On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:05:58 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:

"As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, “a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by
foreign entities — is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,� according to the newspaper.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains “big news� that will “shock people� and make voters “question� Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy. The volume “asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs.
Clinton’s State Department in return,� the Times reports.

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,� Schweizer writes."

Hilly is a corporate and political whore.

That is the second shoe to drop in the E-mail investigation. Expect to
see FOIA requests for those E-mails the FBI recovered and people
scouring them for messages about the CBI and foreign influence on
State. I never thought the "classified" deal was where the meat would
be.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:08:13 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Seemed specific enough to me. You know how talented at making evidence
disappear those Clintoons are.
--
x

Considering how much the FBI did recover, perhaps they are not as
smart as we assumed. It appears they just formatted the drives but
they did not run a "wipe" program and the unused sectors were still
loaded with latent data.
They tried to hide their secrets but in the same "careless" manner
that they were using in the protection of our nations secrets

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:13:51 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:



My guess is that Trump will end up running unopposed. Has there
been a president for that possibility?

The democrats will come up with someone, no matter what happens. Biden
is still hanging around waiting until they really need him. He may be
their strongest candidate. Looking at this bunch, I might even look at
him a little harder. He is head and shoulders above Trump and Clinton
in integrity, honesty and qualifications, even if I disagree with most
of his politics.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:26:29 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

You certainly should be questioning $750,000 honorariums for a man
who's wife is the SoS and the corporation is doing international
business that State is signing off on. The Saudis have funneled
millions into super pacs that endorse here. It is "hold your nose"
legal but certainly should raise red flags.
If anyone but Trump was running against her, she would be deader than
disco.
Comey just came out today and said "Scty Clinton was "extremely
careless in handling highly classified information", "Information was
properly classified as 'top secret, special access only' at the time
it discussed on E-mail". He pointed out that her server was not even
as secure as G-mail.
"It is possible that hostile actors gained evidence to her E-mail
account"
He went on to say they found a ****load of undisclosed "work related"
E-mails that were not turned over and that they made an intentional
effort to wipe as many devices clean as they could. Unlike commercial
"private" E-mail servers, nothing was archived. If they deleted an
Email and it was not still spinning in the slack space of the drive,
it was gone forever.
Conclusion "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes"
He went on to say criminal prosecutions for these things is not likely
BUT that there are generally "administrative sanctions".
She may not be prosecuted at this time but the FBI calls her
"extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly
classified information"

That doesn't sound very presidential to me.

I think they should put all the dice back in the cup at BOTH
conventions and find 2 new candidates,


There will be no indictment, but you can still hope for one charging
Hillary with planning and directing the multiple shooters on the grassy
knoll back in Dallas in 1963.

If you have been paying attention, you noticed I never thought much
would come out of this "classified E-mail" thing. The report was worse
than I expected tho. She did send top secret (at the time) information
on an unsecured platform and it is likely that foreign operators may
have intercepted her communication.
Al that Comey would commit to is that she was "sloppy" and "careless",
not exactly what you want to see on a bumper sticker.
What may come out and what was not in the scope of this investigation
is whether there were any inappropriate transfers of money or favors
between CBI and foreign governments that State had influence over.
All of those recovered E-mails are now government records and you can
bet your ass the FOIA requests are already in the mail.

On 7/5/16 1:33 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:26:29 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

You certainly should be questioning $750,000 honorariums for a man
who's wife is the SoS and the corporation is doing international
business that State is signing off on. The Saudis have funneled
millions into super pacs that endorse here. It is "hold your nose"
legal but certainly should raise red flags.
If anyone but Trump was running against her, she would be deader than
disco.
Comey just came out today and said "Scty Clinton was "extremely
careless in handling highly classified information", "Information was
properly classified as 'top secret, special access only' at the time
it discussed on E-mail". He pointed out that her server was not even
as secure as G-mail.
"It is possible that hostile actors gained evidence to her E-mail
account"
He went on to say they found a ****load of undisclosed "work related"
E-mails that were not turned over and that they made an intentional
effort to wipe as many devices clean as they could. Unlike commercial
"private" E-mail servers, nothing was archived. If they deleted an
Email and it was not still spinning in the slack space of the drive,
it was gone forever.
Conclusion "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes"
He went on to say criminal prosecutions for these things is not likely
BUT that there are generally "administrative sanctions".
She may not be prosecuted at this time but the FBI calls her
"extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly
classified information"

That doesn't sound very presidential to me.

I think they should put all the dice back in the cup at BOTH
conventions and find 2 new candidates,


There will be no indictment, but you can still hope for one charging
Hillary with planning and directing the multiple shooters on the grassy
knoll back in Dallas in 1963.

If you have been paying attention, you noticed I never thought much
would come out of this "classified E-mail" thing. The report was worse
than I expected tho. She did send top secret (at the time) information
on an unsecured platform and it is likely that foreign operators may
have intercepted her communication.
Al that Comey would commit to is that she was "sloppy" and "careless",
not exactly what you want to see on a bumper sticker.
What may come out and what was not in the scope of this investigation
is whether there were any inappropriate transfers of money or favors
between CBI and foreign governments that State had influence over.
All of those recovered E-mails are now government records and you can
bet your ass the FOIA requests are already in the mail.


Yawn. If they are released, then guess what, they ain't secret.

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:27:24 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I imagine they will be saving that for the end of the summer. There is
plenty of smoke, but we have not seen the fire yet.


Who? The Trumpsters? Will they be issuing it on letterhead from the
White Knights of the Jew Haters of America?

Brain fart

If I had to guess, I would start with Drudge, Fox and the other usual
suspects when people go after the Clintons. The "Clinton Cash" guy
already has plenty of documents and once he gets his hand on the
E-mails the FBI recovered the dots may connect a little easier.

On 7/5/16 1:37 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:27:24 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I imagine they will be saving that for the end of the summer. There is
plenty of smoke, but we have not seen the fire yet.


Who? The Trumpsters? Will they be issuing it on letterhead from the
White Knights of the Jew Haters of America?

Brain fart

If I had to guess, I would start with Drudge, Fox and the other usual
suspects when people go after the Clintons. The "Clinton Cash" guy
already has plenty of documents and once he gets his hand on the
E-mails the FBI recovered the dots may connect a little easier.



The Clinton Cash guy had to "revise" a number of sections of his screed
because they were...bull****.

No one considering voting Democratic gives a **** what Drudge posts or
what Fox makes up.

Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 12:26:29 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

You certainly should be questioning $750,000 honorariums for a man
who's wife is the SoS and the corporation is doing international
business that State is signing off on. The Saudis have funneled
millions into super pacs that endorse here. It is "hold your nose"
legal but certainly should raise red flags.
If anyone but Trump was running against her, she would be deader than
disco.
Comey just came out today and said "Scty Clinton was "extremely
careless in handling highly classified information", "Information was
properly classified as 'top secret, special access only' at the time
it discussed on E-mail". He pointed out that her server was not even
as secure as G-mail.
"It is possible that hostile actors gained evidence to her E-mail
account"
He went on to say they found a ****load of undisclosed "work related"
E-mails that were not turned over and that they made an intentional
effort to wipe as many devices clean as they could. Unlike commercial
"private" E-mail servers, nothing was archived. If they deleted an
Email and it was not still spinning in the slack space of the drive,
it was gone forever.
Conclusion "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes"
He went on to say criminal prosecutions for these things is not likely
BUT that there are generally "administrative sanctions".
She may not be prosecuted at this time but the FBI calls her
"extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly
classified information"

That doesn't sound very presidential to me.

I think they should put all the dice back in the cup at BOTH
conventions and find 2 new candidates,


There will be no indictment, but you can still hope for one charging
Hillary with planning and directing the multiple shooters on the grassy
knoll back in Dallas in 1963.

If you have been paying attention, you noticed I never thought much
would come out of this "classified E-mail" thing. The report was worse
than I expected tho. She did send top secret (at the time) information
on an unsecured platform and it is likely that foreign operators may
have intercepted her communication.
Al that Comey would commit to is that she was "sloppy" and "careless",
not exactly what you want to see on a bumper sticker.
What may come out and what was not in the scope of this investigation
is whether there were any inappropriate transfers of money or favors
between CBI and foreign governments that State had influence over.
All of those recovered E-mails are now government records and you can
bet your ass the FOIA requests are already in the mail.


"Sloppy and careless for president. "
It does attract a certain class of voter.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:40:00 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

No one considering voting Democratic gives a **** what Drudge posts or
what Fox makes up.

True Clintonistas still think Bill never pulled his dick out and told
unwilling staffers to "kiss it" even though he copped a plea and gave
up his law license. That is the respect for women the Dumbocrats seen
to be able to ignore. I think there is no limit to your ignorance when
it comes to pulling the rooster. You still think Hillary is not a wall
street apparatchik

Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/5/16 12:26 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 12:08:33 PM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 12:05 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:37:59 AM UTC-4, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


Speaking engagements and of course the Clinton Foundation. Nothing
sinister there, right?
--
x

"As the New York Times reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, ?a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities ? is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,? according to the newspaper.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), now a declared presidential candidate, said the book contains ?big news? that will ?shock people? and make voters ?question? Mrs. Clinton?s candidacy. The volume ?asserts that foreign entities who made payments to the Clinton Foundation and to Mr. Clinton through high speaking fees received favors from Mrs. Clinton?s State Department in return,? the Times reports.

?We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,? Schweizer writes."

Hilly is a corporate and political whore.



Rand Paul? The loonytarian is offering up an opinion? Hehehe. And you
boys have Donald Trump.

"As the *New York Times* reported last month, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer is scheduled to be published May 5. The book, ?a 186-page investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities ? is proving the most anticipated and feared book of a presidential cycle still in its infancy,? according to the newspaper."

Hehe is right.



The book is scheduled to be published May 5. That was May 5, more than a
year ago. The book was criticized for being a screed full of bull****,
and, in fact, after it was published, a half dozen or more passages in
it were pulled because they were bull****.

Have nice day, Trumpster.


Here's your chance to denounce reports of your financially stupid
and underhanded behavior.
WHAT'S THAT, CRICKETS?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/