On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 1:05:58 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
Poco Deplorevole
"On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 09:48:06 -0400, wrote:

- show quoted text -
"The U.S. lumber industry has argued for decades that because most Canadian timber is harvested on
Crown lands, the way provincial governments manage and set prices for these harvests results in
cheaper lumber.

"Today's ruling confirms that Canadian lumber mills are subsidized by their government and benefit
from timber pricing policies and other subsidies which harm U.S. manufacturers and workers,"

I wonder if Don White disputes that."


Who's ruling?
Everytime we have gone to International arbitration, we win but murica doesn't feel it has to abide by GATT rulings
BTW..In Nova Scotia most lumber is harvested from private rather than Crown lands. Thus we were granted an exception from your bullying till now. Trump has just slapped a 24 percent tariff against us. Maybe the civilized world should do the same to murican products.

It was 3 to 24 percent. American product are already tarriffed. Why shouldn't 'nad products be as well?

Its Me
- show quoted text -
"It was 3 to 24 percent. Â*American product are already tarriffed. Â*Why shouldn't 'nad products be as well?"

D'uh, JackOff.
The whole idea of NAFTA is removing barriers and the FREE trade of goods between the member countries.
Our media is claiming 24 percent against Nova Scotians forestry products although our lumber comes from private lots...not Crown land.

On 6/1/17 4:05 PM, True North wrote:
Its Me
- show quoted text -
"It was 3 to 24 percent. American product are already tarriffed. Why shouldn't 'nad products be as well?"

D'uh, JackOff.
The whole idea of NAFTA is removing barriers and the FREE trade of goods between the member countries.
Our media is claiming 24 percent against Nova Scotians forestry products although our lumber comes from private lots...not Crown land.


In this country, we give the logging rights to private companies so they
can profit greatly from public lands.

Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
"In this country, we give the logging rights to private companies so they
can profit greatly from public lands."


Confusing....we keep hearing that the supposedly low stumpage fees the lumber companies pay to cut on Crown land is the big reason why American companies convince the US gov't to apply tariffs. It's supposedly considered an unfair advantage.
Shouldn't apply to my province though.

On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 4:09:12 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/1/17 4:05 PM, True North wrote:
Its Me
- show quoted text -
"It was 3 to 24 percent. American product are already tarriffed. Why shouldn't 'nad products be as well?"

D'uh, JackOff.
The whole idea of NAFTA is removing barriers and the FREE trade of goods between the member countries.
Our media is claiming 24 percent against Nova Scotians forestry products although our lumber comes from private lots...not Crown land.


In this country, we give the logging rights to private companies so they
can profit greatly from public lands.

They pay for those rights.

"...commercial logging on national forests through the Forest Service’s timber sale program, in which private timber companies pay the Forest Service to be allowed to cut down trees on public land."

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/1/17 4:05 PM, True North wrote:
Its Me
- show quoted text -
"It was 3 to 24 percent. American product are already tarriffed. Why
shouldn't 'nad products be as well?"

D'uh, JackOff.
The whole idea of NAFTA is removing barriers and the FREE trade of goods
between the member countries.
Our media is claiming 24 percent against Nova Scotians forestry products
although our lumber comes from private lots...not Crown land.


In this country, we give the logging rights to private companies so they
can profit greatly from public lands.


They pay for those logging rights. So they are sold, not given.

On 6/1/17 5:04 PM, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
Its Me
- show quoted text -
"It was 3 to 24 percent. American product are already tarriffed. Why shouldn't 'nad products be as well?"

D'uh, JackOff.
The whole idea of NAFTA is removing barriers and the FREE trade of goods between the member countries.
Our media is claiming 24 percent against Nova Scotians forestry products although our lumber comes from private lots...not Crown land.


I'd be a little more sympathetic if your border gestapo was a bit
more friendly toward Americans.


Just because they have your photo up there as a "Designated Asshole"
doesn't mean all U.S. citizens are treated the way you are. I've crossed
the U.S.-Canada border legally many times, and never have had the
slightest delay or problem.

On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 5:06:31 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/1/17 5:04 PM, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
Its Me
- show quoted text -
"It was 3 to 24 percent. American product are already tarriffed. Why shouldn't 'nad products be as well?"

D'uh, JackOff.
The whole idea of NAFTA is removing barriers and the FREE trade of goods between the member countries.
Our media is claiming 24 percent against Nova Scotians forestry products although our lumber comes from private lots...not Crown land.


I'd be a little more sympathetic if your border gestapo was a bit
more friendly toward Americans.


Just because they have your photo up there as a "Designated Asshole"
doesn't mean all U.S. citizens are treated the way you are. I've crossed
the U.S.-Canada border legally many times, and never have had the
slightest delay or problem.

Your experience is not the same as everyone's.

On 6/1/17 5:10 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 5:06:31 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/1/17 5:04 PM, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
Its Me
- show quoted text -
"It was 3 to 24 percent. American product are already tarriffed. Why shouldn't 'nad products be as well?"

D'uh, JackOff.
The whole idea of NAFTA is removing barriers and the FREE trade of goods between the member countries.
Our media is claiming 24 percent against Nova Scotians forestry products although our lumber comes from private lots...not Crown land.


I'd be a little more sympathetic if your border gestapo was a bit
more friendly toward Americans.


Just because they have your photo up there as a "Designated Asshole"
doesn't mean all U.S. citizens are treated the way you are. I've crossed
the U.S.-Canada border legally many times, and never have had the
slightest delay or problem.

Your experience is not the same as everyone's.


Neither is FlaJackoffJim's. I've driven across and flown across, the
later in commercial and private planes. Cleared customs once in
Cleveland, of all places.

On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 5:18:41 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/1/17 5:10 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 5:06:31 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 6/1/17 5:04 PM, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
Its Me
- show quoted text -
"It was 3 to 24 percent. American product are already tarriffed. Why shouldn't 'nad products be as well?"

D'uh, JackOff.
The whole idea of NAFTA is removing barriers and the FREE trade of goods between the member countries.
Our media is claiming 24 percent against Nova Scotians forestry products although our lumber comes from private lots...not Crown land.


I'd be a little more sympathetic if your border gestapo was a bit
more friendly toward Americans.


Just because they have your photo up there as a "Designated Asshole"
doesn't mean all U.S. citizens are treated the way you are. I've crossed
the U.S.-Canada border legally many times, and never have had the
slightest delay or problem.

Your experience is not the same as everyone's.


Neither is FlaJackoffJim's. I've driven across and flown across, the
later in commercial and private planes. Cleared customs once in
Cleveland, of all places.

I never stated what my experience was, haree. But there's no doubt the border has a deserved reputation for detaining and harassing people from time to time.

As usual, you're "special".