On 5/2/17 4:41 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 14:13:30 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 2:06 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:38:30 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 7:15 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
...and think you have *real* problems, just remember: Somewhere in this world there is a *Mrs.*
Krause!

.

Just think, JohnnyMop, if you were married to someone in the mental
health field, she'd probably already have you committed for your
seething hatred of blacks, Latinos, gays, and others who offend your
fake christianity.

Weak.


It doesn't matter what you think about it.

Then why waste your time writing it, weak though it is?


You're not in charge here, nor are you the official arbiter.

On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 4:56:19 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/2/17 4:41 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 14:13:30 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 2:06 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:38:30 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 7:15 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
...and think you have *real* problems, just remember: Somewhere in this world there is a *Mrs.*
Krause!

.

Just think, JohnnyMop, if you were married to someone in the mental
health field, she'd probably already have you committed for your
seething hatred of blacks, Latinos, gays, and others who offend your
fake christianity.

Weak.


It doesn't matter what you think about it.

Then why waste your time writing it, weak though it is?


You're not in charge here, nor are you the official arbiter.

Neither are you. Your **** is weak. Deal with it.

Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 4:56:19 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/2/17 4:41 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 14:13:30 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 2:06 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:38:30 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 7:15 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
...and think you have *real* problems, just remember: Somewhere in
this world there is a *Mrs.*
Krause!

.

Just think, JohnnyMop, if you were married to someone in the mental
health field, she'd probably already have you committed for your
seething hatred of blacks, Latinos, gays, and others who offend your
fake christianity.

Weak.


It doesn't matter what you think about it.

Then why waste your time writing it, weak though it is?


You're not in charge here, nor are you the official arbiter.

Neither are you. Your **** is weak. Deal with it.


But his blood pressure is acceptable. At least according to his self.

On Tue, 2 May 2017 16:56:16 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 4:41 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 14:13:30 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 2:06 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:38:30 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 7:15 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
...and think you have *real* problems, just remember: Somewhere in this world there is a *Mrs.*
Krause!

.

Just think, JohnnyMop, if you were married to someone in the mental
health field, she'd probably already have you committed for your
seething hatred of blacks, Latinos, gays, and others who offend your
fake christianity.

Weak.


It doesn't matter what you think about it.

Then why waste your time writing it, weak though it is?


You're not in charge here, nor are you the official arbiter.

Krause, with all your knowledge you should be able to recognize the difference between a question
and an order. One ends with '?' and the other ends with '.'.

There, now you can answer the question.

On 5/3/17 9:34 AM, justan wrote:
Poco Deplorevole Wrote in message:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 16:56:16 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 4:41 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 14:13:30 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 2:06 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:38:30 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 7:15 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
...and think you have *real* problems, just remember: Somewhere in this world there is a *Mrs.*
Krause!

.

Just think, JohnnyMop, if you were married to someone in the mental
health field, she'd probably already have you committed for your
seething hatred of blacks, Latinos, gays, and others who offend your
fake christianity.

Weak.


It doesn't matter what you think about it.

Then why waste your time writing it, weak though it is?


You're not in charge here, nor are you the official arbiter.

Krause, with all your knowledge you should be able to recognize the difference between a question
and an order. One ends with '?' and the other ends with '.'.

There, now you can answer the question.


And maybe he can learn to see the offering of religious
information as a friendly gesture as opposed to his radical
thinking that they are jamming it down his throat.


There is nothing wrong with offering religious information to those who
seek it. If people want to believe that sort of nonsense, that's their
business. If, however, you are forcing your religious beliefs onto the
public, then you should be arrested.

On 5/3/2017 10:43 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/3/17 9:34 AM, justan wrote:
Poco Deplorevole Wrote in message:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 16:56:16 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 4:41 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 14:13:30 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 2:06 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:38:30 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 5/2/17 7:15 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
...and think you have *real* problems, just remember: Somewhere
in this world there is a *Mrs.*
Krause!

.

Just think, JohnnyMop, if you were married to someone in the mental
health field, she'd probably already have you committed for your
seething hatred of blacks, Latinos, gays, and others who offend
your
fake christianity.

Weak.


It doesn't matter what you think about it.

Then why waste your time writing it, weak though it is?


You're not in charge here, nor are you the official arbiter.

Krause, with all your knowledge you should be able to recognize the
difference between a question
and an order. One ends with '?' and the other ends with '.'.

There, now you can answer the question.


And maybe he can learn to see the offering of religious
information as a friendly gesture as opposed to his radical
thinking that they are jamming it down his throat.


There is nothing wrong with offering religious information to those who
seek it. If people want to believe that sort of nonsense, that's their
business. If, however, you are forcing your religious beliefs onto the
public, then you should be arrested.



I suppose that concept could be applied to commercials and
advertisements for products and services on TV, radio and in print.
I don't seek them. I don't ask for them. I think most of them are
nonsense. But they are still forced upon me. I just ignore the vast
majority of them and listen only if I feel like it.

On 5/3/17 10:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/3/2017 10:43 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/3/17 9:34 AM, justan wrote:
Poco Deplorevole Wrote in message:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 16:56:16 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 4:41 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 14:13:30 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 5/2/17 2:06 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:38:30 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 5/2/17 7:15 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
...and think you have *real* problems, just remember: Somewhere
in this world there is a *Mrs.*
Krause!

.

Just think, JohnnyMop, if you were married to someone in the
mental
health field, she'd probably already have you committed for your
seething hatred of blacks, Latinos, gays, and others who offend
your
fake christianity.

Weak.


It doesn't matter what you think about it.

Then why waste your time writing it, weak though it is?


You're not in charge here, nor are you the official arbiter.

Krause, with all your knowledge you should be able to recognize the
difference between a question
and an order. One ends with '?' and the other ends with '.'.

There, now you can answer the question.


And maybe he can learn to see the offering of religious
information as a friendly gesture as opposed to his radical
thinking that they are jamming it down his throat.


There is nothing wrong with offering religious information to those who
seek it. If people want to believe that sort of nonsense, that's their
business. If, however, you are forcing your religious beliefs onto the
public, then you should be arrested.



I suppose that concept could be applied to commercials and
advertisements for products and services on TV, radio and in print.
I don't seek them. I don't ask for them. I think most of them are
nonsense. But they are still forced upon me. I just ignore the vast
majority of them and listen only if I feel like it.



Perhaps you should check out the concept and details of "forcing"
religious beliefs onto the public. If you are selling cars through
advertising, it is easy enough to ignore the advertising, or turn the
page, or change the channel. If you have a shop and you want to stay
open on a Sunday and there are religiously passed and enforced blue laws
extant (and there are and were, though not many these days), those
religious beliefs are being forced on you. Oh, I deliberately chose a
mild example.

On Wed, 3 May 2017 11:05:26 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/3/17 10:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


Perhaps you should check out the concept and details of "forcing"
religious beliefs onto the public. If you are selling cars through
advertising, it is easy enough to ignore the advertising, or turn the
page, or change the channel. If you have a shop and you want to stay
open on a Sunday and there are religiously passed and enforced blue laws
extant (and there are and were, though not many these days), those
religious beliefs are being forced on you. Oh, I deliberately chose a
mild example.

There was more than just blue laws in effect that closed shops on
sunday and it was more than just liquor stores. In a more gentle time,
people actually thought we should rest on the weekends and in the
evenings. That was brought to us by the unions. I remember when it was
shocking that the (new to us) 7-11 actually stayed open until 11. It
was the only light on at that time.
I understand that in NYC and LA they had late night stores but not so
much in DC.
It was in the GoGo 70s and 80s that things became 24/7.

On 5/4/17 11:48 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 3 May 2017 11:05:26 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/3/17 10:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


Perhaps you should check out the concept and details of "forcing"
religious beliefs onto the public. If you are selling cars through
advertising, it is easy enough to ignore the advertising, or turn the
page, or change the channel. If you have a shop and you want to stay
open on a Sunday and there are religiously passed and enforced blue laws
extant (and there are and were, though not many these days), those
religious beliefs are being forced on you. Oh, I deliberately chose a
mild example.

There was more than just blue laws in effect that closed shops on
sunday and it was more than just liquor stores. In a more gentle time,
people actually thought we should rest on the weekends and in the
evenings. That was brought to us by the unions. I remember when it was
shocking that the (new to us) 7-11 actually stayed open until 11. It
was the only light on at that time.
I understand that in NYC and LA they had late night stores but not so
much in DC.
It was in the GoGo 70s and 80s that things became 24/7.



Connecticut, the state in which I grew up, had a long and horrific
history with religiously based "blue laws," most of which were either
long gone, forgotten or otherwise made inconsequential by my time. But
there were some vestiges, one of which controlled which businesses could
stay open and which had to be closed on Sundays. Hopefully, these
religious laws are totally gone in Connecticut by now. These laws had
everything to do with religious pressures.

On 5/3/17 11:35 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 5/3/17 10:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/3/2017 10:43 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/3/17 9:34 AM, justan wrote:
Poco Deplorevole Wrote in message:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 16:56:16 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 5/2/17 4:41 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 14:13:30 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 5/2/17 2:06 PM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:38:30 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 5/2/17 7:15 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
...and think you have *real* problems, just remember: Somewhere
in this world there is a *Mrs.*
Krause!

.

Just think, JohnnyMop, if you were married to someone in the
mental
health field, she'd probably already have you committed for your
seething hatred of blacks, Latinos, gays, and others who offend
your
fake christianity.

Weak.


It doesn't matter what you think about it.

Then why waste your time writing it, weak though it is?


You're not in charge here, nor are you the official arbiter.

Krause, with all your knowledge you should be able to recognize the
difference between a question
and an order. One ends with '?' and the other ends with '.'.

There, now you can answer the question.


And maybe he can learn to see the offering of religious
information as a friendly gesture as opposed to his radical
thinking that they are jamming it down his throat.


There is nothing wrong with offering religious information to those who
seek it. If people want to believe that sort of nonsense, that's their
business. If, however, you are forcing your religious beliefs onto the
public, then you should be arrested.



I suppose that concept could be applied to commercials and
advertisements for products and services on TV, radio and in print.
I don't seek them. I don't ask for them. I think most of them are
nonsense. But they are still forced upon me. I just ignore the vast
majority of them and listen only if I feel like it.



Perhaps you should check out the concept and details of "forcing"
religious beliefs onto the public. If you are selling cars through
advertising, it is easy enough to ignore the advertising, or turn the
page, or change the channel. If you have a shop and you want to stay
open on a Sunday and there are religiously passed and enforced blue laws
extant (and there are and were, though not many these days), those
religious beliefs are being forced on you. Oh, I deliberately chose a
mild example.


Blue laws are archaic laws, not religious beliefs. Learn to know
the difference, if you are smart enough.


You are as ignorant of history as your boy, Trump. Blue laws came about
as a result of religious beliefs.