Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On 7/5/16 11:37 AM, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?



Do you have specifics to offer aside from the drool running down your
chin onto your bib?

Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/5/16 11:37 AM, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?



Do you have specifics to offer aside from the drool running down your
chin onto your bib?


Seemed specific enough to me. You know how talented at making evidence
disappear those Clintoons are.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On 7/5/16 12:08 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/5/16 11:37 AM, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?



Do you have specifics to offer aside from the drool running down your
chin onto your bib?


Seemed specific enough to me. You know how talented at making evidence
disappear those Clintoons are.


Seems specific to you because you are a moron and you support, puke, Trump.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:08:13 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Seemed specific enough to me. You know how talented at making evidence
disappear those Clintoons are.
--
x

Considering how much the FBI did recover, perhaps they are not as
smart as we assumed. It appears they just formatted the drives but
they did not run a "wipe" program and the unused sectors were still
loaded with latent data.
They tried to hide their secrets but in the same "careless" manner
that they were using in the protection of our nations secrets

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:42:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?



Do you have specifics to offer

I imagine they will be saving that for the end of the summer. There is
plenty of smoke, but we have not seen the fire yet.

On 7/5/16 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:42:42 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?



Do you have specifics to offer

I imagine they will be saving that for the end of the summer. There is
plenty of smoke, but we have not seen the fire yet.


Who? The Trumpsters? Will they be issuing it on letterhead from the
White Knights of the Jew Haters of America?

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:27:24 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I imagine they will be saving that for the end of the summer. There is
plenty of smoke, but we have not seen the fire yet.


Who? The Trumpsters? Will they be issuing it on letterhead from the
White Knights of the Jew Haters of America?

Brain fart

If I had to guess, I would start with Drudge, Fox and the other usual
suspects when people go after the Clintons. The "Clinton Cash" guy
already has plenty of documents and once he gets his hand on the
E-mails the FBI recovered the dots may connect a little easier.

On 7/5/16 1:37 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:27:24 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I imagine they will be saving that for the end of the summer. There is
plenty of smoke, but we have not seen the fire yet.


Who? The Trumpsters? Will they be issuing it on letterhead from the
White Knights of the Jew Haters of America?

Brain fart

If I had to guess, I would start with Drudge, Fox and the other usual
suspects when people go after the Clintons. The "Clinton Cash" guy
already has plenty of documents and once he gets his hand on the
E-mails the FBI recovered the dots may connect a little easier.



The Clinton Cash guy had to "revise" a number of sections of his screed
because they were...bull****.

No one considering voting Democratic gives a **** what Drudge posts or
what Fox makes up.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:40:00 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

No one considering voting Democratic gives a **** what Drudge posts or
what Fox makes up.

True Clintonistas still think Bill never pulled his dick out and told
unwilling staffers to "kiss it" even though he copped a plea and gave
up his law license. That is the respect for women the Dumbocrats seen
to be able to ignore. I think there is no limit to your ignorance when
it comes to pulling the rooster. You still think Hillary is not a wall
street apparatchik