![]() |
We're here for your oil...
On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 4:18:05 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 4:11 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 4:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 3:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:14:31 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as anyone. It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes. Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. That is not what you were talking about. So now you admit "10 million" was simply off topic bull****? Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. Most of the time, I post in straight, standard English, sentences, and I deliberately write *here* at a level that even a junior high school kid can understand. It's really not my fault if rec.boats is infested with a handful of posters who cannot read and understand English sentences without their political triggers being pulled. If you're so friggin' precise in your writing, why do you get caught in so many lies? |
We're here for your oil...
On 1/25/17 1:53 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:43:55 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 9:39 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:11:29 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: Greg responds to comments with thoughtful responses. How about you? I've not seen you engage in debate with anyone. So it's not clear that you even know the definition of debate. Evidently at KU, saying **** you and kicking over the rostrum was seen as a valid retort. I've told you many times I don't consider this a valid debate or serious discussion forum, and I don't consider you a serious debater, what with your endless fantasy projections. Why bother? Cop out I was being nice. I'm a cynic, but, hell, you have nothing but disdain for every person who has served as president going back to at least FDR. I don't expect perfection from any politician and I don't expect them to agree with me on any number of issues and when they don't, I can still admire some of them and what they've done, and consider them a good president. You're the same on many issues, especially those issues that might take a dollar or two out of your wallet. I see no reason to engage in debate with someone like that. It's a waste of my time. And that is aside from the fact that rec.boats is a trash dump full of right-wing intellectual ciphers. |
We're here for your oil...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 06:39:16 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/25/17 1:53 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:43:55 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 9:39 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:11:29 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: Greg responds to comments with thoughtful responses. How about you? I've not seen you engage in debate with anyone. So it's not clear that you even know the definition of debate. Evidently at KU, saying **** you and kicking over the rostrum was seen as a valid retort. I've told you many times I don't consider this a valid debate or serious discussion forum, and I don't consider you a serious debater, what with your endless fantasy projections. Why bother? Cop out I was being nice. I'm a cynic, but, hell, you have nothing but disdain for every person who has served as president going back to at least FDR. I don't expect perfection from any politician and I don't expect them to agree with me on any number of issues and when they don't, I can still admire some of them and what they've done, and consider them a good president. You're the same on many issues, especially those issues that might take a dollar or two out of your wallet. I see no reason to engage in debate with someone like that. It's a waste of my time. And that is aside from the fact that rec.boats is a trash dump full of right-wing intellectual ciphers. ....from which you promised to leave. Another lie, Krause? |
We're here for your oil...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 06:39:16 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: I was being nice. I'm a cynic, but, hell, you have nothing but disdain for every person who has served as president going back to at least FDR. I don't expect perfection from any politician and I don't expect them to agree with me on any number of issues and when they don't, I can still admire some of them and what they've done, and consider them a good president. You're the same on many issues, especially those issues that might take a dollar or two out of your wallet. I see no reason to engage in debate with someone like that. It's a waste of my time. And that is aside from the fact that rec.boats is a trash dump full of right-wing intellectual ciphers. You're slipping in your old age. You forgot to mention "Deplorables". :-) |
We're here for your oil...
On 1/25/17 11:43 AM, justan wrote:
Poco Deplorevole Wrote in message: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:42:40 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 9:37 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:45:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 5:49 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball team when I am debating with Harry. Debate? You don't know how to debate. I am still better than you at it tho. At least I try to answer with well researched, cogent arguments and not ad hominem attacks. You don't seem to be capable of reading the premise nor will you answer in any responsive way. No, I just don't take this right-wing hellhole seriously. Departure is always an option. But then Greg won't have anyone to kick around, and we'll have much less to laugh at. We could watch Abbot and Costello eepisodes as an alternative. You could go back to high school, try to get a GED, and videotape your efforts. |
We're here for your oil...
Keyser Soze
On 1/25/17 11:43 AM, justan wrote: Poco Deplorevole Wrote in message: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:42:40 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 9:37 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:45:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 5:49 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball team when I am debating with Harry. Debate? You don't know how to debate. I am still better than you at it tho. At least I try to answer with well researched, cogent arguments and not ad hominem attacks. You don't seem to be capable of reading the premise nor will you answer in any responsive way. No, I just don't take this right-wing hellhole seriously. Departure is always an option. But then Greg won't have anyone to kick around, and we'll have much less to laugh at. We could watch Abbot and Costello eepisodes as an alternative. "You could go back to high school, try to get a GED, and videotape your efforts." SNERK! Careful you'll get Justine upset. |
We're here for your oil...
True North wrote:
Keyser Soze On 1/25/17 11:43 AM, justan wrote: Poco Deplorevole Wrote in message: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:42:40 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 9:37 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:45:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 5:49 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball team when I am debating with Harry. Debate? You don't know how to debate. I am still better than you at it tho. At least I try to answer with well researched, cogent arguments and not ad hominem attacks. You don't seem to be capable of reading the premise nor will you answer in any responsive way. No, I just don't take this right-wing hellhole seriously. Departure is always an option. But then Greg won't have anyone to kick around, and we'll have much less to laugh at. We could watch Abbot and Costello eepisodes as an alternative. "You could go back to high school, try to get a GED, and videotape your efforts." SNERK! Careful you'll get Justine upset. Did you become a janitor, because you dropped out of high school? |
We're here for your oil...
Kalif Swill guzzles..
"Did you become a janitor, because you dropped out of high school?" Did you become illiterate because you threw yourself off a roof and on to your head? |
We're here for your oil...
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles.. "Did you become a janitor, because you dropped out of high school?" Did you become illiterate because you threw yourself off a roof and on to your head? Too misrepresentations in one sentence. You are good at being an idiot. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com