Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
.... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
On 4/9/17 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. Two irrational leaders who have nuclear weapons playing brinkmanship...what could possibly go wrong? Well, aside from nuclear war? |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy? You are delusional. |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
On 4/9/2017 8:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. If your concern is a confrontation with one of our adversaries that could lead to WWIII and given Hillary's recent comments regarding what she would do in Syria, you should feel safer with Trump so far. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
On 4/9/17 10:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. If your concern is a confrontation with one of our adversaries that could lead to WWIII and given Hillary's recent comments regarding what she would do in Syria, you should feel safer with Trump so far. What matters is that Hillary is not ignorant, intellectually lazy, a loudmouth, inexperienced in diplomacy, and the laughing stock of our allies, and your boy Trump is all of these. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
On 4/9/17 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy? You are delusional. We're talking about two lunatics, Kim and Trump, dummy. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 20:05:48 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:
The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. I am not convinced that Trump is not going to work a deal with Putin and Xi. I just fear the rest of the world might not like it. They might end up saying China will step on N Korea if we let them have the islands in the South China Sea, maybe Tibet and a bigger stake in Taiwan. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Carrier Strike Force 1 ...
On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 12:26:42 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 20:05:48 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. I am not convinced that Trump is not going to work a deal with Putin and Xi. I just fear the rest of the world might not like it. They might end up saying China will step on N Korea if we let them have the islands in the South China Sea, maybe Tibet and a bigger stake in Taiwan. I think that China has had Tibet since about 1950 or so. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Strike Two- Narragansett RI | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Lightning Strike | Cruising | |||
Lightning Strike | ASA | |||
OT Strike Two, BushCo | General | |||
40hp Force carrier bearing assembly | General |