On 11/3/2017 8:08 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/3/2017 5:44 AM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 20:56:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politi...rty/index.html

You gotta love it Harry, it's from CNN too!....

(CNN)"Yes."
That was Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren's response to a simple
question asked by CNN's Jake
Tapper Thursday night: "Senator, do you agree with the notion that (the
2016 Democratic primary) was
rigged?"

"The funding arrangement with [Hillary For America] and the victory fund
agreement was not illegal,
but it sure looked unethical. If the fight had been fair, one campaign
would not have control of the
party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This
was not a criminal act, but
as I saw it, it compromised the party's integrity."

Harry Krause's heroine.



This is nothing more than another example of the unethical and dishonest
character of Hillary Clinton. This happened almost a year before she
officially announced her candidacy and demonstrates the arrogant sense
of entitlement she had with regard to becoming the next POTUS.

Many, including me, sorta looked at Debbie Wasserman Schultz as being
the one behind the DNC's preferential treatment of Hillary during the
Dem's nomination process but now it appears it was really Hillary and
her campaign pulling the strings. It also raises the question as to who
was really responsible for picking up the full tab for payments to the
lawyer firm who then paid Fusion GPS who then paid Steele, the UK former
spy who put together the Trump dossier. Under the terms of Hillary's
bailout of the DNC, she and her campaign controlled where DNC money was
spent.


Heh heh heh

https://flic.kr/p/212bqu7



heh heh heh

It wasn't me or the Republicans who brought up Hillary again in the
news. It was Donna Brazile, the former chairperson of the DNC who did.