Interesting that some bozo posts a link and didn't read the
article. He got his bull**** from the Washington Examiner, and
didn't even read the Washington Post story or is too ****ing stupid
to understand what he read.

Also interesting that instead of making a coherent argument in
favor of whatever ****ing moronic thing they believe, these right
wing asshats make a personal attack.

Well, here's my personal attack... you're a bunch of lard-ass ****-
for-brains bozos that probably need help tying your shoes. Either
that or someone took pitty on you and switched all your shoes to
Velco.

On 4/24/2017 3:45 AM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Interesting that some bozo posts a link and didn't read the
article. He got his bull**** from the Washington Examiner, and
didn't even read the Washington Post story or is too ****ing stupid
to understand what he read.

Also interesting that instead of making a coherent argument in
favor of whatever ****ing moronic thing they believe, these right
wing asshats make a personal attack.

Well, here's my personal attack... you're a bunch of lard-ass ****-
for-brains bozos that probably need help tying your shoes. Either
that or someone took pitty on you and switched all your shoes to
Velco.



You might want to re-read the Wash Post article and think about what it
says. I posted the link for you.

On 4/24/2017 3:45 AM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Interesting that some bozo posts a link and didn't read the
article. He got his bull**** from the Washington Examiner, and
didn't even read the Washington Post story or is too ****ing stupid
to understand what he read.

Also interesting that instead of making a coherent argument in
favor of whatever ****ing moronic thing they believe, these right
wing asshats make a personal attack.

Well, here's my personal attack... you're a bunch of lard-ass ****-
for-brains bozos that probably need help tying your shoes. Either
that or someone took pitty on you and switched all your shoes to
Velco.



Felt bad for you so I thought maybe I'd explain in simple language
what the Wash Post poll said.

It didn't say more people would vote for Trump if the election where
held today.

It said that of those who voted for Trump, 98 percent would do so again.
Of those who voted for Hillary, 85 percent would do so again.

Means Hillary lost 15 percent of her support and votes.
Trump lost 2 percent of his support and votes.

Trump would win both the electoral and popular vote according to this poll.

Speaking of personal attacks, your new DNC chairman is sure doing a bang
up job, huh? What are Democrats thinking?

Suggest you retire to your safe room and suck your thumb for a while
until you feel better.

On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 3:54:09 AM UTC-4, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Interesting that some bozo posts a link and didn't read the
article. He got his bull**** from the Washington Examiner, and
didn't even read the Washington Post story or is too ****ing stupid
to understand what he read.

Also interesting that instead of making a coherent argument in
favor of whatever ****ing moronic thing they believe, these right
wing asshats make a personal attack.

Well, here's my personal attack... you're a bunch of lard-ass ****-
for-brains bozos that probably need help tying your shoes. Either
that or someone took pitty on you and switched all your shoes to
Velco.

Heh. Your entire MO in here is defined as a "personal attack". You're so intent on it that you can't even understand what is written, including the link Luddite provided for you.

Luddite is being patient and trying to explain things to you down on your level. You should thank him.

On 4/25/2017 4:45 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 3:54:09 AM UTC-4, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Interesting that some bozo posts a link and didn't read the
article. He got his bull**** from the Washington Examiner, and
didn't even read the Washington Post story or is too ****ing stupid
to understand what he read.

Also interesting that instead of making a coherent argument in
favor of whatever ****ing moronic thing they believe, these right
wing asshats make a personal attack.

Well, here's my personal attack... you're a bunch of lard-ass ****-
for-brains bozos that probably need help tying your shoes. Either
that or someone took pitty on you and switched all your shoes to
Velco.



Heh. Your entire MO in here is defined as a "personal attack". You're so intent on it that you can't even understand what is written, including the link Luddite provided for you.

Luddite is being patient and trying to explain things to you down on your level. You should thank him.


Unfortunately he can't even understand what is trying to be explained.

Maybe two cites and attributes in one post is just too much for his
brain to process.

On 4/25/17 4:45 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 3:54:09 AM UTC-4, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Interesting that some bozo posts a link and didn't read the
article. He got his bull**** from the Washington Examiner, and
didn't even read the Washington Post story or is too ****ing stupid
to understand what he read.

Also interesting that instead of making a coherent argument in
favor of whatever ****ing moronic thing they believe, these right
wing asshats make a personal attack.

Well, here's my personal attack... you're a bunch of lard-ass ****-
for-brains bozos that probably need help tying your shoes. Either
that or someone took pitty on you and switched all your shoes to
Velco.

Heh. Your entire MO in here is defined as a "personal attack". You're so intent on it that you can't even understand what is written, including the link Luddite provided for you.

Luddite is being patient and trying to explain things to you down on your level. You should thank him.



And what are you here for, aside from personal attacks, ****head?

Keyser Soze says..m

"And what are you here for, aside from personal attacks, ****head"


Good question...beyond his instigating, agitating, irritating, enabling, aiding and abetting...I would guess imitating Julia Child, camping and gun fondling.

On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 5:07:16 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
Keyser Soze says..m

"And what are you here for, aside from personal attacks, ****head"


Good question...beyond his instigating, agitating, irritating, enabling, aiding and abetting...I would guess imitating Julia Child, camping and gun fondling.

Good boy. Oh, and I don't camp, genius.

JackOff erupts..

"Good boy. Â*Oh, and I don't camp, genius."


My mistake, thought Harry was talking to The John.
On the other hand, since you're one of his stinkest turds, I'm sure a number of the descriptors apply to you.

True North wrote:
Keyser Soze says..m

"And what are you here for, aside from personal attacks, ****head"


Good question...beyond his instigating, agitating, irritating, enabling,
aiding and abetting...I would guess imitating Julia Child, camping and gun fondling.


Same question re. You and Harry.