Look at yourself, Harry.
 

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 8/15/2017 6:40 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 8/14/17 11:03 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:08:20 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 8/14/17 7:32 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 19:25:51 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 8/14/2017 6:57 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 8/14/17 5:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:30:27 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 8/14/17 2:11 PM, wrote:
.

Is this bull**** or just ignorance that you seem so proud of?
You are saying you have no interest in what your leaders are
doing in
congress? Why should we pay any attention to your political
posts at
all?
I suggest you stop wasting your time at Kos and Salon and take
a peek
at Congress.gov. This is what is really going on, not just a
roll up
of opinion and biased reporting.
It may not have been as important since the 90s to watch what
your
congress is doing and stop watching the shiny object the press is
holding up in your face. The distraction of the blue, jizz
stained
dress, hid the deregulation of Wall Street. I wonder what all
of this
Russia business will be hiding.

Most of what congress does on serious matters takes place in the
cloakrooms and other private meeting rooms, including the
offices of
legislators. Congree.GOV reports on the official actions, but
not the
background. You'll get the "what" on that site, but not the
"why" on
contentious legislation. I used to write the legislative
testimony of
three labor unions and was on the hill frequently to watch and
report on
legislative activities.

And no, I do not keep abreast of the legislative activities of
Pelosi or
Waters, aside from what I may read in the news.

I understand the deals are made in secret but they are just
dreams and
aspirations until they get dropped into legislation. This is
usually
an amendment to a benign sounding bill. That is why you should be
paying more attention to what congress is doing. I do not trust the
news to report most of this. They are too lazy to actually read the
legislation and most congressmen who vote on it are not much
better.
They spend most of their time raising bribes ... er ...
contributions.



I get legislative alerts from groups I trust. They follow the
legislation that interests me, and a lot more closely and with
better,
first class interpretation than CONGRESS.GOV provides.


Biased interpretation . . .



He "trusts" the Daily Kos



===

And The Onion

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


Ahh, the alt-righties...W'hine and Floodite.

===

Richard and I are probably the two most politically moderate guys that
you're likely to meet in this group. What would you call the rest?



Considering oneself a "moderate" and supporting or wanting to give
Donald Trump "a chance" after seven months of his horror show would seem
to preclude any claim of moderation. Several of the remaining
"Republicans" in this newsgroup would have felt right at home carrying a
tiki torch and marching with the right-wing extremist trash in
Charlottesville this past weekend.

The reality is, in this day and age, I'm not sure there is an entity
that one might describe as a "moderate" Republican. There are a few
elected Republican officials in the U.S. House and Senate who are less
right-wing than most of their Republican colleagues, but I wouldn't
describe them as "moderate." They're just a tad less "way out there"
than their colleagues.



In other words, if one does not subscribe to your progressive liberal
ideology, one is a "Trumpster".

Not only is this shallow, it's completely dishonest. I get a kick out
of how easily you are led by nose.




I was asked for an opinion. I gave it. I gave it without personally
insulting anyone. Too bad you can’t do the same. Sad.

--
Posted with my iPhone 7+.

Look at yourself, Harry.
 

Keyser Söze
- show quoted text -
I was asked for an opinion. I gave it. I gave it without personally
insulting anyone. Too bad you can’t do the same. Sad.

--
Where do you conjure up these things Harry. I've never known Richard or Wayne to insult anyone. You, on the other hand insult others frequently.

Harry you're way of thinking is rather dark. You like to spin something up and then blame the trouble on someone else- and actually think it's convincing. Well, maybe to you it is...

Look at yourself, Harry.
 

Aug 13Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Uh, was that the title of the sermon you heard in church? There is no
ultra left that begins to compare in size or in hatred with the ultra
right. In fact, I'm not convinced there really is much of an ultra left.
I haven't noticed the ultra left descending upon a sleepy southern city,
armed and visibly carrying semi-auto rifles, preaching racial and
religious hatred, starting fist fights, running over innocent women and
into a crowd, and having slime KKK'ers like David Duke praising the
activities and claiming they are just fulfilling Donald Trump's promises.

Of course, Fretwell will say it is all the same same same same. It makes
him feel better to try to equalize immorality.
.....

Harry to you there is no left. Only centrist, right, ultra-right, extremist-right, and at the top is "rightie"

Amazing...

Look at yourself, Harry.
 

On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 9:10:17 AM UTC-4, Tim wrote:
Keyser Söze
- show quoted text -
I was asked for an opinion. I gave it. I gave it without personally
insulting anyone. Too bad you can’t do the same. Sad.

--
Where do you conjure up these things Harry. I've never known Richard or Wayne to insult anyone. You, on the other hand insult others frequently.

Harry you're way of thinking is rather dark. You like to spin something up and then blame the trouble on someone else- and actually think it's convincing. Well, maybe to you it is...

So he thinks "Several of the remaining
"Republicans" in this newsgroup would have felt right at home carrying a
tiki torch and marching with the right-wing extremist trash in
Charlottesville this past weekend" isn't insulting to posters here who may lean to the right? I seriously doubt that *anyone* here would want anything to do with an alt-right protest. Harry is an asshole, plain and simple.

Look at yourself, Harry.
 

On 8/15/17 9:10 AM, Tim wrote:
Keyser Söze
- show quoted text -
I was asked for an opinion. I gave it. I gave it without personally
insulting anyone. Too bad you can’t do the same. Sad.


Where do you conjure up these things Harry. I've never known Richard
or Wayne to insult anyone. You, on the other hand insult others frequently.

You've never known them to insult anyone? You haven't been reading their
snarly post. Hey, I don't give a **** what they post, but for you to
deny what they are doing means you have your head buried in the sand.

Look at yourself, Harry.
 

On 8/15/17 9:14 AM, Tim wrote:

Aug 13Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Uh, was that the title of the sermon you heard in church? There is no
ultra left that begins to compare in size or in hatred with the ultra
right. In fact, I'm not convinced there really is much of an ultra left.
I haven't noticed the ultra left descending upon a sleepy southern city,
armed and visibly carrying semi-auto rifles, preaching racial and
religious hatred, starting fist fights, running over innocent women and
into a crowd, and having slime KKK'ers like David Duke praising the
activities and claiming they are just fulfilling Donald Trump's promises.

Of course, Fretwell will say it is all the same same same same. It makes
him feel better to try to equalize immorality.
....

Harry to you there is no left. Only centrist, right, ultra-right, extremist-right, and at the top is "rightie"

Amazing...



Another brain-dead assumption on your part. As an example, I have posted
here many times that I am a progressive leftie, and I have posted about
others who I have described as lefties. But thanks for your usually
incisive post.

Look at yourself, Harry.
 

On 8/15/17 9:19 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 8/15/2017 6:40 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 8/14/17 11:03 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:08:20 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 8/14/17 7:32 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 19:25:51 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 8/14/2017 6:57 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 8/14/17 5:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:30:27 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 8/14/17 2:11 PM, wrote:
.

Is this bull**** or just ignorance that you seem so proud of?
You are saying you have no interest in what your leaders are
doing in
congress? Why should we pay any attention to your political
posts at
all?
I suggest you stop wasting your time at Kos and Salon and take
a peek
at Congress.gov. This is what is really going on, not just a
roll up
of opinion and biased reporting.
It may not have been as important since the 90s to watch what
your
congress is doing and stop watching the shiny object the press is
holding up in your face. The distraction of the blue, jizz
stained
dress, hid the deregulation of Wall Street. I wonder what all
of this
Russia business will be hiding.

Most of what congress does on serious matters takes place in the
cloakrooms and other private meeting rooms, including the
offices of
legislators. Congree.GOV reports on the official actions, but
not the
background. You'll get the "what" on that site, but not the
"why" on
contentious legislation. I used to write the legislative
testimony of
three labor unions and was on the hill frequently to watch and
report on
legislative activities.

And no, I do not keep abreast of the legislative activities of
Pelosi or
Waters, aside from what I may read in the news.

I understand the deals are made in secret but they are just
dreams and
aspirations until they get dropped into legislation. This is
usually
an amendment to a benign sounding bill. That is why you should be
paying more attention to what congress is doing. I do not trust the
news to report most of this. They are too lazy to actually read the
legislation and most congressmen who vote on it are not much
better.
They spend most of their time raising bribes ... er ...
contributions.



I get legislative alerts from groups I trust. They follow the
legislation that interests me, and a lot more closely and with
better,
first class interpretation than CONGRESS.GOV provides.


Biased interpretation . . .



He "trusts" the Daily Kos



===

And The Onion

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


Ahh, the alt-righties...W'hine and Floodite.

===

Richard and I are probably the two most politically moderate guys that
you're likely to meet in this group. What would you call the rest?



Considering oneself a "moderate" and supporting or wanting to give
Donald Trump "a chance" after seven months of his horror show would seem
to preclude any claim of moderation. Several of the remaining
"Republicans" in this newsgroup would have felt right at home carrying a
tiki torch and marching with the right-wing extremist trash in
Charlottesville this past weekend.

The reality is, in this day and age, I'm not sure there is an entity
that one might describe as a "moderate" Republican. There are a few
elected Republican officials in the U.S. House and Senate who are less
right-wing than most of their Republican colleagues, but I wouldn't
describe them as "moderate." They're just a tad less "way out there"
than their colleagues.



In other words, if one does not subscribe to your progressive liberal
ideology, one is a "Trumpster".

Not only is this shallow, it's completely dishonest. I get a kick out
of how easily you are led by nose.




I was asked for an opinion. I gave it. I gave it without personally
insulting anyone. Too bad you can?t do the same. Sad.

--
Posted with my iPhone 7+.


You crack me up. One post without insulting anyone and you expect
anyone to follow your lead. Dream on asshole.


Wrong, Flatulent Jim...my "expectations" for this right-wing newsgroup
amount to...none.

Look at yourself, Harry.
 

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:40:33 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

The reality is, in this day and age, I'm not sure there is an entity
that one might describe as a "moderate" Republican. There are a few
elected Republican officials in the U.S. House and Senate who are less
right-wing than most of their Republican colleagues, but I wouldn't
describe them as "moderate." They're just a tad less "way out there"
than their colleagues.

===

Don't really consider myself to be a republican, or a democrat for
that matter. I agree with the republicans on some issues, disagree on
others, same with democrats to a certain extent, and the same with
Trump. Certainly Trump has major issues with personality, character
and style but that's not sufficient reason to oppose everything he
supports.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

Look at yourself, Harry.
 

On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 11:33:28 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:40:33 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

The reality is, in this day and age, I'm not sure there is an entity
that one might describe as a "moderate" Republican. There are a few
elected Republican officials in the U.S. House and Senate who are less
right-wing than most of their Republican colleagues, but I wouldn't
describe them as "moderate." They're just a tad less "way out there"
than their colleagues.

===

Don't really consider myself to be a republican, or a democrat for
that matter. I agree with the republicans on some issues, disagree on
others, same with democrats to a certain extent, and the same with
Trump. Certainly Trump has major issues with personality, character
and style but that's not sufficient reason to oppose everything he
supports.

I'm right there with you. It would be nice if we could take some things from the Republican platform and some from the Democrats and blend it together into single, cohesive message. With politics in DC being so contentious on both sides, it doesn't look like that's going to happen any time soon. The art of compromise seems to be lost. And the media is right in the middle of it stirring things up to ensure nothing gets done.

Look at yourself, Harry.
 

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:40:33 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Considering oneself a "moderate" and supporting or wanting to give
Donald Trump "a chance" after seven months of his horror show would seem
to preclude any claim of moderation.

Not giving the legally elected president "a chance" is what happened
in 3d world countries. You were advocating the overthrow of the
government since last November because the election did not come out
the way you wanted and I don't remember you criticizing the violent
protests that came after his election.
The "horror show" is the reaction of the radical leftists.

Several of the remaining
"Republicans" in this newsgroup would have felt right at home carrying a
tiki torch and marching with the right-wing extremist trash in
Charlottesville this past weekend.

Ant you would be right at home burning businesses and shooting at cops
with the BLM/WTO rioters