So, you didn't type this? I'd rather not be able to read than be
dumber than a post.. in this case, yours.

"I provided you a direct quote from the Wash Post today in another
post."

The Examiner quote referenced the "second to last paragraph".
Not me.

As I said, you're a liar.

On 4/25/2017 5:27 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
So, you didn't type this? I'd rather not be able to read than be
dumber than a post.. in this case, yours.

"I provided you a direct quote from the Wash Post today in another
post."

The Examiner quote referenced the "second to last paragraph".
Not me.

As I said, you're a liar.



Give up man. I "did" provide you a direct quote from the Wash Post.

Here ... I'll repeat it again for the *third* time. Try to read slowly
and thoughtfully if you can. Maybe you'll get it this time:

From the Washington Post (for the benefit of Nomen Nescio):

"While just 4 percent of Trump's supporters say they would back someone
else if there was a redo of the election, fully 15 percent of Clinton
supporters say they would ditch her. Trump leads in a re-do of the 2016
election 43 percent to 40 percent after losing the popular vote 46-44."

.... Aaron Blake April 23 - Washington Post

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:08:57 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/25/2017 5:27 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
So, you didn't type this? I'd rather not be able to read than be
dumber than a post.. in this case, yours.

"I provided you a direct quote from the Wash Post today in another
post."

The Examiner quote referenced the "second to last paragraph".
Not me.

As I said, you're a liar.



Give up man. I "did" provide you a direct quote from the Wash Post.

Here ... I'll repeat it again for the *third* time. Try to read slowly
and thoughtfully if you can. Maybe you'll get it this time:

From the Washington Post (for the benefit of Nomen Nescio):

"While just 4 percent of Trump's supporters say they would back someone
else if there was a redo of the election, fully 15 percent of Clinton
supporters say they would ditch her. Trump leads in a re-do of the 2016
election 43 percent to 40 percent after losing the popular vote 46-44."

... Aaron Blake April 23 - Washington Post


Why are you wasting your time with this anonymous asshole?

On 4/25/2017 10:11 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:08:57 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/25/2017 5:27 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
So, you didn't type this? I'd rather not be able to read than be
dumber than a post.. in this case, yours.

"I provided you a direct quote from the Wash Post today in another
post."

The Examiner quote referenced the "second to last paragraph".
Not me.

As I said, you're a liar.



Give up man. I "did" provide you a direct quote from the Wash Post.

Here ... I'll repeat it again for the *third* time. Try to read slowly
and thoughtfully if you can. Maybe you'll get it this time:

From the Washington Post (for the benefit of Nomen Nescio):

"While just 4 percent of Trump's supporters say they would back someone
else if there was a redo of the election, fully 15 percent of Clinton
supporters say they would ditch her. Trump leads in a re-do of the 2016
election 43 percent to 40 percent after losing the popular vote 46-44."

... Aaron Blake April 23 - Washington Post


Why are you wasting your time with this anonymous asshole?



You're right.