On 5/30/2017 6:28 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2017 19:57:34 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/29/17 7:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/29/2017 5:25 PM, Tim wrote:

Had to look hard to find an unfavorable comment about Trump's Memorial
Day speech today.

But CNN came through in a pinch. Even with a decent headline and
story, they had to get in a
negative line when they could:
.....

That's understandable. They've had a vendetta since he called them
"fake news" so they scrape what they can hoping to churn up something.

Want a champagne popsicle?



Like the headline of an article appearing yesterday in the NYTimes:

"A Constitutional Puzzle: Can the President Be Indicted?"

The headline suggests that Trump has already been found guilty of
something and now we are on to the Constitutional debate of his indictment.

Trump has *not* been found guilty of anything. In fact, nobody has
released any evidence that he has done anything even remotely illegal.

I agree with you Tim. The liberal press has had a vendetta against
Trump ever since he announced his candidacy.



"Indicted" does not mean found guilty or guilty.

'Provided' does not mean 'performed'.

As Luddite said, the headline suggests guilt, your comment notwithstanding.



It's the dishonest attempt to create a mindset in people, a form of
brainwashing. The NYT's and WashPost have been doing this since Trump
won the election. Disgusting and immoral.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

On Mon, 29 May 2017 19:04:11 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



I agree with you Tim. The liberal press has had a vendetta against
Trump ever since he announced his candidacy.



That is not really true. They didn't start trashing him until after
the convention. The media could have sunk his candidacy in the spring
by just ignoring him. Instead they gave him a 100 million dollars
worth of free air time

On 5/29/2017 8:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2017 19:04:11 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



I agree with you Tim. The liberal press has had a vendetta against
Trump ever since he announced his candidacy.



That is not really true. They didn't start trashing him until after
the convention. The media could have sunk his candidacy in the spring
by just ignoring him. Instead they gave him a 100 million dollars
worth of free air time


That's true too. I guess like Harry, they were rooting for him all the way.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

On Monday, May 29, 2017 at 9:43:46 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/29/2017 8:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 29 May 2017 19:04:11 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



I agree with you Tim. The liberal press has had a vendetta against
Trump ever since he announced his candidacy.



That is not really true. They didn't start trashing him until after
the convention. The media could have sunk his candidacy in the spring
by just ignoring him. Instead they gave him a 100 million dollars
worth of free air time


That's true too. I guess like Harry, they were rooting for him all the way.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

"GO DONALD GO!"

On 5/29/17 7:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/29/2017 5:25 PM, Tim wrote:

Had to look hard to find an unfavorable comment about Trump's Memorial
Day speech today.

But CNN came through in a pinch. Even with a decent headline and
story, they had to get in a
negative line when they could:
.....

That's understandable. They've had a vendetta since he called them
"fake news" so they scrape what they can hoping to churn up something.

Want a champagne popsicle?



Like the headline of an article appearing yesterday in the NYTimes:

"A Constitutional Puzzle: Can the President Be Indicted?"

The headline suggests that Trump has already been found guilty of
something and now we are on to the Constitutional debate of his indictment.

Trump has *not* been found guilty of anything. In fact, nobody has
released any evidence that he has done anything even remotely illegal.

I agree with you Tim. The liberal press has had a vendetta against
Trump ever since he announced his candidacy.



By the way, it is too bad and very telling that you and your fellow
right-wingers didn't bother to read the article you singled out.

"A Constitutional Puzzle: Can the President Be Indicted?"

The article had almost nothing to do with Trump and almost everything to
do with the Constitutional issues involved in prosecuting a sitting
POTUS for criminal infractions.

As for Trump as it was for Nixon...we need to know if the president is a
crook.

On 5/30/2017 7:29 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/29/17 7:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/29/2017 5:25 PM, Tim wrote:

Had to look hard to find an unfavorable comment about Trump's
Memorial Day speech today.

But CNN came through in a pinch. Even with a decent headline and
story, they had to get in a
negative line when they could:
.....

That's understandable. They've had a vendetta since he called them
"fake news" so they scrape what they can hoping to churn up something.

Want a champagne popsicle?



Like the headline of an article appearing yesterday in the NYTimes:

"A Constitutional Puzzle: Can the President Be Indicted?"

The headline suggests that Trump has already been found guilty of
something and now we are on to the Constitutional debate of his
indictment.

Trump has *not* been found guilty of anything. In fact, nobody has
released any evidence that he has done anything even remotely illegal.

I agree with you Tim. The liberal press has had a vendetta against
Trump ever since he announced his candidacy.



By the way, it is too bad and very telling that you and your fellow
right-wingers didn't bother to read the article you singled out.

"A Constitutional Puzzle: Can the President Be Indicted?"

The article had almost nothing to do with Trump and almost everything to
do with the Constitutional issues involved in prosecuting a sitting
POTUS for criminal infractions.

As for Trump as it was for Nixon...we need to know if the president is a
crook.



I know. I read the article. As I pointed out in another post it was the
*headline* of the article, and it's very obvious timing.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/30/2017 7:29 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/29/17 7:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/29/2017 5:25 PM, Tim wrote:

Had to look hard to find an unfavorable comment about Trump's
Memorial Day speech today.

But CNN came through in a pinch. Even with a decent headline and
story, they had to get in a
negative line when they could:
.....

That's understandable. They've had a vendetta since he called them
"fake news" so they scrape what they can hoping to churn up something.

Want a champagne popsicle?



Like the headline of an article appearing yesterday in the NYTimes:

"A Constitutional Puzzle: Can the President Be Indicted?"

The headline suggests that Trump has already been found guilty of
something and now we are on to the Constitutional debate of his
indictment.

Trump has *not* been found guilty of anything. In fact, nobody has
released any evidence that he has done anything even remotely illegal.

I agree with you Tim. The liberal press has had a vendetta against
Trump ever since he announced his candidacy.



By the way, it is too bad and very telling that you and your fellow
right-wingers didn't bother to read the article you singled out.

"A Constitutional Puzzle: Can the President Be Indicted?"

The article had almost nothing to do with Trump and almost everything to
do with the Constitutional issues involved in prosecuting a sitting
POTUS for criminal infractions.

As for Trump as it was for Nixon...we need to know if the president is a
crook.



I know. I read the article. As I pointed out in another post it was the
*headline* of the article, and it's very obvious timing.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com



The headline was fine. You are looking too hard for reportage rhat supports
your biases.

--
Posted with my iPhone 7+.

On Tue, 30 May 2017 07:29:21 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

The article had almost nothing to do with Trump and almost everything to
do with the Constitutional issues involved in prosecuting a sitting
POTUS for criminal infractions.
That seems to be settled law.
Clinton took a plea deal for 2 felonies but was never indicted.
Nixon was never indicted either but he acknowledged the same charges.
as Bill with his resignation.