| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
We're here for your oil...
|
We're here for your oil...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... Subtract the illegal votes... |
We're here for your oil...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as anyone. It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes. |
We're here for your oil...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:01:26 -0500, Poco Deplorevole
wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... Subtract the illegal votes... This may be the first election in history where someone actually investigates the illegal vote. Usually the party that won, puts the victory in their pocket and has no interest in looking back but Trump has popped off about the illegal vote so often, he may be forced to try to find them. I have mentioned and cited many times the simple little investigation our TV station did where they had no problem finding aliens voting. They just compared the voter rolls with people refusing jury duty because they were not citizens and then investigated from there. No matter how that comes out, an illegal act was committed. The ones they reported were actually aliens on the voter rolls and they admitted it on camera. If there are dozens in a small county in SW Florida, who knows how many there are nation wide and that was just one way of looking for them. Maybe it would also be worth looking at the SS "death" data base and comparing that to the voter rolls too. I know I was still getting voter information for my mom long after she died and it would have been very easy to send back the card requesting an absentee ballot. As long as you keep voting, you stay on the rolls. |
We're here for your oil...
On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as anyone. It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes. Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. |
We're here for your oil...
12:14 PMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text - Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. .... 3? A moment a go you said 10. Harry maybe you should quit common core.., |
We're here for your oil...
On 1/24/17 1:18 PM, Tim wrote:
12:14 PMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. ... 3? A moment a go you said 10. Harry maybe you should quit common core.., Whoosh! |
We're here for your oil...
On 1/24/2017 1:18 PM, Tim wrote:
12:14 PMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. ... 3? A moment a go you said 10. Harry maybe you should quit common core.., He's playing games with numbers and semantics again. |
We're here for your oil...
On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 1:50:24 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/24/2017 1:18 PM, Tim wrote: 12:14 PMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. ... 3? A moment a go you said 10. Harry maybe you should quit common core.., He's playing games with numbers and semantics again. Stupid games. You don't magically get to add third party votes to your losing candidate's tally. |
We're here for your oil...
12:50 PMMr. Luddite
- show quoted text - He's playing games with numbers and semantics again. .... I didn't expect any different. |
We're here for your oil...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:14:31 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as anyone. It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes. Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. That is not what you were talking about. So now you admit "10 million" was simply off topic bull****? |
We're here for your oil...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:18:12 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: 3? A moment a go you said 10. Harry maybe you should quit common core.., He is just parroting talking points he gets from MSNBC who cater to their history challenged, low information viewers |
We're here for your oil...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:44:52 -0800 (PST), Its Me
wrote: He's playing games with numbers and semantics again. Stupid games. You don't magically get to add third party votes to your losing candidate's tally. That is especially true when a significant number of those 3d party voters came from the, would be, democrats. (Bernie voters who believed what he said about Hillary.) |
We're here for your oil...
On 1/24/17 3:52 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:14:31 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as anyone. It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes. Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. That is not what you were talking about. So now you admit "10 million" was simply off topic bull****? Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? |
We're here for your oil...
|
We're here for your oil...
On 1/24/2017 4:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 3:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:14:31 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as anyone. It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes. Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. That is not what you were talking about. So now you admit "10 million" was simply off topic bull****? Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. |
We're here for your oil...
On 1/24/17 4:11 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/24/2017 4:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 3:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:14:31 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as anyone. It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes. Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. That is not what you were talking about. So now you admit "10 million" was simply off topic bull****? Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. Most of the time, I post in straight, standard English, sentences, and I deliberately write *here* at a level that even a junior high school kid can understand. It's really not my fault if rec.boats is infested with a handful of posters who cannot read and understand English sentences without their political triggers being pulled. |
We're here for your oil...
3:05 PMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text - Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? ..... Because you do and make it look so easy? |
We're here for your oil...
On 1/24/2017 4:18 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 4:11 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 4:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 3:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:14:31 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as anyone. It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes. Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. That is not what you were talking about. So now you admit "10 million" was simply off topic bull****? Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. Most of the time, I post in straight, standard English, sentences, and I deliberately write *here* at a level that even a junior high school kid can understand. It's really not my fault if rec.boats is infested with a handful of posters who cannot read and understand English sentences without their political triggers being pulled. ha ha. Your reputation precedes you. |
We're here for your oil...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:05:54 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 1/24/17 3:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:14:31 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as anyone. It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes. Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. That is not what you were talking about. So now you admit "10 million" was simply off topic bull****? Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? It really seems that you were the one doing the twisting with the "10 million" number but I understand you heard Rachel or some other MSNBC talking head say it and you couldn't help yourself. You threw out a number that included 3d parties and I showed you the flaw in that logic. |
We're here for your oil...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:06:12 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 1/24/17 3:58 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:18:12 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: 3? A moment a go you said 10. Harry maybe you should quit common core.., He is just parroting talking points he gets from MSNBC who cater to their history challenged, low information viewers Uh, no. Again. If that was an original thought, it was even a dumber thing to say if you understood anything about history. |
We're here for your oil...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball team when I am debating with Harry. |
We're here for your oil...
|
We're here for your oil...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:45:07 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 1/24/17 5:49 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball team when I am debating with Harry. Debate? You don't know how to debate. I am still better than you at it tho. At least I try to answer with well researched, cogent arguments and not ad hominem attacks. You don't seem to be capable of reading the premise nor will you answer in any responsive way. |
We're here for your oil...
On 1/24/17 9:37 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:45:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 5:49 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball team when I am debating with Harry. Debate? You don't know how to debate. I am still better than you at it tho. At least I try to answer with well researched, cogent arguments and not ad hominem attacks. You don't seem to be capable of reading the premise nor will you answer in any responsive way. No, I just don't take this right-wing hellhole seriously. |
We're here for your oil...
|
We're here for your oil...
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as anyone. It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes. Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. Clinton only got 43% first time through. He probably still sends a Christmas card to Ross. |
We're here for your oil...
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 4:11 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 4:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 3:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:14:31 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as anyone. It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes. Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. That is not what you were talking about. So now you admit "10 million" was simply off topic bull****? Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. Most of the time, I post in straight, standard English, sentences, and I deliberately write *here* at a level that even a junior high school kid can understand. It's really not my fault if rec.boats is infested with a handful of posters who cannot read and understand English sentences without their political triggers being pulled. That is really deep BS! |
We're here for your oil...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:43:55 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 1/24/17 9:39 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:11:29 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: Greg responds to comments with thoughtful responses. How about you? I've not seen you engage in debate with anyone. So it's not clear that you even know the definition of debate. Evidently at KU, saying **** you and kicking over the rostrum was seen as a valid retort. I've told you many times I don't consider this a valid debate or serious discussion forum, and I don't consider you a serious debater, what with your endless fantasy projections. Why bother? Cop out |
We're here for your oil...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:42:40 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 9:37 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:45:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 5:49 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball team when I am debating with Harry. Debate? You don't know how to debate. I am still better than you at it tho. At least I try to answer with well researched, cogent arguments and not ad hominem attacks. You don't seem to be capable of reading the premise nor will you answer in any responsive way. No, I just don't take this right-wing hellhole seriously. Departure is always an option. But then Greg won't have anyone to kick around, and we'll have much less to laugh at. |
We're here for your oil...
On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 4:18:05 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/24/17 4:11 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/24/2017 4:05 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 3:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:14:31 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 12:55 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:08:58 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 2:03 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:42:22 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:48:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: It's important to remember that Trump lost the popular vote by about 10 million votes 2.9 million becomes 10 million? talk about false equivalency. For the math challenged liberal arts majors Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 --------------------- margin 2,864,903 not even 2.9 million but we will allow the rounding. Add in the third party votes... You have been telling us all along that those votes were just thrown away and if anything they were voting against Hillary as much as anyone. It is strange how you like to twist these numbers around but if I play your game, Bill lost the 92 election by 20 million votes. Bill beat his Republican opponent by four or five million votes. Trump lost to his Democratic opponent by three million votes. That is not what you were talking about. So now you admit "10 million" was simply off topic bull****? Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. Most of the time, I post in straight, standard English, sentences, and I deliberately write *here* at a level that even a junior high school kid can understand. It's really not my fault if rec.boats is infested with a handful of posters who cannot read and understand English sentences without their political triggers being pulled. If you're so friggin' precise in your writing, why do you get caught in so many lies? |
We're here for your oil...
On 1/25/17 1:53 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:43:55 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 9:39 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:11:29 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: Greg responds to comments with thoughtful responses. How about you? I've not seen you engage in debate with anyone. So it's not clear that you even know the definition of debate. Evidently at KU, saying **** you and kicking over the rostrum was seen as a valid retort. I've told you many times I don't consider this a valid debate or serious discussion forum, and I don't consider you a serious debater, what with your endless fantasy projections. Why bother? Cop out I was being nice. I'm a cynic, but, hell, you have nothing but disdain for every person who has served as president going back to at least FDR. I don't expect perfection from any politician and I don't expect them to agree with me on any number of issues and when they don't, I can still admire some of them and what they've done, and consider them a good president. You're the same on many issues, especially those issues that might take a dollar or two out of your wallet. I see no reason to engage in debate with someone like that. It's a waste of my time. And that is aside from the fact that rec.boats is a trash dump full of right-wing intellectual ciphers. |
We're here for your oil...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 06:39:16 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/25/17 1:53 AM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:43:55 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 9:39 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:11:29 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: Greg responds to comments with thoughtful responses. How about you? I've not seen you engage in debate with anyone. So it's not clear that you even know the definition of debate. Evidently at KU, saying **** you and kicking over the rostrum was seen as a valid retort. I've told you many times I don't consider this a valid debate or serious discussion forum, and I don't consider you a serious debater, what with your endless fantasy projections. Why bother? Cop out I was being nice. I'm a cynic, but, hell, you have nothing but disdain for every person who has served as president going back to at least FDR. I don't expect perfection from any politician and I don't expect them to agree with me on any number of issues and when they don't, I can still admire some of them and what they've done, and consider them a good president. You're the same on many issues, especially those issues that might take a dollar or two out of your wallet. I see no reason to engage in debate with someone like that. It's a waste of my time. And that is aside from the fact that rec.boats is a trash dump full of right-wing intellectual ciphers. ....from which you promised to leave. Another lie, Krause? |
We're here for your oil...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 06:39:16 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: I was being nice. I'm a cynic, but, hell, you have nothing but disdain for every person who has served as president going back to at least FDR. I don't expect perfection from any politician and I don't expect them to agree with me on any number of issues and when they don't, I can still admire some of them and what they've done, and consider them a good president. You're the same on many issues, especially those issues that might take a dollar or two out of your wallet. I see no reason to engage in debate with someone like that. It's a waste of my time. And that is aside from the fact that rec.boats is a trash dump full of right-wing intellectual ciphers. You're slipping in your old age. You forgot to mention "Deplorables". :-) |
We're here for your oil...
On 1/25/17 11:43 AM, justan wrote:
Poco Deplorevole Wrote in message: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:42:40 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 9:37 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:45:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 5:49 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball team when I am debating with Harry. Debate? You don't know how to debate. I am still better than you at it tho. At least I try to answer with well researched, cogent arguments and not ad hominem attacks. You don't seem to be capable of reading the premise nor will you answer in any responsive way. No, I just don't take this right-wing hellhole seriously. Departure is always an option. But then Greg won't have anyone to kick around, and we'll have much less to laugh at. We could watch Abbot and Costello eepisodes as an alternative. You could go back to high school, try to get a GED, and videotape your efforts. |
We're here for your oil...
Keyser Soze
On 1/25/17 11:43 AM, justan wrote: Poco Deplorevole Wrote in message: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:42:40 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 9:37 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:45:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 5:49 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball team when I am debating with Harry. Debate? You don't know how to debate. I am still better than you at it tho. At least I try to answer with well researched, cogent arguments and not ad hominem attacks. You don't seem to be capable of reading the premise nor will you answer in any responsive way. No, I just don't take this right-wing hellhole seriously. Departure is always an option. But then Greg won't have anyone to kick around, and we'll have much less to laugh at. We could watch Abbot and Costello eepisodes as an alternative. "You could go back to high school, try to get a GED, and videotape your efforts." SNERK! Careful you'll get Justine upset. |
We're here for your oil...
True North wrote:
Keyser Soze On 1/25/17 11:43 AM, justan wrote: Poco Deplorevole Wrote in message: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:42:40 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 9:37 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:45:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 1/24/17 5:49 PM, wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:11:33 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Why do you work so hard to twist what others post into something that fits what you want it to fit? Maybe he's having a contest with you. It is not a contest. I feel like the 1992 olympic men's basketball team when I am debating with Harry. Debate? You don't know how to debate. I am still better than you at it tho. At least I try to answer with well researched, cogent arguments and not ad hominem attacks. You don't seem to be capable of reading the premise nor will you answer in any responsive way. No, I just don't take this right-wing hellhole seriously. Departure is always an option. But then Greg won't have anyone to kick around, and we'll have much less to laugh at. We could watch Abbot and Costello eepisodes as an alternative. "You could go back to high school, try to get a GED, and videotape your efforts." SNERK! Careful you'll get Justine upset. Did you become a janitor, because you dropped out of high school? |
We're here for your oil...
Kalif Swill guzzles..
"Did you become a janitor, because you dropped out of high school?" Did you become illiterate because you threw yourself off a roof and on to your head? |
We're here for your oil...
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles.. "Did you become a janitor, because you dropped out of high school?" Did you become illiterate because you threw yourself off a roof and on to your head? Too misrepresentations in one sentence. You are good at being an idiot. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:33 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com