:34:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
Interesting sight: http://gcaptain.com/us-navys-damaged-destroyers-rendezvous-in-japan/ Wow. I'm guessing the transport ships flood ballast tanks so they sink, the damaged ship float into the "dry dock" area, they build the structure to hold them underwater, they pump the ballast tanks to lift them? Whatever the exact procedure, that's quite an engineering exercise. Very cool. |
U.S. Navy’s Damaged Destroyers Rendezvous in Japan
On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:34:13 -0500, wrote:
Interesting sight: http://gcaptain.com/us-navys-damaged-destroyers-rendezvous-in-japan/ --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com Hopefully that'll be the first and last time for such a 'reunion'. Thanks for posting. I'd not seen it. |
U.S. Navy’s Damaged Destroyers Rendezvous in Japan
|
U.S. Navy’s Damaged Destroyers Rendezvous in Japan
On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:34:13 -0500,
wrote: Interesting sight: http://gcaptain.com/us-navys-damaged-destroyers-rendezvous-in-japan/ I'm just glad they didn't hit each other. |
U.S. Navy’s Damaged Destroyers Rendezvous in Japan
|
U.S. Navy’s Damaged Destroyers Rendezvous in Japan
On 12/9/17 8:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/9/2017 8:46 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/9/17 4:12 AM, wrote: On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:34:13 -0500, wrote: Interesting sight: http://gcaptain.com/us-navys-damaged-destroyers-rendezvous-in-japan/ I'm just glad they didn't hit each other. Lack of piloting, seamanship and small and large boat handling, the trademark of the U.S. Navy. Trolling again, Harry? Of course you are. How many collision accidents has the navy had so far this year, several resulting in multiple deaths? Six, eight? Bad training. |
U.S. Navy’s Damaged Destroyers Rendezvous in Japan
On 12/9/2017 9:24 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/9/17 8:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/9/2017 8:46 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/9/17 4:12 AM, wrote: On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:34:13 -0500, wrote: Interesting sight: http://gcaptain.com/us-navys-damaged-destroyers-rendezvous-in-japan/ I'm just glad they didn't hit each other. Lack of piloting, seamanship and small and large boat handling, the trademark of the U.S. Navy. Trolling again, Harry? Of course you are. How many collision accidents has the navy had so far this year, several resulting in multiple deaths? Six, eight? Bad training. Lack of training of piloting, seamanship and large boat handling ... yes ... in these incidents. "Trademark of the U.S. Navy? Hardly. How many U.S. Navy ships do you think are underway simultaneously? Far more than you probably realize. For example, last month seven of our 11 carrier battle groups were underway, each of which consists of many ships in addition to the carrier. There are also many smaller ships conducting independent patrols. Collisions are always a risk, especially when operating in close proximity to other ships but the collision that have occurred are hardly a "trademark" of the Navy. The collisions have underscored a lack of funding to re-instate the level of training provided in the past. It is being corrected. |
U.S. Navy’s Damaged Destroyers Rendezvous in Japan
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/9/17 4:12 AM, wrote: On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:34:13 -0500, wrote: Interesting sight: http://gcaptain.com/us-navys-damaged-destroyers-rendezvous-in-japan/ I'm just glad they didn't hit each other. Lack of piloting, seamanship and small and large boat handling, the trademark of the U.S. Navy. Seems as if the other ship suffered the same deficiencies. Both are supposed to avoid collisions. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:34 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com