Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.




Restaurants are not private organizations. Yellow journalism?

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.


I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.

On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.


I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.



Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an
individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin,
gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be
inherited socially from parents).

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:21:22 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


Gee, you should have been booked on Morning Joe, where the gang of
Repubican Hillary Haters are all excoriating Mrs. Clinton and winking at
Trump's admiring comments yesterday about Saddam Hussein...

"He was a bad guy -- really bad guy. But you know what? He did well? He
killed terrorists. He did that so good. They didn't read them the
rights. They didn't talk. They were terrorists. Over. Today, Iraq is
Harvard for terrorism," Trump said.

So now you are saying GWB was right, taking down Saddam?

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:30:22 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
Here's a hint for you, ...the "members of a private organization"
quotation is found in the "platform" of the Loonytarian Party. Perhaps
you can figure out how to google that.

Get back to us with your findings.

What part of "private" are you having a problem with?
It is not a public accommodation.

On 7/6/16 11:22 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:21:22 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


Gee, you should have been booked on Morning Joe, where the gang of
Repubican Hillary Haters are all excoriating Mrs. Clinton and winking at
Trump's admiring comments yesterday about Saddam Hussein...

"He was a bad guy -- really bad guy. But you know what? He did well? He
killed terrorists. He did that so good. They didn't read them the
rights. They didn't talk. They were terrorists. Over. Today, Iraq is
Harvard for terrorism," Trump said.

So now you are saying GWB was right, taking down Saddam?



No, I am commenting on Trump's inability to control his tongue in regard
to his admiration of Saddam's techniques. You really ought to stop
projecting your conclusions about the meaning of the words of others.

"He did well."

Yup.

On 7/6/16 11:25 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:30:22 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
Here's a hint for you, ...the "members of a private organization"
quotation is found in the "platform" of the Loonytarian Party. Perhaps
you can figure out how to google that.

Get back to us with your findings.

What part of "private" are you having a problem with?
It is not a public accommodation.



I recall Randy Paul talking about why he believed restaurant owners and
others in that sort of biz should be able to discriminate as they wish.

In case you forgot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92M3mSKbwR4

The Pauls, father and son, are the most prominent loonytarians. And Ron
Paul had his name attached to some brochures that were blatantly
anti-Semitic.

Have nice day.

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:15:47 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.


I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.



Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an
individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin,
gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be
inherited socially from parents).

Many people who deviate have control over their "gender preference". Remove the word preference, and you would be correct.

On 7/6/16 11:38 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 11:15:47 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:45:59 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.

If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.


Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?

"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.


I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.



Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an
individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin,
gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be
inherited socially from parents).

Many people who deviate have control over their "gender preference". Remove the word preference, and you would be correct.



Oh? Define "many" in terms of a percentage. Please. And from your
personal knowledge and study. No cites, please, from right-wingers,
fundamentalist preachers, et cetera, or groups that promote the
right-wing agenda.

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:15:45 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/6/16 11:09 AM, wrote:

I imagine if they had a sign that said they would not serve people
with an NRA hat, that would be fine with you.



Typically, anti-discrimination laws target discrimination over which an
individual has no control, such as race, ethnicity, country of origin,
gender preference and, usually but not always, religion (tends to be
inherited socially from parents).

Political speech is constitutionally protected, public accommodation
is not.