|
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/
If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
I confess o haven't read the article but Haven't the Clintons always had corporate ties?
|
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 06:49:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: I confess o haven't read the article but Haven't the Clintons always had corporate ties? She was on the Board of Walmart ... when they stopped being "America's store" and became the China outlet mall. She also worked for the law firm that represented Tyson Foods and Walmart, among other companies in the south. If she was a republican, there may have been conflict of interest problem since she was representing companies doing business in Arkansas, while Bill was the governor. The rules seem to be different for democrats. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On 7/5/16 11:37 AM, justan wrote:
Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? Do you have specifics to offer aside from the drool running down your chin onto your bib? |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote:
Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? -- x "As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,” according to the newspaper. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains “big news” that will “shock people” and make voters “question” Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy. The volume “asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return,” the Times reports. “We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Schweizer writes." Hilly is a corporate and political whore. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
Keyser Sze Wrote in message:
On 7/5/16 11:37 AM, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? Do you have specifics to offer aside from the drool running down your chin onto your bib? Seemed specific enough to me. You know how talented at making evidence disappear those Clintoons are. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On 7/5/16 12:05 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? -- x "As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,” according to the newspaper. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains “big news” that will “shock people” and make voters “question” Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy. The volume “asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return,” the Times reports. “We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Schweizer writes." Hilly is a corporate and political whore. Rand Paul? The loonytarian is offering up an opinion? Hehehe. And you boys have Donald Trump. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On 7/5/16 12:08 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Sze Wrote in message: On 7/5/16 11:37 AM, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? Do you have specifics to offer aside from the drool running down your chin onto your bib? Seemed specific enough to me. You know how talented at making evidence disappear those Clintoons are. Seems specific to you because you are a moron and you support, puke, Trump. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
Its Me Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? -- x "As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, ?a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities ? is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,? according to the newspaper. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains ?big news? that will ?shock people? and make voters ?question? Mrs. Clinton?s candidacy. The volume ?asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton?s State Department in return,? the Times reports. ?We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,? Schweizer writes." Hilly is a corporate and political whore. My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there been a president for that possibility? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On 7/5/16 12:13 PM, justan wrote:
Its Me Wrote in message: On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? -- x "As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, ?a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities ? is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,? according to the newspaper. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains ?big news? that will ?shock people? and make voters ?question? Mrs. Clinton?s candidacy. The volume ?asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton?s State Department in return,? the Times reports. ?We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,? Schweizer writes." Hilly is a corporate and political whore. My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there been a president for that possibility? Your guess and $10 will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks. You have to pay extra because of your utter stupidity. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:35:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 11:32 AM, wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? D'uh. Obviously, the answer is to disqualify from seeking office anyone who has ever had any corporate ties or even contributions from corporations. You certainly should be questioning $750,000 honorariums for a man who's wife is the SoS and the corporation is doing international business that State is signing off on. The Saudis have funneled millions into super pacs that endorse here. It is "hold your nose" legal but certainly should raise red flags. If anyone but Trump was running against her, she would be deader than disco. Comey just came out today and said "Scty Clinton was "extremely careless in handling highly classified information", "Information was properly classified as 'top secret, special access only' at the time it discussed on E-mail". He pointed out that her server was not even as secure as G-mail. "It is possible that hostile actors gained evidence to her E-mail account" He went on to say they found a ****load of undisclosed "work related" E-mails that were not turned over and that they made an intentional effort to wipe as many devices clean as they could. Unlike commercial "private" E-mail servers, nothing was archived. If they deleted an Email and it was not still spinning in the slack space of the drive, it was gone forever. Conclusion "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes" He went on to say criminal prosecutions for these things is not likely BUT that there are generally "administrative sanctions". She may not be prosecuted at this time but the FBI calls her "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information" That doesn't sound very presidential to me. I think they should put all the dice back in the cup at BOTH conventions and find 2 new candidates, |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
Keyser Sze Wrote in message:
On 7/5/16 12:13 PM, justan wrote: Its Me Wrote in message: On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? -- x "As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, ?a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities ? is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,? according to the newspaper. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains ?big news? that will ?shock people? and make voters ?question? Mrs. Clinton?s candidacy. The volume ?asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton?s State Department in return,? the Times reports. ?We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,? Schweizer writes." Hilly is a corporate and political whore. My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there been a president for that possibility? Your guess and $10 will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks. You have to pay extra because of your utter stupidity. Did I say that? How utterly moronic of me. Yup -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:42:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? Do you have specifics to offer I imagine they will be saving that for the end of the summer. There is plenty of smoke, but we have not seen the fire yet. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On 7/5/16 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:35:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/5/16 11:32 AM, wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? D'uh. Obviously, the answer is to disqualify from seeking office anyone who has ever had any corporate ties or even contributions from corporations. You certainly should be questioning $750,000 honorariums for a man who's wife is the SoS and the corporation is doing international business that State is signing off on. The Saudis have funneled millions into super pacs that endorse here. It is "hold your nose" legal but certainly should raise red flags. If anyone but Trump was running against her, she would be deader than disco. Comey just came out today and said "Scty Clinton was "extremely careless in handling highly classified information", "Information was properly classified as 'top secret, special access only' at the time it discussed on E-mail". He pointed out that her server was not even as secure as G-mail. "It is possible that hostile actors gained evidence to her E-mail account" He went on to say they found a ****load of undisclosed "work related" E-mails that were not turned over and that they made an intentional effort to wipe as many devices clean as they could. Unlike commercial "private" E-mail servers, nothing was archived. If they deleted an Email and it was not still spinning in the slack space of the drive, it was gone forever. Conclusion "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes" He went on to say criminal prosecutions for these things is not likely BUT that there are generally "administrative sanctions". She may not be prosecuted at this time but the FBI calls her "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information" That doesn't sound very presidential to me. I think they should put all the dice back in the cup at BOTH conventions and find 2 new candidates, There will be no indictment, but you can still hope for one charging Hillary with planning and directing the multiple shooters on the grassy knoll back in Dallas in 1963. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 12:08:33 PM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 12:05 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? -- x "As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,” according to the newspaper. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains “big news” that will “shock people” and make voters “question” Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy. The volume “asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return,” the Times reports. “We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Schweizer writes." Hilly is a corporate and political whore. Rand Paul? The loonytarian is offering up an opinion? Hehehe. And you boys have Donald Trump. "As the *New York Times* reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,” according to the newspaper." Hehe is right. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
|
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On 7/5/16 12:26 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 12:08:33 PM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/5/16 12:05 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? -- x "As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,” according to the newspaper. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains “big news” that will “shock people” and make voters “question” Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy. The volume “asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return,” the Times reports. “We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Schweizer writes." Hilly is a corporate and political whore. Rand Paul? The loonytarian is offering up an opinion? Hehehe. And you boys have Donald Trump. "As the *New York Times* reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,” according to the newspaper." Hehe is right. The book is scheduled to be published May 5. That was May 5, more than a year ago. The book was criticized for being a screed full of bull****, and, in fact, after it was published, a half dozen or more passages in it were pulled because they were bull****. Have nice day, Trumpster. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:05:58 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote: "As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,” according to the newspaper. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains “big news” that will “shock people” and make voters “question” Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy. The volume “asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department in return,” the Times reports. “We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Schweizer writes." Hilly is a corporate and political whore. That is the second shoe to drop in the E-mail investigation. Expect to see FOIA requests for those E-mails the FBI recovered and people scouring them for messages about the CBI and foreign influence on State. I never thought the "classified" deal was where the meat would be. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:08:13 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:
Seemed specific enough to me. You know how talented at making evidence disappear those Clintoons are. -- x Considering how much the FBI did recover, perhaps they are not as smart as we assumed. It appears they just formatted the drives but they did not run a "wipe" program and the unused sectors were still loaded with latent data. They tried to hide their secrets but in the same "careless" manner that they were using in the protection of our nations secrets |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:13:51 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:
My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there been a president for that possibility? The democrats will come up with someone, no matter what happens. Biden is still hanging around waiting until they really need him. He may be their strongest candidate. Looking at this bunch, I might even look at him a little harder. He is head and shoulders above Trump and Clinton in integrity, honesty and qualifications, even if I disagree with most of his politics. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:26:29 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
You certainly should be questioning $750,000 honorariums for a man who's wife is the SoS and the corporation is doing international business that State is signing off on. The Saudis have funneled millions into super pacs that endorse here. It is "hold your nose" legal but certainly should raise red flags. If anyone but Trump was running against her, she would be deader than disco. Comey just came out today and said "Scty Clinton was "extremely careless in handling highly classified information", "Information was properly classified as 'top secret, special access only' at the time it discussed on E-mail". He pointed out that her server was not even as secure as G-mail. "It is possible that hostile actors gained evidence to her E-mail account" He went on to say they found a ****load of undisclosed "work related" E-mails that were not turned over and that they made an intentional effort to wipe as many devices clean as they could. Unlike commercial "private" E-mail servers, nothing was archived. If they deleted an Email and it was not still spinning in the slack space of the drive, it was gone forever. Conclusion "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes" He went on to say criminal prosecutions for these things is not likely BUT that there are generally "administrative sanctions". She may not be prosecuted at this time but the FBI calls her "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information" That doesn't sound very presidential to me. I think they should put all the dice back in the cup at BOTH conventions and find 2 new candidates, There will be no indictment, but you can still hope for one charging Hillary with planning and directing the multiple shooters on the grassy knoll back in Dallas in 1963. If you have been paying attention, you noticed I never thought much would come out of this "classified E-mail" thing. The report was worse than I expected tho. She did send top secret (at the time) information on an unsecured platform and it is likely that foreign operators may have intercepted her communication. Al that Comey would commit to is that she was "sloppy" and "careless", not exactly what you want to see on a bumper sticker. What may come out and what was not in the scope of this investigation is whether there were any inappropriate transfers of money or favors between CBI and foreign governments that State had influence over. All of those recovered E-mails are now government records and you can bet your ass the FOIA requests are already in the mail. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
|
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:27:24 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
I imagine they will be saving that for the end of the summer. There is plenty of smoke, but we have not seen the fire yet. Who? The Trumpsters? Will they be issuing it on letterhead from the White Knights of the Jew Haters of America? Brain fart If I had to guess, I would start with Drudge, Fox and the other usual suspects when people go after the Clintons. The "Clinton Cash" guy already has plenty of documents and once he gets his hand on the E-mails the FBI recovered the dots may connect a little easier. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
|
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:26:29 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: You certainly should be questioning $750,000 honorariums for a man who's wife is the SoS and the corporation is doing international business that State is signing off on. The Saudis have funneled millions into super pacs that endorse here. It is "hold your nose" legal but certainly should raise red flags. If anyone but Trump was running against her, she would be deader than disco. Comey just came out today and said "Scty Clinton was "extremely careless in handling highly classified information", "Information was properly classified as 'top secret, special access only' at the time it discussed on E-mail". He pointed out that her server was not even as secure as G-mail. "It is possible that hostile actors gained evidence to her E-mail account" He went on to say they found a ****load of undisclosed "work related" E-mails that were not turned over and that they made an intentional effort to wipe as many devices clean as they could. Unlike commercial "private" E-mail servers, nothing was archived. If they deleted an Email and it was not still spinning in the slack space of the drive, it was gone forever. Conclusion "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes" He went on to say criminal prosecutions for these things is not likely BUT that there are generally "administrative sanctions". She may not be prosecuted at this time but the FBI calls her "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information" That doesn't sound very presidential to me. I think they should put all the dice back in the cup at BOTH conventions and find 2 new candidates, There will be no indictment, but you can still hope for one charging Hillary with planning and directing the multiple shooters on the grassy knoll back in Dallas in 1963. If you have been paying attention, you noticed I never thought much would come out of this "classified E-mail" thing. The report was worse than I expected tho. She did send top secret (at the time) information on an unsecured platform and it is likely that foreign operators may have intercepted her communication. Al that Comey would commit to is that she was "sloppy" and "careless", not exactly what you want to see on a bumper sticker. What may come out and what was not in the scope of this investigation is whether there were any inappropriate transfers of money or favors between CBI and foreign governments that State had influence over. All of those recovered E-mails are now government records and you can bet your ass the FOIA requests are already in the mail. "Sloppy and careless for president. " It does attract a certain class of voter. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:40:00 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
No one considering voting Democratic gives a **** what Drudge posts or what Fox makes up. True Clintonistas still think Bill never pulled his dick out and told unwilling staffers to "kiss it" even though he copped a plea and gave up his law license. That is the respect for women the Dumbocrats seen to be able to ignore. I think there is no limit to your ignorance when it comes to pulling the rooster. You still think Hillary is not a wall street apparatchik |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
Keyser Sze Wrote in message:
On 7/5/16 12:26 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 12:08:33 PM UTC-4, Keyser Sze wrote: On 7/5/16 12:05 PM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing sinister there, right? -- x "As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, ?a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities ? is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,? according to the newspaper. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains ?big news? that will ?shock people? and make voters ?question? Mrs. Clinton?s candidacy. The volume ?asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton?s State Department in return,? the Times reports. ?We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,? Schweizer writes." Hilly is a corporate and political whore. Rand Paul? The loonytarian is offering up an opinion? Hehehe. And you boys have Donald Trump. "As the *New York Times* reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, ?a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities ? is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,? according to the newspaper." Hehe is right. The book is scheduled to be published May 5. That was May 5, more than a year ago. The book was criticized for being a screed full of bull****, and, in fact, after it was published, a half dozen or more passages in it were pulled because they were bull****. Have nice day, Trumpster. Here's your chance to denounce reports of your financially stupid and underhanded behavior. WHAT'S THAT, CRICKETS? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:13:51 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote: My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there been a president for that possibility? The democrats will come up with someone, no matter what happens. Biden is still hanging around waiting until they really need him. He may be their strongest candidate. Looking at this bunch, I might even look at him a little harder. He is head and shoulders above Trump and Clinton in integrity, honesty and qualifications, even if I disagree with most of his politics. For sure he wouldn't act like a spoiled child and invoke executive order when he didn't get his way. Replacing Hilly with Biden would certainly attract some republican vote. x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On 7/5/16 2:14 PM, justan wrote:
Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:13:51 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote: My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there been a president for that possibility? The democrats will come up with someone, no matter what happens. Biden is still hanging around waiting until they really need him. He may be their strongest candidate. Looking at this bunch, I might even look at him a little harder. He is head and shoulders above Trump and Clinton in integrity, honesty and qualifications, even if I disagree with most of his politics. For sure he wouldn't act like a spoiled child and invoke executive order when he didn't get his way. Replacing Hilly with Biden would certainly attract some republican vote. x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ Sorry, ****heads, you are stuck with Trump. You should put up a Trump yard sign to identify yourself as a xenophobic, misogynistic racist. But, hey, I'm sure your neighbors already know that about you, right? |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:20:35 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 2:14 PM, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:13:51 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote: My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there been a president for that possibility? The democrats will come up with someone, no matter what happens. Biden is still hanging around waiting until they really need him. He may be their strongest candidate. Looking at this bunch, I might even look at him a little harder. He is head and shoulders above Trump and Clinton in integrity, honesty and qualifications, even if I disagree with most of his politics. For sure he wouldn't act like a spoiled child and invoke executive order when he didn't get his way. Replacing Hilly with Biden would certainly attract some republican vote. x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ Sorry, ****heads, you are stuck with Trump. You should put up a Trump yard sign to identify yourself as a xenophobic, misogynistic racist. But, hey, I'm sure your neighbors already know that about you, right? Reading comprehension thing again? You are not responding to what was actually written. You just burped out a brain fart. The man said Biden "would certainly attract some republican vote" ... the ones who can't stand trump and could not possibly vote for hillary. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On 7/5/16 4:28 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:20:35 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/5/16 2:14 PM, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:13:51 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote: My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there been a president for that possibility? The democrats will come up with someone, no matter what happens. Biden is still hanging around waiting until they really need him. He may be their strongest candidate. Looking at this bunch, I might even look at him a little harder. He is head and shoulders above Trump and Clinton in integrity, honesty and qualifications, even if I disagree with most of his politics. For sure he wouldn't act like a spoiled child and invoke executive order when he didn't get his way. Replacing Hilly with Biden would certainly attract some republican vote. x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ Sorry, ****heads, you are stuck with Trump. You should put up a Trump yard sign to identify yourself as a xenophobic, misogynistic racist. But, hey, I'm sure your neighbors already know that about you, right? Reading comprehension thing again? You are not responding to what was actually written. You just burped out a brain fart. The man said Biden "would certainly attract some republican vote" ... the ones who can't stand trump and could not possibly vote for hillary. The Dems have their candidate, and she is going to slaughter Trump in the general, and she will get a significant number of votes from Republicans who are capable are thinking and care about their country. No need to insert Biden into the argument...he's not going anywhere near the presidency. What you think are "brain farts" typically is just me not taking seriously a post. FlaJim the moron says he thinks Trump will run unopposed. That's moronic nonsense. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:35:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
What you think are "brain farts" typically is just me not taking seriously a post. FlaJim the moron says he thinks Trump will run unopposed. That's moronic nonsense. You were responding to a comment that was 3 notes up with an intervening note in between from him. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
|
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On 7/5/2016 4:28 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:20:35 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/5/16 2:14 PM, justan wrote: Wrote in message: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:13:51 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote: My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there been a president for that possibility? The democrats will come up with someone, no matter what happens. Biden is still hanging around waiting until they really need him. He may be their strongest candidate. Looking at this bunch, I might even look at him a little harder. He is head and shoulders above Trump and Clinton in integrity, honesty and qualifications, even if I disagree with most of his politics. For sure he wouldn't act like a spoiled child and invoke executive order when he didn't get his way. Replacing Hilly with Biden would certainly attract some republican vote. x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ Sorry, ****heads, you are stuck with Trump. You should put up a Trump yard sign to identify yourself as a xenophobic, misogynistic racist. But, hey, I'm sure your neighbors already know that about you, right? Reading comprehension thing again? You are not responding to what was actually written. You just burped out a brain fart. The man said Biden "would certainly attract some republican vote" ... the ones who can't stand trump and could not possibly vote for hillary. I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:12:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Another thing that gets me .... the liberal media is playing up that the FBI "cleared" Hillary of any of wrongdoing. She wasn't "cleared". One can't be "cleared" if they are not charged. The decision was simply not to recommend charges to the AG. Comey said the normal result of this is "administrative sanctions" basically being fired and never getting a security clearance again. Good thing Hillary is not looking for a job where has to handle sensitive materials. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway. If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as if it really matters in your state. That was one thing Rollins and Beckel agreed about. They write off 40 states as not even being worth worrying about. They know how they will go, no matter what. |
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:26:32 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 12:20 PM, wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:35:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/5/16 11:32 AM, wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/ If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned. The Clintons have always been corporate whores. How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years? D'uh. Obviously, the answer is to disqualify from seeking office anyone who has ever had any corporate ties or even contributions from corporations. You certainly should be questioning $750,000 honorariums for a man who's wife is the SoS and the corporation is doing international business that State is signing off on. The Saudis have funneled millions into super pacs that endorse here. It is "hold your nose" legal but certainly should raise red flags. If anyone but Trump was running against her, she would be deader than disco. Comey just came out today and said "Scty Clinton was "extremely careless in handling highly classified information", "Information was properly classified as 'top secret, special access only' at the time it discussed on E-mail". He pointed out that her server was not even as secure as G-mail. "It is possible that hostile actors gained evidence to her E-mail account" He went on to say they found a ****load of undisclosed "work related" E-mails that were not turned over and that they made an intentional effort to wipe as many devices clean as they could. Unlike commercial "private" E-mail servers, nothing was archived. If they deleted an Email and it was not still spinning in the slack space of the drive, it was gone forever. Conclusion "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes" He went on to say criminal prosecutions for these things is not likely BUT that there are generally "administrative sanctions". She may not be prosecuted at this time but the FBI calls her "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information" That doesn't sound very presidential to me. I think they should put all the dice back in the cup at BOTH conventions and find 2 new candidates, There will be no indictment, but you can still hope for one charging Hillary with planning and directing the multiple shooters on the grassy knoll back in Dallas in 1963. Of course there was no indictment, Krause. However there was probably a load of damage slated in Trumps favour. http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...ebar_expansion |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com