Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
USA at War With Itself
On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 13:36:20 -0500,
wrote: On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 13:15:19 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/3/17 12:50 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 9:08:38 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: In fact, most corporate leaders queried have said they plan to use the cuts to further enrich themselves, buy back their stock, and payoff their shareholders. Bull****. The only "corporate leaders" who would say that are the liberals who want to discredit anything that Republicans do. They are the blood-sucking leeches on society. You're one lying sack-o-****, krause. Indeed, the Republicans are the blood-sucking leeches on society. The rich, in their opinion, don't control enough of the nation's wealth...they want it all. There have been several focus groups of corporate leaders and also surveys...and the overwhelming majority have no plans to build new factories, add lots of new hires, or raise wages. Here's one such article: "Major companies including Cisco Systems Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Coca-Cola Co. say they’ll turn over most gains from proposed corporate tax cuts to their shareholders, undercutting President Donald Trump’s promise that his plan will create jobs and boost wages for the middle class." https://is.gd/GcU25z There are many such articles. Here's one from Forbes, well-known liberal publication. Poor little JackOff...knows nothing, proud of it. === The purpose of a business, any business, is to generate profits for the owners. Even you should know that from your failed attempts at being successful. As a by product, increased profits can be spent on business expansion, research and development, plant modernization, or returned to shareholders (owners). All of that benefits the overall economy sooner or later. Increased wages are a function of supply and demand, nothing else. Harry is a Marxist. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" Profits, losses and market share are foreign concepts to him. If the government ran everything, distributing the proceeds equally to everyone regardless of actual contribution they make to the enterprise, he would be happy ... right up until they went the way of the Soviets and the South American communists. |
#23
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
USA at War With Itself
On 12/3/17 2:16 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 13:36:20 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 13:15:19 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/3/17 12:50 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 9:08:38 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: In fact, most corporate leaders queried have said they plan to use the cuts to further enrich themselves, buy back their stock, and payoff their shareholders. Bull****. The only "corporate leaders" who would say that are the liberals who want to discredit anything that Republicans do. They are the blood-sucking leeches on society. You're one lying sack-o-****, krause. Indeed, the Republicans are the blood-sucking leeches on society. The rich, in their opinion, don't control enough of the nation's wealth...they want it all. There have been several focus groups of corporate leaders and also surveys...and the overwhelming majority have no plans to build new factories, add lots of new hires, or raise wages. Here's one such article: "Major companies including Cisco Systems Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Coca-Cola Co. say they’ll turn over most gains from proposed corporate tax cuts to their shareholders, undercutting President Donald Trump’s promise that his plan will create jobs and boost wages for the middle class." https://is.gd/GcU25z There are many such articles. Here's one from Forbes, well-known liberal publication. Poor little JackOff...knows nothing, proud of it. === The purpose of a business, any business, is to generate profits for the owners. Even you should know that from your failed attempts at being successful. As a by product, increased profits can be spent on business expansion, research and development, plant modernization, or returned to shareholders (owners). All of that benefits the overall economy sooner or later. Increased wages are a function of supply and demand, nothing else. Harry is a Marxist. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" Profits, losses and market share are foreign concepts to him. If the government ran everything, distributing the proceeds equally to everyone regardless of actual contribution they make to the enterprise, he would be happy ... right up until they went the way of the Soviets and the South American communists. There you go again. My comment was that the tax cuts were only going to make the rich richer. It has nothing to do with marxism. |
#24
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
USA at War With Itself
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 14:30:21 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/3/17 2:16 PM, wrote: On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 13:36:20 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 13:15:19 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/3/17 12:50 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 9:08:38 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: In fact, most corporate leaders queried have said they plan to use the cuts to further enrich themselves, buy back their stock, and payoff their shareholders. Bull****. The only "corporate leaders" who would say that are the liberals who want to discredit anything that Republicans do. They are the blood-sucking leeches on society. You're one lying sack-o-****, krause. Indeed, the Republicans are the blood-sucking leeches on society. The rich, in their opinion, don't control enough of the nation's wealth...they want it all. There have been several focus groups of corporate leaders and also surveys...and the overwhelming majority have no plans to build new factories, add lots of new hires, or raise wages. Here's one such article: "Major companies including Cisco Systems Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Coca-Cola Co. say they’ll turn over most gains from proposed corporate tax cuts to their shareholders, undercutting President Donald Trump’s promise that his plan will create jobs and boost wages for the middle class." https://is.gd/GcU25z There are many such articles. Here's one from Forbes, well-known liberal publication. Poor little JackOff...knows nothing, proud of it. === The purpose of a business, any business, is to generate profits for the owners. Even you should know that from your failed attempts at being successful. As a by product, increased profits can be spent on business expansion, research and development, plant modernization, or returned to shareholders (owners). All of that benefits the overall economy sooner or later. Increased wages are a function of supply and demand, nothing else. Harry is a Marxist. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" Profits, losses and market share are foreign concepts to him. If the government ran everything, distributing the proceeds equally to everyone regardless of actual contribution they make to the enterprise, he would be happy ... right up until they went the way of the Soviets and the South American communists. There you go again. My comment was that the tax cuts were only going to make the rich richer. It has nothing to do with marxism. === The only way to boost the middle class is to boost the economy. So how do you propose to improve the overall economy without benefiting the uppper class also? They are the owners (shareholders) as I'm sure you know. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com |
#25
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
USA at War With Itself
On 12/3/2017 1:36 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 13:15:19 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/3/17 12:50 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 9:08:38 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: In fact, most corporate leaders queried have said they plan to use the cuts to further enrich themselves, buy back their stock, and payoff their shareholders. Bull****. The only "corporate leaders" who would say that are the liberals who want to discredit anything that Republicans do. They are the blood-sucking leeches on society. You're one lying sack-o-****, krause. Indeed, the Republicans are the blood-sucking leeches on society. The rich, in their opinion, don't control enough of the nation's wealth...they want it all. There have been several focus groups of corporate leaders and also surveys...and the overwhelming majority have no plans to build new factories, add lots of new hires, or raise wages. Here's one such article: "Major companies including Cisco Systems Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Coca-Cola Co. say they’ll turn over most gains from proposed corporate tax cuts to their shareholders, undercutting President Donald Trump’s promise that his plan will create jobs and boost wages for the middle class." https://is.gd/GcU25z There are many such articles. Here's one from Forbes, well-known liberal publication. Poor little JackOff...knows nothing, proud of it. === The purpose of a business, any business, is to generate profits for the owners. Even you should know that from your failed attempts at being successful. As a by product, increased profits can be spent on business expansion, research and development, plant modernization, or returned to shareholders (owners). All of that benefits the overall economy sooner or later. Increased wages are a function of supply and demand, nothing else. When you only look at the dark side of things you end up being a Harry. |
#26
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
USA at War With Itself
On 12/3/2017 1:59 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/3/17 1:36 PM, wrote: On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 13:15:19 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/3/17 12:50 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 9:08:38 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: In fact, most corporate leaders queried have said they plan to use the cuts to further enrich themselves, buy back their stock, and payoff their shareholders. Bull****.Â* The only "corporate leaders" who would say that are the liberals who want to discredit anything that Republicans do.Â* They are the blood-sucking leeches on society. You're one lying sack-o-****, krause. Indeed, the Republicans are the blood-sucking leeches on society. The rich, in their opinion, don't control enough of the nation's wealth...they want it all. There have been several focus groups of corporate leaders and also surveys...and the overwhelming majority have no plans to build new factories, add lots of new hires, or raise wages. Here's one such article: "Major companies including Cisco Systems Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Coca-Cola Co. say they’ll turn over most gains from proposed corporate tax cuts to their shareholders, undercutting President Donald Trump’s promise that his plan will create jobs and boost wages for the middle class." https://is.gd/GcU25z There are many such articles. Here's one from Forbes, well-known liberal publication. Poor little JackOff...knows nothing, proud of it. === The purpose of a business, any business, is to generate profits for the owners.Â* Even you should know that from your failed attempts at being successful.Â* As a by product, increased profits can be spent on business expansion, research and development, plant modernization, or returned to shareholders (owners).Â* All of that benefits the overall economy sooner or later. Increased wages are a function of supply and demand, nothing else. --- Your boy Trump and your political party promised lots of new factories, jobs, and increased wages as a result of the GOP Tax Scam. Virtually every sensible economist has called that promise bull****. Most of the tax savings will go to further enrich the rich. Heads on pikes...the only answer to runaway capitalism. Is a "sensible" economist a progressive liberal in your mind? |
#27
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
USA at War With Itself
On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 14:47:55 -0500, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 14:30:21 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/3/17 2:16 PM, wrote: On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 13:36:20 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 13:15:19 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/3/17 12:50 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 9:08:38 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: In fact, most corporate leaders queried have said they plan to use the cuts to further enrich themselves, buy back their stock, and payoff their shareholders. Bull****. The only "corporate leaders" who would say that are the liberals who want to discredit anything that Republicans do. They are the blood-sucking leeches on society. You're one lying sack-o-****, krause. Indeed, the Republicans are the blood-sucking leeches on society. The rich, in their opinion, don't control enough of the nation's wealth...they want it all. There have been several focus groups of corporate leaders and also surveys...and the overwhelming majority have no plans to build new factories, add lots of new hires, or raise wages. Here's one such article: "Major companies including Cisco Systems Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Coca-Cola Co. say they’ll turn over most gains from proposed corporate tax cuts to their shareholders, undercutting President Donald Trump’s promise that his plan will create jobs and boost wages for the middle class." https://is.gd/GcU25z There are many such articles. Here's one from Forbes, well-known liberal publication. Poor little JackOff...knows nothing, proud of it. === The purpose of a business, any business, is to generate profits for the owners. Even you should know that from your failed attempts at being successful. As a by product, increased profits can be spent on business expansion, research and development, plant modernization, or returned to shareholders (owners). All of that benefits the overall economy sooner or later. Increased wages are a function of supply and demand, nothing else. Harry is a Marxist. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" Profits, losses and market share are foreign concepts to him. If the government ran everything, distributing the proceeds equally to everyone regardless of actual contribution they make to the enterprise, he would be happy ... right up until they went the way of the Soviets and the South American communists. There you go again. My comment was that the tax cuts were only going to make the rich richer. It has nothing to do with marxism. === The only way to boost the middle class is to boost the economy. So how do you propose to improve the overall economy without benefiting the uppper class also? They are the owners (shareholders) as I'm sure you know. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com You guys just don't get it. If *anything* benefits the upper class in *any* way, then it is *wrong*. Now what's so hard to understand. (I'll be surprised if Harry answers your question.) |
#28
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
USA at War With Itself
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 14:30:21 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/3/17 2:16 PM, wrote: On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 13:36:20 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 13:15:19 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/3/17 12:50 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 9:08:38 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: In fact, most corporate leaders queried have said they plan to use the cuts to further enrich themselves, buy back their stock, and payoff their shareholders. Bull****. The only "corporate leaders" who would say that are the liberals who want to discredit anything that Republicans do. They are the blood-sucking leeches on society. You're one lying sack-o-****, krause. Indeed, the Republicans are the blood-sucking leeches on society. The rich, in their opinion, don't control enough of the nation's wealth...they want it all. There have been several focus groups of corporate leaders and also surveys...and the overwhelming majority have no plans to build new factories, add lots of new hires, or raise wages. Here's one such article: "Major companies including Cisco Systems Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Coca-Cola Co. say they’ll turn over most gains from proposed corporate tax cuts to their shareholders, undercutting President Donald Trump’s promise that his plan will create jobs and boost wages for the middle class." https://is.gd/GcU25z There are many such articles. Here's one from Forbes, well-known liberal publication. Poor little JackOff...knows nothing, proud of it. === The purpose of a business, any business, is to generate profits for the owners. Even you should know that from your failed attempts at being successful. As a by product, increased profits can be spent on business expansion, research and development, plant modernization, or returned to shareholders (owners). All of that benefits the overall economy sooner or later. Increased wages are a function of supply and demand, nothing else. Harry is a Marxist. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" Profits, losses and market share are foreign concepts to him. If the government ran everything, distributing the proceeds equally to everyone regardless of actual contribution they make to the enterprise, he would be happy ... right up until they went the way of the Soviets and the South American communists. There you go again. My comment was that the tax cuts were only going to make the rich richer. It has nothing to do with marxism. And Richard pointed out the things you talked about enrich the stockholders, most of whom are not really rich. They are pensioners and 401k holders. |
#29
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
USA at War With Itself
wrote:
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 14:30:21 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/3/17 2:16 PM, wrote: On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 13:36:20 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 13:15:19 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/3/17 12:50 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 9:08:38 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: In fact, most corporate leaders queried have said they plan to use the cuts to further enrich themselves, buy back their stock, and payoff their shareholders. Bull****. The only "corporate leaders" who would say that are the liberals who want to discredit anything that Republicans do. They are the blood-sucking leeches on society. You're one lying sack-o-****, krause. Indeed, the Republicans are the blood-sucking leeches on society. The rich, in their opinion, don't control enough of the nation's wealth...they want it all. There have been several focus groups of corporate leaders and also surveys...and the overwhelming majority have no plans to build new factories, add lots of new hires, or raise wages. Here's one such article: "Major companies including Cisco Systems Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Coca-Cola Co. say they’ll turn over most gains from proposed corporate tax cuts to their shareholders, undercutting President Donald Trump’s promise that his plan will create jobs and boost wages for the middle class." https://is.gd/GcU25z There are many such articles. Here's one from Forbes, well-known liberal publication. Poor little JackOff...knows nothing, proud of it. === The purpose of a business, any business, is to generate profits for the owners. Even you should know that from your failed attempts at being successful. As a by product, increased profits can be spent on business expansion, research and development, plant modernization, or returned to shareholders (owners). All of that benefits the overall economy sooner or later. Increased wages are a function of supply and demand, nothing else. Harry is a Marxist. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" Profits, losses and market share are foreign concepts to him. If the government ran everything, distributing the proceeds equally to everyone regardless of actual contribution they make to the enterprise, he would be happy ... right up until they went the way of the Soviets and the South American communists. There you go again. My comment was that the tax cuts were only going to make the rich richer. It has nothing to do with marxism. And Richard pointed out the things you talked about enrich the stockholders, most of whom are not really rich. They are pensioners and 401k holders. I depend on my dividends to live a nice life. |
#30
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
USA at War With Itself
wrote:
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 14:30:21 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/3/17 2:16 PM, wrote: On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 13:36:20 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 13:15:19 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/3/17 12:50 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 9:08:38 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: In fact, most corporate leaders queried have said they plan to use the cuts to further enrich themselves, buy back their stock, and payoff their shareholders. Bull****. The only "corporate leaders" who would say that are the liberals who want to discredit anything that Republicans do. They are the blood-sucking leeches on society. You're one lying sack-o-****, krause. Indeed, the Republicans are the blood-sucking leeches on society. The rich, in their opinion, don't control enough of the nation's wealth...they want it all. There have been several focus groups of corporate leaders and also surveys...and the overwhelming majority have no plans to build new factories, add lots of new hires, or raise wages. Here's one such article: "Major companies including Cisco Systems Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Coca-Cola Co. say they’ll turn over most gains from proposed corporate tax cuts to their shareholders, undercutting President Donald Trump’s promise that his plan will create jobs and boost wages for the middle class." https://is.gd/GcU25z There are many such articles. Here's one from Forbes, well-known liberal publication. Poor little JackOff...knows nothing, proud of it. === The purpose of a business, any business, is to generate profits for the owners. Even you should know that from your failed attempts at being successful. As a by product, increased profits can be spent on business expansion, research and development, plant modernization, or returned to shareholders (owners). All of that benefits the overall economy sooner or later. Increased wages are a function of supply and demand, nothing else. Harry is a Marxist. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" Profits, losses and market share are foreign concepts to him. If the government ran everything, distributing the proceeds equally to everyone regardless of actual contribution they make to the enterprise, he would be happy ... right up until they went the way of the Soviets and the South American communists. There you go again. My comment was that the tax cuts were only going to make the rich richer. It has nothing to do with marxism. And Richard pointed out the things you talked about enrich the stockholders, most of whom are not really rich. They are pensioners and 401k holders. About half of Americans own some stock through various means. Of those most of the stock is owned by the wealthy. Again, what is this marxist b.s. you are inagining? -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|