We're here for your oil...
 

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:05:54 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 1/24/17 3:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:14:31 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10
million votes

2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency.

For the math challenged liberal arts majors

Hillary 65,845,063
Trump 62,980,160
---------------------
margin 2,864,903
not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding.



Add in the third party votes...

You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown
away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as
anyone.
It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play
your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes.


Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump
lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes.

That is not what you were talking about.

So now you admit "10 million" was simply off topic bull****?


Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that
fits what you want it to fit?

It really seems that you were the one doing the twisting with the "10
million" number but I understand you heard Rachel or some other MSNBC
talking head say it and you couldn't help yourself.
You threw out a number that included 3d parties and I showed you the
flaw in that logic.

We're here for your oil...
 

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:06:12 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 1/24/17 3:58 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:18:12 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

3? A moment a go you said 10. Harry maybe you should quit common core..,

He is just parroting talking points he gets from MSNBC who cater to
their history challenged, low information viewers


Uh, no. Again.

If that was an original thought, it was even a dumber thing to say if
you understood anything about history.

We're here for your oil...
 

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that
fits what you want it to fit?

Maybe he's having a contest with you.

It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball
team when I am debating with Harry.

We're here for your oil...
 

On 1/24/17 5:49 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that
fits what you want it to fit?

Maybe he's having a contest with you.

It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball
team when I am debating with Harry.


Debate? You don't know how to debate.

We're here for your oil...
 

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:45:07 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 1/24/17 5:49 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that
fits what you want it to fit?

Maybe he's having a contest with you.

It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball
team when I am debating with Harry.


Debate? You don't know how to debate.

I am still better than you at it tho.
At least I try to answer with well researched, cogent arguments and
not ad hominem attacks. You don't seem to be capable of reading the
premise nor will you answer in any responsive way.

We're here for your oil...
 

On 1/24/17 9:37 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:45:07 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 1/24/17 5:49 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that
fits what you want it to fit?

Maybe he's having a contest with you.

It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball
team when I am debating with Harry.


Debate? You don't know how to debate.

I am still better than you at it tho.
At least I try to answer with well researched, cogent arguments and
not ad hominem attacks. You don't seem to be capable of reading the
premise nor will you answer in any responsive way.


No, I just don't take this right-wing hellhole seriously.

We're here for your oil...
 

On 1/24/17 9:39 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:11:29 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:

Greg responds to comments with thoughtful responses. How about you?
I've not seen you engage in debate with anyone.
So it's not clear that you even know the definition of debate.

Evidently at KU, saying **** you and kicking over the rostrum was seen
as a valid retort.


I've told you many times I don't consider this a valid debate or serious
discussion forum, and I don't consider you a serious debater, what with
your endless fantasy projections. Why bother?

We're here for your oil...
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10
million votes

2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency.

For the math challenged liberal arts majors

Hillary 65,845,063
Trump 62,980,160
---------------------
margin 2,864,903
not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding.



Add in the third party votes...

You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown
away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as
anyone.
It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play
your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes.


Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump
lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes.


Clinton only got 43% first time through. He probably still sends a
Christmas card to Ross.

We're here for your oil...
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 4:11 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/24/2017 4:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 3:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:14:31 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by
about 10
million votes

2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency.

For the math challenged liberal arts majors

Hillary 65,845,063
Trump 62,980,160
---------------------
margin 2,864,903
not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding.



Add in the third party votes...

You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown
away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as
anyone.
It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play
your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes.


Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump
lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes.

That is not what you were talking about.

So now you admit "10 million" was simply off topic bull****?





Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that
fits what you want it to fit?

Maybe he's having a contest with you.


Most of the time, I post in straight, standard English, sentences, and I
deliberately write *here* at a level that even a junior high school kid
can understand. It's really not my fault if rec.boats is infested with a
handful of posters who cannot read and understand English sentences
without their political triggers being pulled.



That is really deep BS!

We're here for your oil...
 

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:43:55 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 1/24/17 9:39 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:11:29 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:

Greg responds to comments with thoughtful responses. How about you?
I've not seen you engage in debate with anyone.
So it's not clear that you even know the definition of debate.

Evidently at KU, saying **** you and kicking over the rostrum was seen
as a valid retort.


I've told you many times I don't consider this a valid debate or serious
discussion forum, and I don't consider you a serious debater, what with
your endless fantasy projections. Why bother?

Cop out