BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Washington Post poll (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/174172-re-washington-post-poll.html)

Nomen Nescio April 25th 17 10:27 PM

Washington Post poll
 
So, you didn't type this? I'd rather not be able to read than be
dumber than a post.. in this case, yours.

"I provided you a direct quote from the Wash Post today in another
post."

The Examiner quote referenced the "second to last paragraph".
Not me.


As I said, you're a liar.


Mr. Luddite April 25th 17 11:08 PM

Washington Post poll
 
On 4/25/2017 5:27 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
So, you didn't type this? I'd rather not be able to read than be
dumber than a post.. in this case, yours.

"I provided you a direct quote from the Wash Post today in another
post."

The Examiner quote referenced the "second to last paragraph".
Not me.


As I said, you're a liar.



Give up man. I "did" provide you a direct quote from the Wash Post.

Here ... I'll repeat it again for the *third* time. Try to read slowly
and thoughtfully if you can. Maybe you'll get it this time:

From the Washington Post (for the benefit of Nomen Nescio):

"While just 4 percent of Trump's supporters say they would back someone
else if there was a redo of the election, fully 15 percent of Clinton
supporters say they would ditch her. Trump leads in a re-do of the 2016
election 43 percent to 40 percent after losing the popular vote 46-44."

.... Aaron Blake April 23 - Washington Post



[email protected] April 26th 17 03:11 AM

Washington Post poll
 
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:08:57 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/25/2017 5:27 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
So, you didn't type this? I'd rather not be able to read than be
dumber than a post.. in this case, yours.

"I provided you a direct quote from the Wash Post today in another
post."

The Examiner quote referenced the "second to last paragraph".
Not me.


As I said, you're a liar.



Give up man. I "did" provide you a direct quote from the Wash Post.

Here ... I'll repeat it again for the *third* time. Try to read slowly
and thoughtfully if you can. Maybe you'll get it this time:

From the Washington Post (for the benefit of Nomen Nescio):

"While just 4 percent of Trump's supporters say they would back someone
else if there was a redo of the election, fully 15 percent of Clinton
supporters say they would ditch her. Trump leads in a re-do of the 2016
election 43 percent to 40 percent after losing the popular vote 46-44."

... Aaron Blake April 23 - Washington Post


Why are you wasting your time with this anonymous asshole?

Mr. Luddite April 26th 17 04:46 AM

Washington Post poll
 
On 4/25/2017 10:11 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:08:57 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/25/2017 5:27 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
So, you didn't type this? I'd rather not be able to read than be
dumber than a post.. in this case, yours.

"I provided you a direct quote from the Wash Post today in another
post."

The Examiner quote referenced the "second to last paragraph".
Not me.

As I said, you're a liar.



Give up man. I "did" provide you a direct quote from the Wash Post.

Here ... I'll repeat it again for the *third* time. Try to read slowly
and thoughtfully if you can. Maybe you'll get it this time:

From the Washington Post (for the benefit of Nomen Nescio):

"While just 4 percent of Trump's supporters say they would back someone
else if there was a redo of the election, fully 15 percent of Clinton
supporters say they would ditch her. Trump leads in a re-do of the 2016
election 43 percent to 40 percent after losing the popular vote 46-44."

... Aaron Blake April 23 - Washington Post


Why are you wasting your time with this anonymous asshole?



You're right.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com