![]() |
#48
On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 4:43:34 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/12/16 4:43 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 15:34:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 3:06 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:39:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 7:31:12 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 7:40 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote: 2. Go vote for Trump. I'm left with no other choice. That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar. Trump is the perfect candidate for white, racist, anti-ethnic, scared of women piglets like his supporters in rec.boats. I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Early polls don't mean a lot, but the very latest Reuters/IPSOS poll shows Mrs. Clinton opening up an 11-point lead over Trumpster the Dumpster. http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13 I don't know of anyone here who is scared of women piglets. did you mean 'Sows?' hmmm, is that a demeaning to women remark you just made there, Harry? And 11 points isn't much to brag about. Not hardly at all. 30 , now that'd be diffrent... His anti-female attitude has shown itself over and over. Calling women 'piglets' is another example. D'oh. Trump used the term piglets to describe women. Show me. I think you're making up another lie. Prove me wrong. I can show you that you called women 'piglets'. Ahh, he used pigs...not piglets. My mistake. :) Calling women pigs, dogs, whatever, but call a woman a piglet and the pigs here on rec.boats take offense. Why would anyone in here call a woman a 'piglet?" I think you're hard up for material on this one, though. Odd, in your statement (the way it was written) you said 'women piglets' I didn't see anyone say a thing about it. I admit I called it to your attention. |
#48
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 17:43:32 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/12/16 4:43 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 15:34:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 3:06 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:39:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 7:31:12 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 7:40 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote: 2. Go vote for Trump. I'm left with no other choice. That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar. Trump is the perfect candidate for white, racist, anti-ethnic, scared of women piglets like his supporters in rec.boats. I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Early polls don't mean a lot, but the very latest Reuters/IPSOS poll shows Mrs. Clinton opening up an 11-point lead over Trumpster the Dumpster. http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13 I don't know of anyone here who is scared of women piglets. did you mean 'Sows?' hmmm, is that a demeaning to women remark you just made there, Harry? And 11 points isn't much to brag about. Not hardly at all. 30 , now that'd be diffrent... His anti-female attitude has shown itself over and over. Calling women 'piglets' is another example. D'oh. Trump used the term piglets to describe women. Show me. I think you're making up another lie. Prove me wrong. I can show you that you called women 'piglets'. Ahh, he used pigs...not piglets. My mistake. :) Calling women pigs, dogs, whatever, but call a woman a piglet and the pigs here on rec.boats take offense. Yup, we took offense at your calling women piglets. Then you blamed Trump. A lie. Now you take umbrage with folks here who caught you in yet another f'ing lie. A bag of dog **** has more worth than you, Krause, and it probably draws less flies. |
#48
On 6/12/16 5:57 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 17:43:32 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 4:43 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 15:34:23 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 3:06 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:39:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 7:31:12 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 7:40 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote: 2. Go vote for Trump. I'm left with no other choice. That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar. Trump is the perfect candidate for white, racist, anti-ethnic, scared of women piglets like his supporters in rec.boats. I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Early polls don't mean a lot, but the very latest Reuters/IPSOS poll shows Mrs. Clinton opening up an 11-point lead over Trumpster the Dumpster. http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13 I don't know of anyone here who is scared of women piglets. did you mean 'Sows?' hmmm, is that a demeaning to women remark you just made there, Harry? And 11 points isn't much to brag about. Not hardly at all. 30 , now that'd be diffrent... His anti-female attitude has shown itself over and over. Calling women 'piglets' is another example. D'oh. Trump used the term piglets to describe women. Show me. I think you're making up another lie. Prove me wrong. I can show you that you called women 'piglets'. Ahh, he used pigs...not piglets. My mistake. :) Calling women pigs, dogs, whatever, but call a woman a piglet and the pigs here on rec.boats take offense. Yup, we took offense at your calling women piglets. Then you blamed Trump. A lie. Now you take umbrage with folks here who caught you in yet another f'ing lie. A bag of dog **** has more worth than you, Krause, and it probably draws less flies. Oh, dear...Trump called women "pigs," not "piglets." What a horrible error I made. But here is what is real... *you* and several other of the GOPers here will vote for Trump. Oink your way to your polling place. |
#48
On 6/12/2016 5:41 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/12/16 4:53 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 2:34:26 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 3:06 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:39:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 7:31:12 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 7:40 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote: 2. Go vote for Trump. I'm left with no other choice. That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar. Trump is the perfect candidate for white, racist, anti-ethnic, scared of women piglets like his supporters in rec.boats. I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Early polls don't mean a lot, but the very latest Reuters/IPSOS poll shows Mrs. Clinton opening up an 11-point lead over Trumpster the Dumpster. http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13 I don't know of anyone here who is scared of women piglets. did you mean 'Sows?' hmmm, is that a demeaning to women remark you just made there, Harry? And 11 points isn't much to brag about. Not hardly at all. 30 , now that'd be diffrent... His anti-female attitude has shown itself over and over. Calling women 'piglets' is another example. D'oh. Trump used the term piglets to describe women. well something that blatant should be easily googled then. But it isn't. So... My mistake, he called women pigs not piglets... Here's an example: http://tinyurl.com/jupmdwm I find it humorous that you fellas are defending the Trump pig. More of a lie than a mistake, asshole. |
#48
On 6/12/16 6:52 PM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/12/2016 5:41 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 4:53 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 2:34:26 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 3:06 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:39:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 7:31:12 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 7:40 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote: 2. Go vote for Trump. I'm left with no other choice. That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar. Trump is the perfect candidate for white, racist, anti-ethnic, scared of women piglets like his supporters in rec.boats. I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Early polls don't mean a lot, but the very latest Reuters/IPSOS poll shows Mrs. Clinton opening up an 11-point lead over Trumpster the Dumpster. http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13 I don't know of anyone here who is scared of women piglets. did you mean 'Sows?' hmmm, is that a demeaning to women remark you just made there, Harry? And 11 points isn't much to brag about. Not hardly at all. 30 , now that'd be diffrent... His anti-female attitude has shown itself over and over. Calling women 'piglets' is another example. D'oh. Trump used the term piglets to describe women. well something that blatant should be easily googled then. But it isn't. So... My mistake, he called women pigs not piglets... Here's an example: http://tinyurl.com/jupmdwm I find it humorous that you fellas are defending the Trump pig. More of a lie than a mistake, asshole. Trump is your piglet. |
#48
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 15:34:42 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 6/12/16 2:39 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 7:31:12 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 7:40 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote: 2. Go vote for Trump. I'm left with no other choice. That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar. Trump is the perfect candidate for white, racist, anti-ethnic, scared of women piglets like his supporters in rec.boats. I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Early polls don't mean a lot, but the very latest Reuters/IPSOS poll shows Mrs. Clinton opening up an 11-point lead over Trumpster the Dumpster. http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13 I don't know of anyone here who is scared of women piglets. did you mean 'Sows?' hmmm, is that a demeaning to women remark you just made there, Harry? And 11 points isn't much to brag about. Not hardly at all. 30 , now that'd be diffrent... An 11 point spread on election day is a landslide. A single poll an early June is not the election. You Remocrat/Depublican folks don't even have confirmed candidates yet. It will be a long hot summer and lots of things can happen. |
#48
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 17:43:32 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Ahh, he used pigs...not piglets. My mistake. :) Calling women pigs, dogs, whatever, but call a woman a piglet and the pigs here on rec.boats take offense. He has said he only called Rosie O'Donnell a fat pig, not all women. Opinions may vary a little on that. You are no stranger to offensive names for people. |
#48
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 17:48:51 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote: I've never met an individual who can and does lie as you do. Never got to meet Hillary? |
#48
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:47:56 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote: Karen's property records don't list Harry as a co owner. I doubt you could find anything positive about Harry Krause on line. === If Harry owned anything in his own name the IRS would be all over it. |
#48
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:34:50 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote: On 6/12/2016 10:40 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 10:33:07 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/12/2016 8:31 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Who was it who had the opportunity to meet and chat with Peggie Hall and passed because, why. A. You harassed her on rec.boats for no good reason. B. You had nothing in common to talk about. (She's a boater) C. You have no balls. D. You were afraid she'd read you the riot act. E. You aren't bright enough to carry on a conversation with her. You were almost close enough to reach out and touch her and you chickened out. And then there's the stalking issue with Mad Cow that you posted pictures for proof. And how about Karen from OZ. Another female whom you tried to intimidate and just made yourself look foolish. So don't project your shortcomings on me, asshole. Have a spectacular day Harry. From 13 years ago: " the one who has always attacked any women NG posters in a sad display of sexism from a clearly inadequate person who can't even communicate with the opposite sex, the one who was so seriously ***ly maladjusted you needed to lie about your therapist (probably court ordered) so she became your 15 to 20 yr younger beautiful successful wife, the one who even followed some NG women from NG to NG, then the one who went completely mad & posted specific details of your real life stalking of at least two NG women, " http://sporttoday.org/28_9124673969156982_1.htm He's not changed much. The sad thing is that Harry doesn't see himself as the dirtbag he is. He seems unphased by the barrage of uncomplimentary comments about him coming from all quarters. How can so many people misjudge him? === You forget that one of Harry's real objectives is just to attract attention to himself. Starting controversy (trolling) would be a close second. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com