On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 8:13:41 AM UTC-4, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 7:02:05 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
Its Me wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 3:28:12 AM UTC-4, Boating All Out wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

Trey Gowdy ripped him apart. The double standard is clear. She had
intent and conspired to conceal.

Go ahead and vote for a criminal if you must.


Gowdy couldn't rip a sheet of toilet paper apart. All he did was once again
demo what a partisan asshole he is.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Are you bi-partisan Harry?

Gowdy did exactly what he set out to do... show how Hillary lied, got Comey to admit it while also admitting she conspired to hide what she'd done, and then made the point that anyone else would face the consequences, but Hilly gets a pass. Made Comey look like a fool.

On 7/8/16 8:30 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 8:13:41 AM UTC-4, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 7:02:05 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
Its Me wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 3:28:12 AM UTC-4, Boating All Out wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

Trey Gowdy ripped him apart. The double standard is clear. She had
intent and conspired to conceal.

Go ahead and vote for a criminal if you must.


Gowdy couldn't rip a sheet of toilet paper apart. All he did was once again
demo what a partisan asshole he is.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Are you bi-partisan Harry?

Gowdy did exactly what he set out to do... show how Hillary lied, got Comey to admit it while also admitting she conspired to hide what she'd done, and then made the point that anyone else would face the consequences, but Hilly gets a pass. Made Comey look like a fool.



Gowdy looks like the twerpy little nothing he is. All he proved was that
his only interest is in continuing his witch hunt.

On 7/8/16 8:13 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 7:02:05 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
Its Me wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 3:28:12 AM UTC-4, Boating All Out wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

Trey Gowdy ripped him apart. The double standard is clear. She had
intent and conspired to conceal.

Go ahead and vote for a criminal if you must.


Gowdy couldn't rip a sheet of toilet paper apart. All he did was once again
demo what a partisan asshole he is.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Are you bi-partisan Harry?



Of course not, but I'm not an elected representative in Congress
conducting a never-ending witch hunt, like Gowdy.

11:06 AMKeyser Söze
On 7/8/16 8:13 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 7:02:05 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
- show quoted text -
Of course not, but I'm not an elected representative in Congress
conducting a never-ending witch hunt, like Gowdy.
.....

"Never ending witch hunt?" What do you mean? We already know who and what she is. Lol!

On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 2:28:12 AM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

She might need your help. Look at "latest polls"

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/...vorable-rating

On 7/8/16 7:55 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 2:28:12 AM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

She might need your help. Look at "latest polls"

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/...vorable-rating


D'uh. That's not a preference poll.

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:03:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/8/16 7:55 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 2:28:12 AM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

She might need your help. Look at "latest polls"

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/...vorable-rating


D'uh. That's not a preference poll.

No it is a "chart that combines the latest opinion polls into
trendlines and is updated whenever a new poll is released".

It is clear that the consensus of favorable to unfavorable crossed in
February.
I bet Trump's charts are similar.

Put the dice back in the cup, Shake it again!

On 7/8/16 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:03:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/8/16 7:55 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 2:28:12 AM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

She might need your help. Look at "latest polls"

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/...vorable-rating


D'uh. That's not a preference poll.

No it is a "chart that combines the latest opinion polls into
trendlines and is updated whenever a new poll is released".

It is clear that the consensus of favorable to unfavorable crossed in
February.
I bet Trump's charts are similar.

Put the dice back in the cup, Shake it again!


I'm interested in the match-up polls. The "favorable-unfavorable" polls
are a different animal.

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:30:49 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/8/16 12:24 PM, wrote:

D'uh. That's not a preference poll.

No it is a "chart that combines the latest opinion polls into
trendlines and is updated whenever a new poll is released".

It is clear that the consensus of favorable to unfavorable crossed in
February.
I bet Trump's charts are similar.

Put the dice back in the cup, Shake it again!


I'm interested in the match-up polls. The "favorable-unfavorable" polls
are a different animal.


Anything that makes Hillary look good huh?

You really are binary. You only see 2 choices.

Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/8/16 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:03:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/8/16 7:55 AM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 2:28:12 AM UTC-5, Boating All Out wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!

She might need your help. Look at "latest polls"

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/...vorable-rating


D'uh. That's not a preference poll.

No it is a "chart that combines the latest opinion polls into
trendlines and is updated whenever a new poll is released".

It is clear that the consensus of favorable to unfavorable crossed in
February.
I bet Trump's charts are similar.

Put the dice back in the cup, Shake it again!


I'm interested in the match-up polls. The "favorable-unfavorable" polls
are a different animal.




Why?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/