Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,961
Default Back in the news ....


Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming
that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and
blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign.

Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians
were the source of the leaked emails.

Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just
doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt
her. It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along
with her many lies about them.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default Back in the news ....

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:


Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming
that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and
blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign.

Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians
were the source of the leaked emails.

Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just
doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt
her. It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along
with her many lies about them.


In today's news:

"During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the “maddening” double standards
women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more
women into politics,” she said."

I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist
also, not to mention racist, etc.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Back in the news ....

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:


Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming
that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and
blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign.

Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians
were the source of the leaked emails.

Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just
doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt
her. It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along
with her many lies about them.


In today's news:

"During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the “maddening” double standards
women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more
women into politics,” she said."

I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist
also, not to mention racist, etc.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview


The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against
sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started
thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it
with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these
allegations came up),
Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not
ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come
up now that women feel comfortable coming forward.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,961
Default Back in the news ....

On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:


Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming
that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and
blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign.

Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians
were the source of the leaked emails.

Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just
doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt
her. It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along
with her many lies about them.


In today's news:

"During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the “maddening” double standards
women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more
women into politics,” she said."

I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist
also, not to mention racist, etc.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview

The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against
sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started
thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it
with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these
allegations came up),
Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not
ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come
up now that women feel comfortable coming forward.



Trump "talked" about it with a buddy on a bus thinking the conversation
was private. He has never publicly admitted "doing it".

The Weinstein guy has admitted his transgressions but wants sympathy and
forgiveness because he's "sick".

Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of her
standard, 10 percent charitable contributions. So, that means she'll
return 10 percent of what he donated to charity. How 'bout the other 90
percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton Foundation?
Hasn't mentioned any of that. Despicable lawyer speak.




  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default Back in the news ....

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:06:21 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:


Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview claiming
that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and
blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential campaign.

Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians
were the source of the leaked emails.

Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just
doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that hurt
her. It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along
with her many lies about them.

In today's news:

"During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and the “maddening” double standards
women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out of politics is to get many more
women into politics,” she said."

I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who voted for Trump were sexist
also, not to mention racist, etc.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview

The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against
sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started
thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it
with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these
allegations came up),
Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not
ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come
up now that women feel comfortable coming forward.



Trump "talked" about it with a buddy on a bus thinking the conversation
was private. He has never publicly admitted "doing it".

The Weinstein guy has admitted his transgressions but wants sympathy and
forgiveness because he's "sick".

Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of her
standard, 10 percent charitable contributions. So, that means she'll
return 10 percent of what he donated to charity. How 'bout the other 90
percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton Foundation?
Hasn't mentioned any of that. Despicable lawyer speak.



Already spent.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...Weinstein.html



  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,424
Default Back in the news ....

On 10/16/17 2:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview
claiming
that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and
blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential
campaign.

Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians
were the source of the leaked emails.

Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary just
doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that
hurt
her.Â* It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along
with her many lies about them.

In today's news:

"During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and
the “maddening” double standards
women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out
of politics is to get many more
women into politics,” she said."

I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who
voted for Trump were sexist
also, not to mention racist, etc.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview


The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against
sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started
thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it
with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these
allegations came up),
Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not
ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come
up now that women feel comfortable coming forward.



Trump "talked" about it with a buddy on a bus thinking the conversation
was private.Â* He has never publicly admitted "doing it".

The Weinstein guy has admitted his transgressions but wants sympathy and
forgiveness because he's "sick".

Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of her
standard, 10 percent charitable contributions.Â* So, that means she'll
return 10 percent of what he donated to charity.Â* How 'bout the other 90
percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton Foundation?
Hasn't mentioned any of that.Â* Despicable lawyer speak.






I find it hilarious that you mook who directly or indirectly support
Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the
worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary
Clinton's tail.

The worst of all the supporters here, sadly, is Richard the Luddite,
who, despite his denials of being a Trump supporter, is almost always
the first in line to rationalize or justify Trump's behavior. That sort
of behavior from JustAnAsshole, Herring, Bilious, et cetera, would be
understandable because they're just mindless right-wingers, but I always
thought Richard was above that sort of lemming-like behavior.
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,961
Default Back in the news ....

On 10/16/2017 4:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/16/17 2:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview
claiming
that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and
blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential
campaign.

Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians
were the source of the leaked emails.

Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary
just
doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked that
hurt
her.Â* It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along
with her many lies about them.

In today's news:

"During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and
the “maddening” double standards
women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism out
of politics is to get many more
women into politics,” she said."

I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women who
voted for Trump were sexist
also, not to mention racist, etc.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview


The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against
sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started
thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it
with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these
allegations came up),
Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not
ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come
up now that women feel comfortable coming forward.



Trump "talked" about it with a buddy on a bus thinking the
conversation was private.Â* He has never publicly admitted "doing it".

The Weinstein guy has admitted his transgressions but wants sympathy
and forgiveness because he's "sick".

Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of
her standard, 10 percent charitable contributions.Â* So, that means
she'll return 10 percent of what he donated to charity.Â* How 'bout the
other 90 percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton
Foundation? Hasn't mentioned any of that.Â* Despicable lawyer speak.






I find it hilarious that you mook who directly or indirectly support
Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the
worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary
Clinton's tail.

The worst of all the supporters here, sadly, is Richard the Luddite,
who, despite his denials of being a Trump supporter, is almost always
the first in line to rationalize or justify Trump's behavior. That sort
of behavior from JustAnAsshole, Herring, Bilious, et cetera, would be
understandable because they're just mindless right-wingers, but I always
thought Richard was above that sort of lemming-like behavior.



That's rich. You are calling *me* a lemming?

BTW ... the reason I keep pouring salt on Hillary's wounds is because
she keeps popping up with blame claims. If she just STFU and went away
I wouldn't have any interest in her. She sorta reminds me of that
"Wack-A-Mole" arcade game where the moles keep popping up out of their
holes and the player is supposed to wack them back down.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7nPhk-fYFg




  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default Back in the news ....

Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
I find it hilarious that you mook(s) who directly or indirectly support
Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the
worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary
Clinton's tail.
....

I you say he's the worst human being. You say he's the worst president ever.

You said Hillary was a shoe in. You Said Donald was electable.

Your a real "jimmy the Greek" Harry. Remember?

"Go, DONALD GO!"
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,424
Default Back in the news ....

On 10/16/17 4:30 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/16/2017 4:14 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/16/17 2:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/16/2017 12:35 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:54:11 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Ol' Hillary is back again, this time in an Australian interview
claiming
that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was a tool for the Russians and
blames him for publishing hacked emails that hurt her presidential
campaign.

Assange (for what it's worth) has repeatedly denied that the Russians
were the source of the leaked emails.

Regardless of how they were hacked or who was responsible, Hillary
just
doesn't "get it" that it wasn't the fact that they were hacked
that hurt
her.Â* It was the content contained in the emails that hurt her, along
with her many lies about them.

In today's news:

"During her talk, she blamed her loss to Donald Trump on sexism and
the “maddening” double standards
women are held to in public life. “The only way we’ll get sexism
out of politics is to get many more
women into politics,” she said."

I don't think I'd heard that one before. I suppose all the women
who voted for Trump were sexist
also, not to mention racist, etc.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...hour-interview


The election of Trump probably did more to advance the fight against
sexual abuse than anything else in history. Suddenly the left started
thinking this was a bad thing after years of other democrats doing it
with impunity from them. (Trump was even a democrat when most of these
allegations came up),
Now that we have decided pussy grabbing is a crime, they could not
ignore Weinstein and Afflack transgressions. I suspect more will come
up now that women feel comfortable coming forward.



Trump "talked" about it with a buddy on a bus thinking the
conversation was private.Â* He has never publicly admitted "doing it".

The Weinstein guy has admitted his transgressions but wants sympathy
and forgiveness because he's "sick".

Hillary says she'll return some of his contributions in the form of
her standard, 10 percent charitable contributions.Â* So, that means
she'll return 10 percent of what he donated to charity.Â* How 'bout
the other 90 percent and how about his contributions to the Clinton
Foundation? Hasn't mentioned any of that.Â* Despicable lawyer speak.






I find it hilarious that you mook who directly or indirectly support
Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the
worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary
Clinton's tail.

The worst of all the supporters here, sadly, is Richard the Luddite,
who, despite his denials of being a Trump supporter, is almost always
the first in line to rationalize or justify Trump's behavior. That
sort of behavior from JustAnAsshole, Herring, Bilious, et cetera,
would be understandable because they're just mindless right-wingers,
but I always thought Richard was above that sort of lemming-like
behavior.



That's rich.Â* You are calling *me* a lemming?

BTW ... the reason I keep pouring salt on Hillary's wounds is because
she keeps popping up with blame claims.Â* If she just STFU and went away
I wouldn't have any interest in her.Â* She sorta reminds me of that
"Wack-A-Mole" arcade game where the moles keep popping up out of their
holes and the player is supposed to wack them back down.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7nPhk-fYFg





You seem a hell of a lot more interested in Hillary than I am, Mr.
Luddite-Lemming.
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default Back in the news ....

On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 4:04:15 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
I find it hilarious that you mook(s) who directly or indirectly support
Trump, who will go down as the worst president in U.S. history and the
worst human being, too, are still trying to put salt on Hillary
Clinton's tail.
...

I you say he's the worst human being. You say he's the worst president ever.

You said Hillary was a shoe-in. You Said Donald wasn't electable.

Your a real "Jimmy the Greek," Harry. Remember?

"Go, DONALD GO!"


BTW she salted herself a plenty.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pond Scum Scott back in the news... Keyser Söze General 10 April 19th 16 01:09 AM
rowboats news bot tracks breaking rowboat news [email protected] General 0 December 7th 05 07:29 PM
it should seemingly behave in back of Felix when the sweet frames shout in back of the strong monolith Winifred ASA 0 April 22nd 05 11:54 AM
for Gilbert the carpenter's sharp, in back of me it's strange, whereas in back of you it's calling heavy Sarah A. Abercrombie ASA 0 April 8th 05 01:51 PM
OT--Great news for Iraq...terrible news for Iran NOYB General 0 June 4th 04 03:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017