I'm sorry I sold my 'sport' model 303 rifle for $20.00 back when I was working.
Ammo was easy to get. Old timers used to say millions of rounds, including tracers, were dumped into the harbour after the 2nd world war.

5:52 AMTrue North

"Ammo was easy to get. Old timers used to say millions of rounds, including tracers, were dumped into the harbour after the 2nd world war."
----

I can believe it.

On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 03:52:51 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

I'm sorry I sold my 'sport' model 303 rifle for $20.00 back when I was working.
Ammo was easy to get. Old timers used to say millions of rounds, including tracers, were dumped into the harbour after the 2nd world war.


I think the problem started when the last of the WWII surplus dried
up. There are still plenty of companies loading .303 but I don't think
there is much that is cheap, It is .75 to a buck a round at the bulk
guys.
The Brits went to the NATO calibers decades ago.

10:23
- show quoted text -
I think the problem started when the last of the WWII surplus dried
up. There are still plenty of companies loading .303 but I don't think
there is much that is cheap, It is .75 to a buck a round at the bulk
guys.
The Brits went to the NATO calibers decades ago.
.....

The .303 is still standard for the ancient and accepted Lewis gun which is still in the queens arsenal since ww1. Hard to improve a hammer.

On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:49:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

10:23
- show quoted text -
I think the problem started when the last of the WWII surplus dried
up. There are still plenty of companies loading .303 but I don't think
there is much that is cheap, It is .75 to a buck a round at the bulk
guys.
The Brits went to the NATO calibers decades ago.
....

The .303 is still standard for the ancient and accepted Lewis gun which is still in the queens arsenal since ww1. Hard to improve a hammer.

In the days of belt fed machine guns I find it hard to believe a Lewis
is actually taken seriously. I could understand it in WWII when
anything that went bang was needed but now, just the logistics would
be a nightmare. That is one reason why NATO tried to standardize down
to 4 basic calibers.

11:03
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:49:42 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
- show quoted text -
In the days of belt fed machine guns I find it hard to believe a Lewis
is actually taken seriously. I could understand it in WWII when
anything that went bang was needed but now, just the logistics would
be a nightmare. That is one reason why NATO tried to standardize down
to 4 basic calibers.
----
Think British, man. Think British!

I can't say it truly is in the queens arsenal today, though it might be in reserves, but the Lewis showed its head at the Fauklands a few years ago.

On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:07:22 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Think British, man. Think British!

I can't say it truly is in the queens arsenal today, though it might be in reserves, but the Lewis showed its head at the Fauklands a few years ago.

Yeah you are right, They still have a Queen. I guess they never get
rid of any anachronism

On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:52:16 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:07:22 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Think British, man. Think British!

I can't say it truly is in the queens arsenal today, though it might be in reserves, but the Lewis showed its head at the Fauklands a few years ago.

Yeah you are right, They still have a Queen. I guess they never get
rid of any anachronism

===

And they still drive on the left when most of the world is on the
right. How weird is that?

wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 03:52:51 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

I'm sorry I sold my 'sport' model 303 rifle for $20.00 back when I was working.
Ammo was easy to get. Old timers used to say millions of rounds,
including tracers, were dumped into the harbour after the 2nd world war.


I think the problem started when the last of the WWII surplus dried
up. There are still plenty of companies loading .303 but I don't think
there is much that is cheap, It is .75 to a buck a round at the bulk
guys.
The Brits went to the NATO calibers decades ago.


Except for the powder, could be a great mining opportunity in the Harbour.
The value of brass and lead.

On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:04:14 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 03:52:51 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

I'm sorry I sold my 'sport' model 303 rifle for $20.00 back when I was working.
Ammo was easy to get. Old timers used to say millions of rounds,
including tracers, were dumped into the harbour after the 2nd world war.


I think the problem started when the last of the WWII surplus dried
up. There are still plenty of companies loading .303 but I don't think
there is much that is cheap, It is .75 to a buck a round at the bulk
guys.
The Brits went to the NATO calibers decades ago.


Except for the powder, could be a great mining opportunity in the Harbour.
The value of brass and lead.

I doubt the value of the metal would mitigate the dangers of 70 year
old cordite and dealing with the marine fouling.