|
The unions may get a little haircut
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/28/supreme-court-hear-challenge-public-union-fees/711745001/
|
The unions may get a little haircut
|
The unions may get a little haircut
|
The unions may get a little haircut
On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 21:41:07 -0400, Alex wrote:
justan wrote: Wrote in message: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/28/supreme-court-hear-challenge-public-union-fees/711745001/ As Mr Pork Butt would say, "DELICIOUS". +1 I'm surprised Harry isn't applauding that decision. After all, progressive liberals are all for personal freedoms, no? |
The unions may get a little haircut
On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 08:28:21 -0400, John H
wrote: On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 21:41:07 -0400, Alex wrote: justan wrote: Wrote in message: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/28/supreme-court-hear-challenge-public-union-fees/711745001/ As Mr Pork Butt would say, "DELICIOUS". +1 I'm surprised Harry isn't applauding that decision. After all, progressive liberals are all for personal freedoms, no? Harry likes the idea of confiscating wages against the worker's will as long as the money goes to the union. In the case of government unions they also take tax money against our will to empower the union to take even more money from us in rigged "negotiations" where the union gets to sit on both sides of the table. That is the main reason why the big cities are going bankrupt. Their unions have managed to negotiate contracts that the tax payers can't afford to fulfill. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com