LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Destroyer/Container ship collision

On 6/18/2017 8:20 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/18/17 7:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/18/2017 1:37 AM, Bill wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jun 2017 17:01:29 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Saw the pictures of the USS Fitzgerald and the merchant container ship
that were involved in a collision.

The bow of the merchant ship obviously hit the destroyer on it's
starboard side. Maritime rules say (if memory serves) a powered
vessel
crossing from right to left is the "stand on" vessel and the other is
the "give way" vessel and is required to turn to starboard and pass
astern of the other, stop or take other evasive action to avoid a
collision.


National Maritime College Rule:

"When two power-driven vessels are in crossing situation on a
collision
course, give way to the vessel to starboard (right).The give way
vessel
must take early and obvious action to avoid a collision by either
stopping or altering course to starboard."

Based on the damage to the merchant ship's bow and the damage to the
destroyer's starboard side, it appears the destroyer tried to cut
across
the bow of the merchant ship. There may have been other factors
obviously, like other vessels in the area.





Any time you have damage on your starboard side the question of
burdened vessel might come up. Was the freighter overtaking?

This certainly looks like a 90 degree shot tho, not a glancing blow.




Looked like an angle shot as the container ship bow is not caved in, but
the front near the anchor is tore up.


Sadly, they found the missing sailors dead in their flooded berthing
compartment.




This is really sad...the assumption is the guys were asleep in their
bunks when the collision happened? The inquiry should be interesting. I
would have thought a modern warship would be able to sustain a heavy hit
like it took without being so seriously damaged.


It's amazing that the destroyer wasn't cut in half. The merchant
container ship displaces 29,000 tons empty (without cargo) and was
heavily loaded making it's displacement closer to 45,000 - 50,000 tons.
The USS Fitzgerald only displaces a little over 8,000 tons. The
merchant container ship was reportedly traveling at 12-15 knots as well.

That's a lot of inertial force. Energy equals mass x velocity squared
according to some famous genius.

It was only due to the damage control training of the Navy sailors that
kept the destroyer afloat. They fought the threat of sinking for over
16 hours.

My daughter has a girlfriend who's son is serving on the USS Fitzgerald.
We are all saddened by the loss of life but are hopeful he wasn't
involved or hurt.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Million gallon barge catches fire after collision in Houston Ship Channel Wayne.B General 6 July 21st 15 03:05 AM
New Type 45 Destroyer Eddie General 0 October 9th 10 05:14 PM
Mersey traffic - container ship msc togo 9-6-08 entering seaforth_cml size.jpg (1/1) [email protected] Tall Ship Photos 0 August 9th 08 10:30 AM
Mersey traffic - container ship msc togo 9-6-08 entering seaforth.jpg (1/1) [email protected] Tall Ship Photos 0 August 9th 08 10:30 AM
(CA) [5/5] - unidentified APL container ship Vancouver BC 2006_0325.jpg (1/1) Stephen Rees Tall Ship Photos 0 March 26th 07 06:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017