Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() .... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy? You are delusional. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/9/17 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy? You are delusional. We're talking about two lunatics, Kim and Trump, dummy. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 10:48:06 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy? You are delusional. We're talking about two lunatics, Kim and Trump, dummy. WWIII will not be between Kim and the US, dummy. It would involve Russia, and it's not going to happen, ****head. You got it, dipwad? |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/9/2017 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy? You are delusional. It's because the term "drone" is not offensive to progressive liberals. They are already complaining and protesting that "Tomahawk" is offensive to native Americans. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/10/17 6:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy? You are delusional. It's because the term "drone" is not offensive to progressive liberals. They are already complaining and protesting that "Tomahawk" is offensive to native Americans. Jackoff didn't realize I was discussing the two nutcases, the POTUS and the leader of North Korea, I suppose. I wasn't talking about Trump's attack on Syria. You obviously pay a lot more attention to "progressive liberals" than I do. I haven't read a peep of complaint about the Tomahawk descriptor. By the way, all liberals are progressive. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/9/2017 8:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. If your concern is a confrontation with one of our adversaries that could lead to WWIII and given Hillary's recent comments regarding what she would do in Syria, you should feel safer with Trump so far. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/9/17 10:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: ... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a station off the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call but were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not reported but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke sub. The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit. I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than Donald Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker, instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy, ignorant, short-termed idiot as president. If your concern is a confrontation with one of our adversaries that could lead to WWIII and given Hillary's recent comments regarding what she would do in Syria, you should feel safer with Trump so far. What matters is that Hillary is not ignorant, intellectually lazy, a loudmouth, inexperienced in diplomacy, and the laughing stock of our allies, and your boy Trump is all of these. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Strike Two- Narragansett RI | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Lightning Strike | Cruising | |||
Lightning Strike | ASA | |||
OT Strike Two, BushCo | General | |||
40hp Force carrier bearing assembly | General |