Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:46:03 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.

You're being idiotic. A restaurant is *not* a "private organization".
D'oh.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 7:52 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:46:03 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.

You're being idiotic. A restaurant is *not* a "private organization".
D'oh.



Hehehe. You must have missed Rand Paul's comments about the ability to
discriminate, built upon Libertarianism.

Reminds me of a comment I read this morning...but I doubt you'll get it.

Someone said "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI
director said she was careless. Donald Trump is clueless."

You're a Trump voter, right?

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:03:48 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 7:52 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:46:03 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.

You're being idiotic. A restaurant is *not* a "private organization".
D'oh.



Hehehe. You must have missed Rand Paul's comments about the ability to
discriminate, built upon Libertarianism.

Reminds me of a comment I read this morning...but I doubt you'll get it.

Someone said "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI
director said she was careless. Donald Trump is clueless."

You're a Trump voter, right?

A liar like Hillary. Krause, your quote goes nowhere. From the Google search engine:

Your search - "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI director said she was careless ... - did not match any documents.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 8:19 AM, Tom Nofinger wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:03:48 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 7:52 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:46:03 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.

You're being idiotic. A restaurant is *not* a "private organization".
D'oh.



Hehehe. You must have missed Rand Paul's comments about the ability to
discriminate, built upon Libertarianism.

Reminds me of a comment I read this morning...but I doubt you'll get it.

Someone said "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI
director said she was careless. Donald Trump is clueless."

You're a Trump voter, right?

A liar like Hillary. Krause, your quote goes nowhere. From the Google search engine:

Your search - "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI director said she was careless ... - did not match any documents.



Is it possible you really are that clueless? Yes, of course, you're a
Trump voter.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 8:19:56 AM UTC-4, Tom Nofinger wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:03:48 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 7:52 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:46:03 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.

You're being idiotic. A restaurant is *not* a "private organization"..
D'oh.



Hehehe. You must have missed Rand Paul's comments about the ability to
discriminate, built upon Libertarianism.

Reminds me of a comment I read this morning...but I doubt you'll get it..

Someone said "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI
director said she was careless. Donald Trump is clueless."

You're a Trump voter, right?

A liar like Hillary. Krause, your quote goes nowhere. From the Google search engine:

Your search - "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI director said she was careless ... - did not match any documents.

And his "quote" above about "members of a private org..." doesn't match anything according to google either. Why is he making this BS up?

Bottom line is his made-up quote doesn't indicate that a public restaurant should be able to select their clientele. Libertarians do believe a private club should be able to, like a country club does, or like a local group of the black panthers. Or even like a moderated shooting or boating group does. Heh.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 9:15 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 8:19:56 AM UTC-4, Tom Nofinger wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:03:48 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 7:52 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:46:03 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.

You're being idiotic. A restaurant is *not* a "private organization".
D'oh.



Hehehe. You must have missed Rand Paul's comments about the ability to
discriminate, built upon Libertarianism.

Reminds me of a comment I read this morning...but I doubt you'll get it.

Someone said "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI
director said she was careless. Donald Trump is clueless."

You're a Trump voter, right?

A liar like Hillary. Krause, your quote goes nowhere. From the Google search engine:

Your search - "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI director said she was careless ... - did not match any documents.

And his "quote" above about "members of a private org..." doesn't match anything according to google either. Why is he making this BS up?

Bottom line is his made-up quote doesn't indicate that a public restaurant should be able to select their clientele. Libertarians do believe a private club should be able to, like a country club does, or like a local group of the black panthers. Or even like a moderated shooting or boating group does. Heh.



Thus, proof is once again provided that there are intellectual ciphers
among us who think that if they can't google it, it doesn't exist,
because google has everything. D'uh.

Here's a hint for you, JackOff...the "members of a private organization"
quotation is found in the "platform" of the Loonytarian Party. Perhaps
you can figure out how to google that.

Get back to us with your findings.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 9:30:25 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 9:15 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 8:19:56 AM UTC-4, Tom Nofinger wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:03:48 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 7:52 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:46:03 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.

You're being idiotic. A restaurant is *not* a "private organization".
D'oh.



Hehehe. You must have missed Rand Paul's comments about the ability to
discriminate, built upon Libertarianism.

Reminds me of a comment I read this morning...but I doubt you'll get it.

Someone said "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI
director said she was careless. Donald Trump is clueless."

You're a Trump voter, right?

A liar like Hillary. Krause, your quote goes nowhere. From the Google search engine:

Your search - "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI director said she was careless ... - did not match any documents.

And his "quote" above about "members of a private org..." doesn't match anything according to google either. Why is he making this BS up?

Bottom line is his made-up quote doesn't indicate that a public restaurant should be able to select their clientele. Libertarians do believe a private club should be able to, like a country club does, or like a local group of the black panthers. Or even like a moderated shooting or boating group does. Heh.



Thus, proof is once again provided that there are intellectual ciphers
among us who think that if they can't google it, it doesn't exist,
because google has everything. D'uh.

Here's a hint for you, JackOff...the "members of a private organization"
quotation is found in the "platform" of the Loonytarian Party. Perhaps
you can figure out how to google that.

Get back to us with your findings.

Read for content, asshole. While google didn't return any hits for that entire statement that you posted, it's your interpretation of its meaning that I'm calling BS on. You know, when you tried to stretch the meaning of "private organization" into "restaurant".

Besides, we all know your propensity to selectively edit cut-n-pastes to suit your agenda. The fellows in here have caught you at it several times in the past. That's just one reason most folks believe very little of what you post.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 10:12 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 9:30:25 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 9:15 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 8:19:56 AM UTC-4, Tom Nofinger wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:03:48 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 7:52 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:46:03 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.

You're being idiotic. A restaurant is *not* a "private organization".
D'oh.



Hehehe. You must have missed Rand Paul's comments about the ability to
discriminate, built upon Libertarianism.

Reminds me of a comment I read this morning...but I doubt you'll get it.

Someone said "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI
director said she was careless. Donald Trump is clueless."

You're a Trump voter, right?

A liar like Hillary. Krause, your quote goes nowhere. From the Google search engine:

Your search - "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI director said she was careless ... - did not match any documents.

And his "quote" above about "members of a private org..." doesn't match anything according to google either. Why is he making this BS up?

Bottom line is his made-up quote doesn't indicate that a public restaurant should be able to select their clientele. Libertarians do believe a private club should be able to, like a country club does, or like a local group of the black panthers. Or even like a moderated shooting or boating group does. Heh.



Thus, proof is once again provided that there are intellectual ciphers
among us who think that if they can't google it, it doesn't exist,
because google has everything. D'uh.

Here's a hint for you, JackOff...the "members of a private organization"
quotation is found in the "platform" of the Loonytarian Party. Perhaps
you can figure out how to google that.

Get back to us with your findings.

Read for content, asshole. While google didn't return any hits for that entire statement that you posted, it's your interpretation of its meaning that I'm calling BS on. You know, when you tried to stretch the meaning of "private organization" into "restaurant".

Besides, we all know your propensity to selectively edit cut-n-pastes to suit your agenda. The fellows in here have caught you at it several times in the past. That's just one reason most folks believe very little of what you post.



I didn't post an entire statement, just a fragment. And my
interpretation is no different than Libertarian Rand Paul, who
enunciated the Libertarian belief in the right to discriminate.

You're a yawner, JackOff.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 10:38:05 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 10:12 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 9:30:25 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 9:15 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 8:19:56 AM UTC-4, Tom Nofinger wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:03:48 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 7:52 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:46:03 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.

You're being idiotic. A restaurant is *not* a "private organization".
D'oh.



Hehehe. You must have missed Rand Paul's comments about the ability to
discriminate, built upon Libertarianism.

Reminds me of a comment I read this morning...but I doubt you'll get it.

Someone said "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI
director said she was careless. Donald Trump is clueless."

You're a Trump voter, right?

A liar like Hillary. Krause, your quote goes nowhere. From the Google search engine:

Your search - "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI director said she was careless ... - did not match any documents.

And his "quote" above about "members of a private org..." doesn't match anything according to google either. Why is he making this BS up?

Bottom line is his made-up quote doesn't indicate that a public restaurant should be able to select their clientele. Libertarians do believe a private club should be able to, like a country club does, or like a local group of the black panthers. Or even like a moderated shooting or boating group does. Heh.



Thus, proof is once again provided that there are intellectual ciphers
among us who think that if they can't google it, it doesn't exist,
because google has everything. D'uh.

Here's a hint for you, JackOff...the "members of a private organization"
quotation is found in the "platform" of the Loonytarian Party. Perhaps
you can figure out how to google that.

Get back to us with your findings.

Read for content, asshole. While google didn't return any hits for that entire statement that you posted, it's your interpretation of its meaning that I'm calling BS on. You know, when you tried to stretch the meaning of "private organization" into "restaurant".

Besides, we all know your propensity to selectively edit cut-n-pastes to suit your agenda. The fellows in here have caught you at it several times in the past. That's just one reason most folks believe very little of what you post.



I didn't post an entire statement, just a fragment. And my
interpretation is no different than Libertarian Rand Paul, who
enunciated the Libertarian belief in the right to discriminate.

You're a yawner, JackOff.

Your dementia is getting worse, harry. You keep dodging and changing the subject faster than loogy used to. Focus.

I googled the entire statement that YOU posted. I never said it was or wasn't the entire statement from it's source. D'oh.

The fact is, you changed the meaning of private org into restaurant, and then tried to say that all libertarians believe that. And you base that on one person's remarks about discrimination, which don't quite say what you think they do. D'oh number two.

You yawn because you're sleepy. Time for your pablum and a nap. Nighty-nite.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.




Restaurants are not private organizations. Yellow journalism?

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.


I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.


I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.



Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an
individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin,
gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be
inherited socially from parents).

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:21:22 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


Gee, you should have been booked on Morning Joe, where the gang of
Repubican Hillary Haters are all excoriating Mrs. Clinton and winking at
Trump's admiring comments yesterday about Saddam Hussein...

"He was a bad guy -- really bad guy. But you know what? He did well? He
killed terrorists. He did that so good. They didn't read them the
rights. They didn't talk. They were terrorists. Over. Today, Iraq is
Harvard for terrorism," Trump said.

So now you are saying GWB was right, taking down Saddam?

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:30:22 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
Here's a hint for you, ...the "members of a private organization"
quotation is found in the "platform" of the Loonytarian Party. Perhaps
you can figure out how to google that.

Get back to us with your findings.

What part of "private" are you having a problem with?
It is not a public accommodation.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 11:22 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:21:22 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


Gee, you should have been booked on Morning Joe, where the gang of
Repubican Hillary Haters are all excoriating Mrs. Clinton and winking at
Trump's admiring comments yesterday about Saddam Hussein...

"He was a bad guy -- really bad guy. But you know what? He did well? He
killed terrorists. He did that so good. They didn't read them the
rights. They didn't talk. They were terrorists. Over. Today, Iraq is
Harvard for terrorism," Trump said.

So now you are saying GWB was right, taking down Saddam?



No, I am commenting on Trump's inability to control his tongue in regard
to his admiration of Saddam's techniques. You really ought to stop
projecting your conclusions about the meaning of the words of others.

"He did well."

Yup.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:30:22 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
Here's a hint for you, ...the "members of a private organization"
quotation is found in the "platform" of the Loonytarian Party. Perhaps
you can figure out how to google that.

Get back to us with your findings.

What part of "private" are you having a problem with?
It is not a public accommodation.



I recall Randy Paul talking about why he believed restaurant owners and
others in that sort of biz should be able to discriminate as they wish.

In case you forgot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92M3mSKbwR4

The Pauls, father and son, are the most prominent loonytarians. And Ron
Paul had his name attached to some brochures that were blatantly
anti-Semitic.

Have nice day.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:15:47 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.


I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.



Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an
individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin,
gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be
inherited socially from parents).

Many people who deviate have control over their "gender preference". Remove the word preference, and you would be correct.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 11:38 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:15:47 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.


I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.



Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an
individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin,
gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be
inherited socially from parents).

Many people who deviate have control over their "gender preference". Remove the word preference, and you would be correct.



Oh? Define "many" in terms of a percentage. Please. And from your
personal knowledge and study. No cites, please, from right-wingers,
fundamentalist preachers, et cetera, or groups that promote the
right-wing agenda.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:15:45 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote:

I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.



Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an
individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin,
gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be
inherited socially from parents).

Political speech is constitutionally protected, public accommodation
is not.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 11:45 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:15:45 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote:

I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.



Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an
individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin,
gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be
inherited socially from parents).

Political speech is constitutionally protected, public accommodation
is not.


Public accommodation is protected by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the
law that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or
national origin. It ended unequal application of voter registration
requirements and racial segregation in schools, at the workplace and by
facilities that served the general public (known as "public
accommodations").

It's the law that offends Libertarians because it interferes with their
right to discriminate.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:26:49 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/6/16 11:22 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:21:22 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


Gee, you should have been booked on Morning Joe, where the gang of
Repubican Hillary Haters are all excoriating Mrs. Clinton and winking at
Trump's admiring comments yesterday about Saddam Hussein...

"He was a bad guy -- really bad guy. But you know what? He did well? He
killed terrorists. He did that so good. They didn't read them the
rights. They didn't talk. They were terrorists. Over. Today, Iraq is
Harvard for terrorism," Trump said.

So now you are saying GWB was right, taking down Saddam?



No, I am commenting on Trump's inability to control his tongue in regard
to his admiration of Saddam's techniques. You really ought to stop
projecting your conclusions about the meaning of the words of others.

"He did well."

Yup.

If you are talking about keeping the crazies in Iraq tamped down, he
did do well. I could say the same for the Soviets, Qdaffy and Mubarak.
In fact, we backed the overthrow of Morsi the democratically elected
leader and installed another military dictator in Egypt (Sisi). I
imagine that was just to calm down the people in our 51st state tho.
The Muslim brotherhood scared the **** out of them.
It seems we are always wringing our hands about a dictator, until we
see what comes after. Then we wonder what we were thinking.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:31:05 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I recall Randy Paul talking about why he believed restaurant owners and
others in that sort of biz should be able to discriminate as they wish.

In case you forgot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92M3mSKbwR4

The Pauls, father and son, are the most prominent loonytarians. And Ron
Paul had his name attached to some brochures that were blatantly
anti-Semitic.

Have nice day.

I understand Ron Paul does not support the West Bank settlements and
other Israeli apartheid activities but I am not sure I have heard him
say bad things about Jews in general.

You do not have to go very far back to find plenty of prominent
democrats who were anti semites. Certainly within my lifetime.
Truman was notoriously anti semitic, racist and an all around asshole.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:31:05 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I recall Randy Paul talking about why he believed restaurant owners and
others in that sort of biz should be able to discriminate as they wish.

In case you forgot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92M3mSKbwR4

The Pauls, father and son, are the most prominent loonytarians. And Ron
Paul had his name attached to some brochures that were blatantly
anti-Semitic.

Have nice day.

I understand Ron Paul does not support the West Bank settlements and
other Israeli apartheid activities but I am not sure I have heard him
say bad things about Jews in general.

You do not have to go very far back to find plenty of prominent
democrats who were anti semites. Certainly within my lifetime.
Truman was notoriously anti semitic, racist and an all around asshole.


You think virtually all politicians are assholes because you despise
government.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:54:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/6/16 11:45 AM, wrote:

Political speech is constitutionally protected, public accommodation
is not.


Public accommodation is protected by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the
law that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or
national origin. It ended unequal application of voter registration
requirements and racial segregation in schools, at the workplace and by
facilities that served the general public (known as "public
accommodations").

You seemed to miss the "Constitutional" part.

It's the law that offends Libertarians because it interferes with their
right to discriminate.


If it is a PRIVATE operation, why shouldn't you have the right to
decide who can join? I personally find discrimination against people
based on race religion or gender to be stupid but I am not sure it
should be the law.
I do find it interesting that you talk about the evils of
discrimination but you are the first one to discriminate against
christians.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:13:54 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:31:05 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I recall Randy Paul talking about why he believed restaurant owners and
others in that sort of biz should be able to discriminate as they wish.

In case you forgot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92M3mSKbwR4

The Pauls, father and son, are the most prominent loonytarians. And Ron
Paul had his name attached to some brochures that were blatantly
anti-Semitic.

Have nice day.

I understand Ron Paul does not support the West Bank settlements and
other Israeli apartheid activities but I am not sure I have heard him
say bad things about Jews in general.

You do not have to go very far back to find plenty of prominent
democrats who were anti semites. Certainly within my lifetime.
Truman was notoriously anti semitic, racist and an all around asshole.


You think virtually all politicians are assholes because you despise
government.

If it wasn't for the politicians, I might not have such a problem with
government. They are simply whores who sell their influence to the
highest bidder. When that influence translates into the laws that
control us all, you are right. I despise government.
If you are really upset that the 1% has so much power, you should too.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 12:07 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:31:05 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I recall Randy Paul talking about why he believed restaurant owners and
others in that sort of biz should be able to discriminate as they wish.

In case you forgot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92M3mSKbwR4

The Pauls, father and son, are the most prominent loonytarians. And Ron
Paul had his name attached to some brochures that were blatantly
anti-Semitic.

Have nice day.

I understand Ron Paul does not support the West Bank settlements and
other Israeli apartheid activities but I am not sure I have heard him
say bad things about Jews in general.

You do not have to go very far back to find plenty of prominent
democrats who were anti semites. Certainly within my lifetime.
Truman was notoriously anti semitic, racist and an all around asshole.



The State of Israel would not have existed with its recognition by the
Truman Administration.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 12:31 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:54:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/6/16 11:45 AM, wrote:

Political speech is constitutionally protected, public accommodation
is not.


Public accommodation is protected by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the
law that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or
national origin. It ended unequal application of voter registration
requirements and racial segregation in schools, at the workplace and by
facilities that served the general public (known as "public
accommodations").

You seemed to miss the "Constitutional" part.

It's the law that offends Libertarians because it interferes with their
right to discriminate.


If it is a PRIVATE operation, why shouldn't you have the right to
decide who can join? I personally find discrimination against people
based on race religion or gender to be stupid but I am not sure it
should be the law.
I do find it interesting that you talk about the evils of
discrimination but you are the first one to discriminate against
christians.


Oh? How do *I* discriminate against christians? Please be specific.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 12:07 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:31:05 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I recall Randy Paul talking about why he believed restaurant owners and
others in that sort of biz should be able to discriminate as they wish.

In case you forgot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92M3mSKbwR4

The Pauls, father and son, are the most prominent loonytarians. And Ron
Paul had his name attached to some brochures that were blatantly
anti-Semitic.

Have nice day.

I understand Ron Paul does not support the West Bank settlements and
other Israeli apartheid activities but I am not sure I have heard him
say bad things about Jews in general.

You do not have to go very far back to find plenty of prominent
democrats who were anti semites. Certainly within my lifetime.
Truman was notoriously anti semitic, racist and an all around asshole.



The State of Israel would not have existed with its recognition by the
Truman Administration.


By the time Truman / US government recognized Israel, was defacto
recognized by Europe. I have hint it was just a recognition of what was in
place.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:48:48 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/6/16 12:07 PM, wrote:


You do not have to go very far back to find plenty of prominent
democrats who were anti semites. Certainly within my lifetime.
Truman was notoriously anti semitic, racist and an all around asshole.



The State of Israel would not have existed with its recognition by the
Truman Administration.

Truman was against the idea personally but he was in a close election
and famously said "I do not have hundreds of thousands of Arabs among
my constituents."

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:45:48 -0500, Califbill
wrote:


By the time Truman / US government recognized Israel, was defacto
recognized by Europe. I have hint it was just a recognition of what was in
place.

The anti semites in Europe saw it as doing what they wanted to do when
the nazis were coming into power, get rid of the jews.
Nobody in Europe believed the arabs had any rights at all. They had
been colonizing Africa for centuries and this was just another colony
in their mind. The only ones who objected were the Brits because
Palestine was their colony. They were losing their other colonies and
this one was not really that important economically so they let it go.

I still think the right thing would have been to take land from the
Germans and let the jews set up their state there. Unfortunately, the
war may not have actually ended if we did that. In that regard, we may
have defeated Hitler but we did not defeat his core policy. None of
the nazis had to give back the stuff they stole from the jews. That
was true of the Swiss too. The restitution that should have paid by
the Germans fell on the Palestinians.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:42:38 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:38 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:15:47 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.


I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.



Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an
individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin,
gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be
inherited socially from parents).

Many people who deviate have control over their "gender preference". Remove the word preference, and you would be correct.



Oh? Define "many" in terms of a percentage. Please. And from your
personal knowledge and study. No cites, please, from right-wingers,
fundamentalist preachers, et cetera, or groups that promote the
right-wing agenda.

Loogy! It *is* you!
Sorry, but you're not in charge here, and I have no reason to educate you.
But if you want some education, look up the word "preference". Please. :)

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 1:45 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 12:07 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:31:05 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I recall Randy Paul talking about why he believed restaurant owners and
others in that sort of biz should be able to discriminate as they wish.

In case you forgot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92M3mSKbwR4

The Pauls, father and son, are the most prominent loonytarians. And Ron
Paul had his name attached to some brochures that were blatantly
anti-Semitic.

Have nice day.

I understand Ron Paul does not support the West Bank settlements and
other Israeli apartheid activities but I am not sure I have heard him
say bad things about Jews in general.

You do not have to go very far back to find plenty of prominent
democrats who were anti semites. Certainly within my lifetime.
Truman was notoriously anti semitic, racist and an all around asshole.



The State of Israel would not have existed with its recognition by the
Truman Administration.


By the time Truman / US government recognized Israel, was defacto
recognized by Europe. I have hint it was just a recognition of what was in
place.



Really? On May 14, 1948, the Provisional Government of Israel proclaimed
its new state of Israel. That same date the United States recognized the
provisional Jewish government as de facto authority of the Jewish state.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 2:55 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:42:38 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:38 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:15:47 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.


I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.



Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an
individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin,
gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be
inherited socially from parents).

Many people who deviate have control over their "gender preference". Remove the word preference, and you would be correct.



Oh? Define "many" in terms of a percentage. Please. And from your
personal knowledge and study. No cites, please, from right-wingers,
fundamentalist preachers, et cetera, or groups that promote the
right-wing agenda.

Loogy! It *is* you!
Sorry, but you're not in charge here, and I have no reason to educate you.
But if you want some education, look up the word "preference". Please. :)


I had a feeling you were blowing that out your ass.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 06:15:12 -0700 (PDT), Its Me wrote:

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 8:19:56 AM UTC-4, Tom Nofinger wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:03:48 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 7:52 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:46:03 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.

You're being idiotic. A restaurant is *not* a "private organization".
D'oh.



Hehehe. You must have missed Rand Paul's comments about the ability to
discriminate, built upon Libertarianism.

Reminds me of a comment I read this morning...but I doubt you'll get it.

Someone said "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI
director said she was careless. Donald Trump is clueless."

You're a Trump voter, right?

A liar like Hillary. Krause, your quote goes nowhere. From the Google search engine:

Your search - "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI director said she was careless ... - did not match any documents.

And his "quote" above about "members of a private org..." doesn't match anything according to google either. Why is he making this BS up?

Bottom line is his made-up quote doesn't indicate that a public restaurant should be able to select their clientele. Libertarians do believe a private club should be able to, like a country club does, or like a local group of the black panthers. Or even like a moderated shooting or boating group does. Heh.

You mean Harry may have lied? Oh my gosh, that's hard to believe.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:15:45 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.


I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.



Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an
individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin,
gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be
inherited socially from parents).

You should thank Got that liars are not usually targetted. You'd go hungry a lot.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 15:15:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/6/16 2:34 PM, wrote:

Au contraire. I don't want to keep christians or any other group of
believers of superstition out of the town square. I simply don't think
the public's property is the appropriate place for permanently erected
religious symbolism of anyone's faith. If a town has an "all faiths day"
and individual congregants of superstition want to set up temporary
booths and hand out literature, that's fine with me, so long as they
take their booths and literature with them when the day is over, and
don't use the space to proselytize.

So you have changed you mind about christmas displays?

I do agree that this right should be open to and encourage everyone to
display the symbols of their faith. (even the wiccans if they want to
be there)
I have said a number of times, I am a spiritual guy but I have no
brand loyalty and I am not really bound by anyone's dogma. I do think
there are important life lessons in most religions.


I'm not sure what you mean by "insulting names."

I will point it out to you the next time you do it.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 4:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 15:15:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/6/16 2:34 PM, wrote:

Au contraire. I don't want to keep christians or any other group of
believers of superstition out of the town square. I simply don't think
the public's property is the appropriate place for permanently erected
religious symbolism of anyone's faith. If a town has an "all faiths day"
and individual congregants of superstition want to set up temporary
booths and hand out literature, that's fine with me, so long as they
take their booths and literature with them when the day is over, and
don't use the space to proselytize.

So you have changed you mind about christmas displays?

I do agree that this right should be open to and encourage everyone to
display the symbols of their faith. (even the wiccans if they want to
be there)
I have said a number of times, I am a spiritual guy but I have no
brand loyalty and I am not really bound by anyone's dogma. I do think
there are important life lessons in most religions.


I'm not sure what you mean by "insulting names."

I will point it out to you the next time you do it.


I'm not a fan of Xmas trees on public property, but nowadays I see them
more as a holiday symbol than a religious symbol.

I can hardly spend a minute with the evangelicals who say horrific
things about gays, abortion, whatever. I cannot imagine spending "an
eternity" with people like that. :)

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 1:45 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 12:07 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:31:05 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I recall Randy Paul talking about why he believed restaurant owners and
others in that sort of biz should be able to discriminate as they wish.

In case you forgot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92M3mSKbwR4

The Pauls, father and son, are the most prominent loonytarians. And Ron
Paul had his name attached to some brochures that were blatantly
anti-Semitic.

Have nice day.

I understand Ron Paul does not support the West Bank settlements and
other Israeli apartheid activities but I am not sure I have heard him
say bad things about Jews in general.

You do not have to go very far back to find plenty of prominent
democrats who were anti semites. Certainly within my lifetime.
Truman was notoriously anti semitic, racist and an all around asshole.



The State of Israel would not have existed with its recognition by the
Truman Administration.


By the time Truman / US government recognized Israel, was defacto
recognized by Europe. I have hint it was just a recognition of what was in
place.



Really? On May 14, 1948, the Provisional Government of Israel proclaimed
its new state of Israel. That same date the United States recognized the
provisional Jewish government as de facto authority of the Jewish state.


Europe was recognizing it, so what the hell, did not cost Truman anything.

Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
 

On 7/6/16 5:48 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 1:45 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 12:07 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:31:05 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I recall Randy Paul talking about why he believed restaurant owners and
others in that sort of biz should be able to discriminate as they wish.

In case you forgot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92M3mSKbwR4

The Pauls, father and son, are the most prominent loonytarians. And Ron
Paul had his name attached to some brochures that were blatantly
anti-Semitic.

Have nice day.

I understand Ron Paul does not support the West Bank settlements and
other Israeli apartheid activities but I am not sure I have heard him
say bad things about Jews in general.

You do not have to go very far back to find plenty of prominent
democrats who were anti semites. Certainly within my lifetime.
Truman was notoriously anti semitic, racist and an all around asshole.



The State of Israel would not have existed with its recognition by the
Truman Administration.


By the time Truman / US government recognized Israel, was defacto
recognized by Europe. I have hint it was just a recognition of what was in
place.



Really? On May 14, 1948, the Provisional Government of Israel proclaimed
its new state of Israel. That same date the United States recognized the
provisional Jewish government as de facto authority of the Jewish state.


Europe was recognizing it, so what the hell, did not cost Truman anything.


Truman pushed for the establishment of what became Israel beginning at
least in 1945, helped make the partition happen the way it did, and in
his early recognition of Israel, helped it become a modern, independent
state.