On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 3:28:12 AM UTC-4, Boating All Out wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

Trey Gowdy ripped him apart. The double standard is clear. She had intent and conspired to conceal.

Go ahead and vote for a criminal if you must.

On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 6:14:09 AM UTC-5, Its Me wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 3:28:12 AM UTC-4, Boating All Out wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

Trey Gowdy ripped him apart. The double standard is clear. She had intent and conspired to conceal.

Go ahead and vote for a criminal if you must.

http://ijr.com/2016/07/644981-trey-g...&utm_term=prm6

On 7/8/16 7:59 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 6:14:09 AM UTC-5, Its Me wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 3:28:12 AM UTC-4, Boating All Out wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

Trey Gowdy ripped him apart. The double standard is clear. She had intent and conspired to conceal.

Go ahead and vote for a criminal if you must.

http://ijr.com/2016/07/644981-trey-g...&utm_term=prm6


I'm sorry, but what crimes has Mrs. Clinton been charged with or
convicted of? Answer: none. Your boy Trump is a lot closer to the bar of
criminal justice.

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:05:20 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


I'm sorry, but what crimes has Mrs. Clinton been charged with or
convicted of? Answer: none. Your boy Trump is a lot closer to the bar of
criminal justice.

They reran the whole hearing last night. I watched Comey explain his
position. The thing that was consistent was that he stood by his
assessment that Hillary was "extremely careless" with national secrets
and that someone in her position should know better about what she was
sending and receiving.
When asked about presumptive penalties he stayed with "administrative
sanctions" and when questioned about them he said that included loss
of security clearance and being fired or moved to a position that does
not involve sensitive information.
OK by me.
If they want to make her secretary of HSS or Education, I am fine with
it but president is not a good fit for a careless person, whether that
is Hillary or Trump.

It was interesting to hear what the democrat members were saying. They
either tried to pivot to the police shootings or said some variation
of "what difference does it make"?

He did answer the direct question "did you ever think this was a witch
hunt" by saying no. He also said the only reason he took this up was
because of a direct request by the IG. The FBI does not respond to
things they see on TV.

On 7/8/16 12:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:05:20 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


I'm sorry, but what crimes has Mrs. Clinton been charged with or
convicted of? Answer: none. Your boy Trump is a lot closer to the bar of
criminal justice.

They reran the whole hearing last night. I watched Comey explain his
position. The thing that was consistent was that he stood by his
assessment that Hillary was "extremely careless" with national secrets
and that someone in her position should know better about what she was
sending and receiving.
When asked about presumptive penalties he stayed with "administrative
sanctions" and when questioned about them he said that included loss
of security clearance and being fired or moved to a position that does
not involve sensitive information.
OK by me.
If they want to make her secretary of HSS or Education, I am fine with
it but president is not a good fit for a careless person, whether that
is Hillary or Trump.

It was interesting to hear what the democrat members were saying. They
either tried to pivot to the police shootings or said some variation
of "what difference does it make"?

He did answer the direct question "did you ever think this was a witch
hunt" by saying no. He also said the only reason he took this up was
because of a direct request by the IG. The FBI does not respond to
things they see on TV.



I'm sorry...what crimes did Mrs. Clinton been charged with or convicted of?

wrote:

On 7/8/16 12:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:05:20 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


I'm sorry, but what crimes has Mrs. Clinton been charged with or
convicted of? Answer: none. Your boy Trump is a lot closer to the bar of
criminal justice.

They reran the whole hearing last night. I watched Comey explain his
position. The thing that was consistent was that he stood by his
assessment that Hillary was "extremely careless" with national secrets
and that someone in her position should know better about what she was
sending and receiving.
When asked about presumptive penalties he stayed with "administrative
sanctions" and when questioned about them he said that included loss
of security clearance and being fired or moved to a position that does
not involve sensitive information.
OK by me.
If they want to make her secretary of HSS or Education, I am fine with
it but president is not a good fit for a careless person, whether that
is Hillary or Trump.

It was interesting to hear what the democrat members were saying. They
either tried to pivot to the police shootings or said some variation
of "what difference does it make"?

He did answer the direct question "did you ever think this was a witch
hunt" by saying no. He also said the only reason he took this up was
because of a direct request by the IG. The FBI does not respond to
things they see on TV.



I'm sorry...what crimes did Mrs. Clinton been charged with or convicted of?

None yet.
If there was one (that has not been investigated according to Comey),
it is perjury and obstruction of justice. Terms very familiar to the
Clintons. That was what got Bill impeached.
I am satisfied that she is not qualified to be president simply
because she is extremely careless and negligent.

On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 1:08:33 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:

On 7/8/16 12:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:05:20 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


I'm sorry, but what crimes has Mrs. Clinton been charged with or
convicted of? Answer: none. Your boy Trump is a lot closer to the bar of
criminal justice.

They reran the whole hearing last night. I watched Comey explain his
position. The thing that was consistent was that he stood by his
assessment that Hillary was "extremely careless" with national secrets
and that someone in her position should know better about what she was
sending and receiving.
When asked about presumptive penalties he stayed with "administrative
sanctions" and when questioned about them he said that included loss
of security clearance and being fired or moved to a position that does
not involve sensitive information.
OK by me.
If they want to make her secretary of HSS or Education, I am fine with
it but president is not a good fit for a careless person, whether that
is Hillary or Trump.

It was interesting to hear what the democrat members were saying. They
either tried to pivot to the police shootings or said some variation
of "what difference does it make"?

He did answer the direct question "did you ever think this was a witch
hunt" by saying no. He also said the only reason he took this up was
because of a direct request by the IG. The FBI does not respond to
things they see on TV.



I'm sorry...what crimes did Mrs. Clinton been charged with or convicted of?

None yet.
If there was one (that has not been investigated according to Comey),
it is perjury and obstruction of justice. Terms very familiar to the
Clintons. That was what got Bill impeached.
I am satisfied that she is not qualified to be president simply
because she is extremely careless and negligent.

Besides, one does not have to be charged with a crime and convicted to be a criminal. Hillary is a criminal. No sane, thinking person in this world believes she didn't know what she was doing with that email server, before it came to light and after.

Hillary is a criminal.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/8/16 12:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:05:20 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


I'm sorry, but what crimes has Mrs. Clinton been charged with or
convicted of? Answer: none. Your boy Trump is a lot closer to the bar of
criminal justice.

They reran the whole hearing last night. I watched Comey explain his
position. The thing that was consistent was that he stood by his
assessment that Hillary was "extremely careless" with national secrets
and that someone in her position should know better about what she was
sending and receiving.
When asked about presumptive penalties he stayed with "administrative
sanctions" and when questioned about them he said that included loss
of security clearance and being fired or moved to a position that does
not involve sensitive information.
OK by me.
If they want to make her secretary of HSS or Education, I am fine with
it but president is not a good fit for a careless person, whether that
is Hillary or Trump.

It was interesting to hear what the democrat members were saying. They
either tried to pivot to the police shootings or said some variation
of "what difference does it make"?

He did answer the direct question "did you ever think this was a witch
hunt" by saying no. He also said the only reason he took this up was
because of a direct request by the IG. The FBI does not respond to
things they see on TV.



I'm sorry...what crimes did Mrs. Clinton been charged with or convicted of?




What crime did they Al Capone on?

Califbill Wrote in message:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/8/16 12:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:05:20 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


I'm sorry, but what crimes has Mrs. Clinton been charged with or
convicted of? Answer: none. Your boy Trump is a lot closer to the bar of
criminal justice.

They reran the whole hearing last night. I watched Comey explain his
position. The thing that was consistent was that he stood by his
assessment that Hillary was "extremely careless" with national secrets
and that someone in her position should know better about what she was
sending and receiving.
When asked about presumptive penalties he stayed with "administrative
sanctions" and when questioned about them he said that included loss
of security clearance and being fired or moved to a position that does
not involve sensitive information.
OK by me.
If they want to make her secretary of HSS or Education, I am fine with
it but president is not a good fit for a careless person, whether that
is Hillary or Trump.

It was interesting to hear what the democrat members were saying. They
either tried to pivot to the police shootings or said some variation
of "what difference does it make"?

He did answer the direct question "did you ever think this was a witch
hunt" by saying no. He also said the only reason he took this up was
because of a direct request by the IG. The FBI does not respond to
things they see on TV.



I'm sorry...what crimes did Mrs. Clinton been charged with or convicted of?




What crime did they Al Capone on?



Tax evasion. So why didn't Harry get similar treatment? Fair is fair.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Jul 8Keyser Söze
- show quoted text -
I'm sorry...what crimes did Mrs. Clinton been charged with or convicted of?
.....

Hmmm. I guess we could ask the same about OJ Simpson