Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/8/16, 5:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/7/2016 9:39 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:17:36 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Comey never said HRC lied to Congress. That makes you a a low-down liar. He never said she "lied" but he did say some of her testimony was not true. Semantics. She testified under oath. Comey said that some of her testimony was not true. How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying? The above has been brought to you by the Save the Lemmings Foundation. Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of course, part of the liberal arts. "How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying?", you ask. Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck, this is rec.boats. What difference does it make? ![]() Even those with high school diplomas or a GED took English and understand semantics. Liberals majors seem to learn to ignore meanings that do not conform to their preconceived notions. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/8/16, 1:07 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/8/16, 5:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/7/2016 9:39 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:17:36 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: Comey never said HRC lied to Congress. That makes you a a low-down liar. He never said she "lied" but he did say some of her testimony was not true. Semantics. She testified under oath. Comey said that some of her testimony was not true. How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying? The above has been brought to you by the Save the Lemmings Foundation. Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of course, part of the liberal arts. "How can you make specific statements under oath that are not true and not be lying?", you ask. Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck, this is rec.boats. What difference does it make? ![]() Even those with high school diplomas or a GED took English and understand semantics. Liberals majors seem to learn to ignore meanings that do not conform to their preconceived notions. Thanks for the comic relief you supply here. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
House Questions Comey | General |