https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/28/supreme-court-hear-challenge-public-union-fees/711745001/

Wrote in message:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/28/supreme-court-hear-challenge-public-union-fees/711745001/


As Mr Pork Butt would say, "DELICIOUS".
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/28/supreme-court-hear-challenge-public-union-fees/711745001/

As Mr Pork Butt would say, "DELICIOUS".

+1

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 21:41:07 -0400, Alex wrote:

justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/28/supreme-court-hear-challenge-public-union-fees/711745001/

As Mr Pork Butt would say, "DELICIOUS".

+1


I'm surprised Harry isn't applauding that decision. After all, progressive liberals are all for
personal freedoms, no?

On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 08:28:21 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 21:41:07 -0400, Alex wrote:

justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/28/supreme-court-hear-challenge-public-union-fees/711745001/

As Mr Pork Butt would say, "DELICIOUS".

+1


I'm surprised Harry isn't applauding that decision. After all, progressive liberals are all for
personal freedoms, no?

Harry likes the idea of confiscating wages against the worker's will
as long as the money goes to the union. In the case of government
unions they also take tax money against our will to empower the union
to take even more money from us in rigged "negotiations" where the
union gets to sit on both sides of the table. That is the main reason
why the big cities are going bankrupt. Their unions have managed to
negotiate contracts that the tax payers can't afford to fulfill.