#48
 

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:56:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:38:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:07:07 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:37:01 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:16:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization."

You will get a bunch of hits from partisan organizations. So what?
Google just about anything negative along with "Clinton" and see what
you get.

"Clinton is a terrorist" gets about 591,000 results (0.48 seconds). She must be a terrorist.

===

Googled "Harry Krause is an ass wipe" and got 246,000 results, some of
which very definitely refer to our hero.

Proof positive, using Krauselogic.


Even funnier, when I google "Trump voters," the names of all the
right-wing trash in rec.bloats pops up.

....and most likely your name is in there several hundred times!

Go check out the 'A Virtual Classic' thread.

#48
 

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:56:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:13:14 -0400, Alex wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote:

I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has
the
threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My
NFA
Trust
is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of
these
at the
Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street -
and all
you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the
shell
casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of
choice
but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in
person than
the photo on ruger.com.

When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying
five
guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I
can't think
of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch
but he
evidently has an impressive collection.

His last name was 'Smithsonian'?

It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count.

Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden
Corrall last time we took the kids
for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I
had. Got a few dirty looks from
liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction.



Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it
will
be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie.
It's
still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no
arrival date yet.

Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog?

Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front
amongst your liberal, gun-hating
buddies here?


Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved
revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in
fact, have never been used.

The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with
your lies, deadbeat.


Uh, no, **** for brains.


My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently
it's equally hard for you:

On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right?


"The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single
action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in
.45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not
fired since. They're safe queens."


Yet that was a lie, 'eh?

1/7/2008

"The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a
couple
of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as
soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot
it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that
shoots .40 S&W.

These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on
consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of
the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said,
and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice
presentation box."




Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and
sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I
sold this week.


Bull****, liar.

Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot
them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few years later, he'd forget that he'd
owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros, this time only fired at the
factory, and store them in his safe.

Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;)


The second set were engraved, unfired, and in a fancy presentation box,
probably fancier than the pine box in which you'll be taking your final
dirt nap.

Don't you have upcoming surgery, or are you all finished until something
else in your crumbling body fails?


Wait, the first set was in a "nice presentation box." Did Ruger actually sell a matched pair, with
consecutive serial numbers, in a presentation box *without* engraving?

(How much deeper are you going to keep digging this hole?)

#48
 

On 6/11/16 8:56 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:56:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:13:14 -0400, Alex wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote:

I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has
the
threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My
NFA
Trust
is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of
these
at the
Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street -
and all
you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the
shell
casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of
choice
but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in
person than
the photo on ruger.com.

When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying
five
guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I
can't think
of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch
but he
evidently has an impressive collection.

His last name was 'Smithsonian'?

It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count.

Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden
Corrall last time we took the kids
for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I
had. Got a few dirty looks from
liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction.



Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it
will
be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie.
It's
still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no
arrival date yet.

Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog?

Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front
amongst your liberal, gun-hating
buddies here?


Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved
revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in
fact, have never been used.

The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with
your lies, deadbeat.


Uh, no, **** for brains.


My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently
it's equally hard for you:

On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right?


"The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single
action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in
.45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not
fired since. They're safe queens."


Yet that was a lie, 'eh?

1/7/2008

"The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a
couple
of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as
soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot
it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that
shoots .40 S&W.

These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on
consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of
the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said,
and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice
presentation box."




Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and
sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I
sold this week.


Bull****, liar.

Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot
them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few years later, he'd forget that he'd
owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros, this time only fired at the
factory, and store them in his safe.

Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;)


The second set were engraved, unfired, and in a fancy presentation box,
probably fancier than the pine box in which you'll be taking your final
dirt nap.

Don't you have upcoming surgery, or are you all finished until something
else in your crumbling body fails?


Wait, the first set was in a "nice presentation box." Did Ruger actually sell a matched pair, with
consecutive serial numbers, in a presentation box *without* engraving?

(How much deeper are you going to keep digging this hole?)


1. I don't know.

2. Go vote for Trump.

#48
 

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:00:48 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/11/16 8:56 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:56:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
snippage

The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with
your lies, deadbeat.


Uh, no, **** for brains.


My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently
it's equally hard for you:

On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right?


"The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single
action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in
.45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not
fired since. They're safe queens."


Yet that was a lie, 'eh?

1/7/2008

"The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a
couple
of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as
soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot
it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that
shoots .40 S&W.

These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on
consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of
the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said,
and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice
presentation box."




Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and
sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I
sold this week.


Bull****, liar.

Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot
them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few years later, he'd forget that he'd
owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros, this time only fired at the
factory, and store them in his safe.

Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;)


The second set were engraved, unfired, and in a fancy presentation box,
probably fancier than the pine box in which you'll be taking your final
dirt nap.

Don't you have upcoming surgery, or are you all finished until something
else in your crumbling body fails?


Wait, the first set was in a "nice presentation box." Did Ruger actually sell a matched pair, with
consecutive serial numbers, in a presentation box *without* engraving?

(How much deeper are you going to keep digging this hole?)


1. I don't know.

If I were you, I'd try to change the subject.

2. Go vote for Trump.

Oh, I see you have.

#48
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/11/16 8:56 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:56:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:13:14 -0400, Alex wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex
wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex
wrote:

I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45.
This has
the
threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a
suppressor. My
NFA
Trust
is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of
these
at the
Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the
street -
and all
you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target
and the
shell
casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first
color of
choice
but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks
better in
person than
the photo on ruger.com.

When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was
buying
five
guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000
guns! I
can't think
of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of
scratch
but he
evidently has an impressive collection.

His last name was 'Smithsonian'?

It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count.

Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to
Golden
Corrall last time we took the kids
for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a
great hat I
had. Got a few dirty looks from
liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction.



Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today,
where it
will
be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No
biggie.
It's
still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on
allocation...no
arrival date yet.

Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog?

Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be
up front
amongst your liberal, gun-hating
buddies here?


Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector"
hand-engraved
revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use
and, in
fact, have never been used.

The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep
up with
your lies, deadbeat.


Uh, no, **** for brains.


My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently
it's equally hard for you:

On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right?


"The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single
action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered
Vaqueros in
.45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory
and not
fired since. They're safe queens."


Yet that was a lie, 'eh?

1/7/2008

"The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a
couple
of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me),
and as
soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to
shoot
it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that
shoots .40 S&W.

These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they
were on
consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail.
One of
the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop
owner said,
and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers,
nice
presentation box."




Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and
sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I
sold this week.


Bull****, liar.

Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively
numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot
them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few
years later, he'd forget that he'd
owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered
Vaqueros, this time only fired at the
factory, and store them in his safe.

Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;)


The second set were engraved, unfired, and in a fancy presentation box,
probably fancier than the pine box in which you'll be taking your final
dirt nap.

Don't you have upcoming surgery, or are you all finished until
something
else in your crumbling body fails?


Wait, the first set was in a "nice presentation box." Did Ruger
actually sell a matched pair, with
consecutive serial numbers, in a presentation box *without* engraving?

(How much deeper are you going to keep digging this hole?)


1. I don't know.

Wrong answer. You just proved you lied. No surprise.

2. Go vote for Trump.

I'm left with no other choice.

#48
 

On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/11/16 8:56 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:56:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:13:14 -0400, Alex wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex
wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex
wrote:

I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45.
This has
the
threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a
suppressor. My
NFA
Trust
is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of
these
at the
Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the
street -
and all
you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target
and the
shell
casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first
color of
choice
but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks
better in
person than
the photo on ruger.com.

When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was
buying
five
guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000
guns! I
can't think
of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of
scratch
but he
evidently has an impressive collection.

His last name was 'Smithsonian'?

It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count.

Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to
Golden
Corrall last time we took the kids
for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a
great hat I
had. Got a few dirty looks from
liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction.



Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today,
where it
will
be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No
biggie.
It's
still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on
allocation...no
arrival date yet.

Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog?

Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be
up front
amongst your liberal, gun-hating
buddies here?


Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector"
hand-engraved
revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use
and, in
fact, have never been used.

The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep
up with
your lies, deadbeat.


Uh, no, **** for brains.


My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently
it's equally hard for you:

On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right?


"The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single
action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered
Vaqueros in
.45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory
and not
fired since. They're safe queens."


Yet that was a lie, 'eh?

1/7/2008

"The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a
couple
of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me),
and as
soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to
shoot
it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that
shoots .40 S&W.

These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they
were on
consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail.
One of
the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop
owner said,
and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers,
nice
presentation box."




Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and
sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I
sold this week.


Bull****, liar.

Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively
numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot
them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few
years later, he'd forget that he'd
owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered
Vaqueros, this time only fired at the
factory, and store them in his safe.

Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;)


The second set were engraved, unfired, and in a fancy presentation box,
probably fancier than the pine box in which you'll be taking your final
dirt nap.

Don't you have upcoming surgery, or are you all finished until
something
else in your crumbling body fails?


Wait, the first set was in a "nice presentation box." Did Ruger
actually sell a matched pair, with
consecutive serial numbers, in a presentation box *without* engraving?

(How much deeper are you going to keep digging this hole?)


1. I don't know.

Wrong answer. You just proved you lied. No surprise.

2. Go vote for Trump.

I'm left with no other choice.

That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur
liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar.

#48
 

On 6/12/16 7:40 AM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote:


2. Go vote for Trump.

I'm left with no other choice.

That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur
liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar.


Trump is the perfect candidate for white, racist, anti-ethnic, scared of
women piglets like his supporters in rec.boats. I'm glad you aren't
disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and
jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin.

Early polls don't mean a lot, but the very latest Reuters/IPSOS poll
shows Mrs. Clinton opening up an 11-point lead over Trumpster the
Dumpster.

http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13

#48
 

On 6/12/2016 8:31 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim,
who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean
Sarah Palin.

Who was it who had the opportunity to meet and chat with Peggie Hall and
passed because, why.

A. You harassed her on rec.boats for no good reason.
B. You had nothing in common to talk about. (She's a boater)
C. You have no balls.
D. You were afraid she'd read you the riot act.
E. You aren't bright enough to carry on a conversation with her.

You were almost close enough to reach out and touch her and you
chickened out.

And then there's the stalking issue with Mad Cow that you posted
pictures for proof.

And how about Karen from OZ. Another female whom you tried to
intimidate and just made yourself look foolish.

So don't project your shortcomings on me, asshole.

Have a spectacular day Harry.

#48
 

On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 10:33:07 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 6/12/2016 8:31 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim,
who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean
Sarah Palin.

Who was it who had the opportunity to meet and chat with Peggie Hall and
passed because, why.

A. You harassed her on rec.boats for no good reason.
B. You had nothing in common to talk about. (She's a boater)
C. You have no balls.
D. You were afraid she'd read you the riot act.
E. You aren't bright enough to carry on a conversation with her.

You were almost close enough to reach out and touch her and you
chickened out.

And then there's the stalking issue with Mad Cow that you posted
pictures for proof.

And how about Karen from OZ. Another female whom you tried to
intimidate and just made yourself look foolish.

So don't project your shortcomings on me, asshole.

Have a spectacular day Harry.

From 13 years ago:

" the one who has always attacked any women NG posters in a sad
display of sexism from a clearly inadequate person who can't even
communicate with the opposite sex,

the one who was so seriously ***ly maladjusted you needed to lie
about your therapist (probably court ordered) so she became your 15
to 20 yr younger beautiful successful wife,

the one who even followed some NG women from NG to NG, then

the one who went completely mad & posted specific details of your
real life stalking of at least two NG women, "

http://sporttoday.org/28_9124673969156982_1.htm

He's not changed much.

#48
 

On 6/12/16 10:33 AM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/12/2016 8:31 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim,
who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean
Sarah Palin.

Who was it who had the opportunity to meet and chat with Peggie Hall and
passed because, why.

A. You harassed her on rec.boats for no good reason.
B. You had nothing in common to talk about. (She's a boater)
C. You have no balls.
D. You were afraid she'd read you the riot act.
E. You aren't bright enough to carry on a conversation with her.

You were almost close enough to reach out and touch her and you
chickened out.

And then there's the stalking issue with Mad Cow that you posted
pictures for proof.

And how about Karen from OZ. Another female whom you tried to
intimidate and just made yourself look foolish.

So don't project your shortcomings on me, asshole.

Have a spectacular day Harry.


1. Ms. Hall was busy when I saw her at the Annapolis boat show, with
several others waiting in line to ask her about the products she was
demonstrating/speaking about. I didn't feel like waiting.

2. The only argument I had with her was about her right-wing politics.

3. Right, because you're the guy who would stand by and watch someone
beat up a woman, and probably cheer on the assailant.

7. Mad Cow was a boating moron, and the photos were photos she took and
posted on a boat club site.

8. Karen of Oz...gosh, whatever happened to her.

Oh, did you complete the 9th grade before you got in trouble with the
law and were ordered into the military or, if not, into jail?

You're a cowardly pussy, fella. You hide behind anonymity so you can
toss your junior high insults here. You wouldn't be behaving that way if
you were posting here with your identity generally known.