![]() |
Pathfinder update
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/4/2017 8:30 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/4/17 7:07 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 6/4/2017 1:03 AM, wrote: On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:16:43 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 6/3/2017 5:17 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/3/17 4:02 PM, wrote: On Sat, 3 Jun 2017 13:32:45 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Greg had the 1912 Evinrude, signed by Ole Evinrude himself and with 210,000 hours on it. :) Funny you say that. I did have a 1924 Evinrude I got for $25 from the same little old lady who sold me the 1974 7.5 HP merc I used on my 12' jon boat for years. (both for $300). I still have the 7.5 but I gave the old 'rude to a collector here. I am sure I could have sold it for a handsome profit but this was a good guy who appreciated it. I am sure it is restored to like new condition by now. It is what he does. My dad always had some really old Evinrudes in the shop, but I don't recall what most of them were. I do remember, though, a 50 hp monster from post WWII that he stuck on a 13' speedboat he built to race around Long Island Sound. Found a photo of one: http://tinyurl.com/y9exrwyc Don't think that's a 50 hp outboard. The spec says "3hp at 3000 RPM. That is not the same one. That looks newer I think Harry must have posted and referenced the wrong image. The one he referenced was definitely *not* a fifty horsepower outboard. It had a built-in gas tank for cripes sake. Maybe when he typed his post he missed putting a decimal point after the "5" and meant to say "5.0 horsepower". None the less, the spec on the image he posted said "3hp at 3000 RPM. Following WWII outboards fell in the 1.5 hp to 25 hp range. In 1958 OMC introduced a four cylinder, 50 hp outboard that used a combination of Johnson designed and Evinrude designed components. The head was aluminum (from Johnson) and the steel parts were from Evinrude. When I was a kid I had a fascination with outboards and the horsepower race between Mercury, Johnson and Evinrude. In those days Johnson and Evinrude were not the same designs even though they were both owned by OMC. They marketed different engines in different horsepower ratings. Evinrude was considered the "higher end" motor and Johnson was the more bare bones alternative. Mercury usually won the horsepower rating race every year as the new lineups were announced. Their "Tower of Power" design won most of the races and comparisons. I suggest you look more closely at the fuzzy specs on the photo I posted. It is a 50 hp BIG FOUR cylinder Evinrude and "built-in" gas tanks were common. Note the handles on the engine on both sides and compare with the vids of the similar engine that are available. Here's a vid of an even earlier Evinrude Big Four 50-hp outboard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXkRHtUZoQI Merc had some engines on which it seriously underrated the output and they sold well for lake use, but they had corrosion problems in those days in salt water use. My apologies. I *did* look closely at the fuzzy specs ... in fact I copied and downloaded the image using Infraview. I could swear the second line says, "3 hp at 3000 RPM. I agree it looks that way to me, too, but the first line seems to say 50 hp. And the rest of the specs indicate an engine much larger than 3 hp, and so fo the vids. -- Posted with my iPhone 7+. |
Pathfinder update
On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:30:55 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:
Merc had some engines on which it seriously underrated the output and they sold well for lake use, but they had corrosion problems in those days in salt water use. When I was at that Teamster confab at the Lake of the Ozarks (1960 or so) there was a guy who raced on the Mississippi and he swore the Merc 85hp twins he had were more powerful than the brand new 100 HP motors. They were tricked up a bit tho, His aluminum cat boat would do well over 60 and that was flying in those days. Now days any garden variety flats or bass boat will run 60. (But they are running 200-250 HP outboards) |
Pathfinder update
|
Pathfinder update
On 6/4/2017 10:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/4/17 10:35 AM, wrote: On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:30:55 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Merc had some engines on which it seriously underrated the output and they sold well for lake use, but they had corrosion problems in those days in salt water use. When I was at that Teamster confab at the Lake of the Ozarks (1960 or so) there was a guy who raced on the Mississippi and he swore the Merc 85hp twins he had were more powerful than the brand new 100 HP motors. They were tricked up a bit tho, His aluminum cat boat would do well over 60 and that was flying in those days. Now days any garden variety flats or bass boat will run 60. (But they are running 200-250 HP outboards) Merc was especially famous for outboards labeled 10 hp for lakes that had a 10 hp restriction. They were more like 20 or 25 hp. :) I always got a kick out of the "9.9 hp" ratings. Around here the restrictions were on 10 hp and up. |
Pathfinder update
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/4/2017 10:48 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 6/4/17 10:35 AM, wrote: On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:30:55 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Merc had some engines on which it seriously underrated the output and they sold well for lake use, but they had corrosion problems in those days in salt water use. When I was at that Teamster confab at the Lake of the Ozarks (1960 or so) there was a guy who raced on the Mississippi and he swore the Merc 85hp twins he had were more powerful than the brand new 100 HP motors. They were tricked up a bit tho, His aluminum cat boat would do well over 60 and that was flying in those days. Now days any garden variety flats or bass boat will run 60. (But they are running 200-250 HP outboards) Merc was especially famous for outboards labeled 10 hp for lakes that had a 10 hp restriction. They were more like 20 or 25 hp. :) I always got a kick out of the "9.9 hp" ratings. Around here the restrictions were on 10 hp and up. We had a Magnolia cutty cabin twin O/B in about 1959. Twin 35 mercs and it would run 35-40 mph. They wee ripped off, so,dat replaced with 45's. Seemed like the same performance. Interesting boat. Only problem other than motors stolen, was the same boat that Magnolia ran down the Mississippi. Through the Panama Canal up to Fort Bragg, Calif. was 22-23'. They hit the whistle buoy going in to Richmond Harbor and knocked a hole in the bow. Borrowed our trailer to get it to the repair dealer. Interesting talking to them. 50 gallon barrels of extra fuel. They said was hard to,get fuel on the Pacific Coast after leaving the canal for a few hundred miles. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com