BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   #48 (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/171152-48.html)

Keyser Söze June 10th 16 07:16 PM

#48
 
On 6/10/16 2:06 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:02:24 -0500, "Ryan P." wrote:

On 6/9/2016 7:17 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:14 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:42:25 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:


Might not have been "liberals." Might have been non-aligned citizens who
are horrified by your pimping for a terrorist organization. I still get
mailings from the NRA, which I usually return in an unstamped envelope
with the hope the terrorists have to pay postage due.

LOL If they are "horrified, non-aligned citizens" all because of some
hat then they have some very serious problems. Probably can't go to
the bathroom by themselves either.



D'oh. It's not the hat, it's the symbolism. The NRA is a terrorist
organization.


What do you define at "terrorism?"


Asked and unanswered. Questions about Harry's moronic statements are, in his terms, moronic
questions. I suppose that makes some kind of sense.


No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization."

[email protected] June 10th 16 08:37 PM

#48
 
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:16:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization."


You will get a bunch of hits from partisan organizations. So what?
Google just about anything negative along with "Clinton" and see what
you get.

Poquito Loco June 10th 16 09:07 PM

#48
 
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:37:01 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:16:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization."


You will get a bunch of hits from partisan organizations. So what?
Google just about anything negative along with "Clinton" and see what
you get.


"Clinton is a terrorist" gets about 591,000 results (0.48 seconds). She must be a terrorist.

Alex[_9_] June 11th 16 01:13 AM

#48
 
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote:

I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has
the
threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My
NFA
Trust
is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of
these
at the
Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street -
and all
you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the
shell
casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of
choice
but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in
person than
the photo on ruger.com.

When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying
five
guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I
can't think
of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch
but he
evidently has an impressive collection.

His last name was 'Smithsonian'?

It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count.

Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden
Corrall last time we took the kids
for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I
had. Got a few dirty looks from
liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction.



Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it
will
be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie.
It's
still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no
arrival date yet.

Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog?

Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front
amongst your liberal, gun-hating
buddies here?


Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved
revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in
fact, have never been used.

The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with
your lies, deadbeat.


Uh, no, **** for brains.



My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently
it's equally hard for you:

On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right?


"The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single
action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in
.45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not
fired since. They're safe queens."


Yet that was a lie, 'eh?

1/7/2008

"The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a
couple
of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as
soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot
it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that
shoots .40 S&W.

These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on
consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of
the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said,
and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice
presentation box."




Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and
sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I
sold this week.


Bull****, liar.

Alex[_9_] June 11th 16 01:14 AM

#48
 
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:04:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote:

I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has
the
threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA
Trust
is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these
at the
Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street -
and all
you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the
shell
casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of
choice
but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in
person than
the photo on ruger.com.

When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying
five
guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I
can't think
of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch
but he
evidently has an impressive collection.

His last name was 'Smithsonian'?
It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count.
Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden
Corrall last time we took the kids
for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I
had. Got a few dirty looks from
liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction.


Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it
will
be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's
still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no
arrival date yet.

Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog?
Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front
amongst your liberal, gun-hating
buddies here?

Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved
revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in
fact, have never been used.
The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with
your lies, deadbeat.

Uh, no, **** for brains.

My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently
it's equally hard for you:

On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right?


"The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single
action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in
.45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not
fired since. They're safe queens."


Yet that was a lie, 'eh?

1/7/2008

"The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple
of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as
soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot
it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that
shoots .40 S&W.

These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on
consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of
the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said,
and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice
presentation box."



Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold
three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this
week.

I *knew* I was right on the money!


Next time, STFU and let him make up his own lies!


Wayne.B June 11th 16 01:38 AM

#48
 
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:07:07 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:37:01 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:16:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization."


You will get a bunch of hits from partisan organizations. So what?
Google just about anything negative along with "Clinton" and see what
you get.


"Clinton is a terrorist" gets about 591,000 results (0.48 seconds). She must be a terrorist.


===

Googled "Harry Krause is an ass wipe" and got 246,000 results, some of
which very definitely refer to our hero.

Poquito Loco June 11th 16 11:45 AM

#48
 
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:13:14 -0400, Alex wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote:

I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has
the
threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My
NFA
Trust
is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of
these
at the
Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street -
and all
you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the
shell
casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of
choice
but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in
person than
the photo on ruger.com.

When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying
five
guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I
can't think
of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch
but he
evidently has an impressive collection.

His last name was 'Smithsonian'?

It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count.

Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden
Corrall last time we took the kids
for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I
had. Got a few dirty looks from
liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction.



Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it
will
be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie.
It's
still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no
arrival date yet.

Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog?

Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front
amongst your liberal, gun-hating
buddies here?


Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved
revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in
fact, have never been used.

The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with
your lies, deadbeat.


Uh, no, **** for brains.


My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently
it's equally hard for you:

On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right?


"The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single
action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in
.45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not
fired since. They're safe queens."


Yet that was a lie, 'eh?

1/7/2008

"The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a
couple
of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as
soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot
it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that
shoots .40 S&W.

These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on
consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of
the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said,
and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice
presentation box."




Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and
sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I
sold this week.


Bull****, liar.


Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot
them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few years later, he'd forget that he'd
owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros, this time only fired at the
factory, and store them in his safe.

Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;)

Imagine having to see this each time he looks in a mirror:

https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/p/1/...a2/1c3668d.jpg

Poquito Loco June 11th 16 11:45 AM

#48
 
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:38:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:07:07 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:37:01 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:16:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization."

You will get a bunch of hits from partisan organizations. So what?
Google just about anything negative along with "Clinton" and see what
you get.


"Clinton is a terrorist" gets about 591,000 results (0.48 seconds). She must be a terrorist.


===

Googled "Harry Krause is an ass wipe" and got 246,000 results, some of
which very definitely refer to our hero.


Proof positive, using Krauselogic.

Keyser Söze June 11th 16 11:56 AM

#48
 
On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:13:14 -0400, Alex wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote:

I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has
the
threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My
NFA
Trust
is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of
these
at the
Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street -
and all
you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the
shell
casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of
choice
but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in
person than
the photo on ruger.com.

When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying
five
guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I
can't think
of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch
but he
evidently has an impressive collection.

His last name was 'Smithsonian'?

It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count.

Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden
Corrall last time we took the kids
for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I
had. Got a few dirty looks from
liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction.



Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it
will
be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie.
It's
still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no
arrival date yet.

Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog?

Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front
amongst your liberal, gun-hating
buddies here?


Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved
revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in
fact, have never been used.

The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with
your lies, deadbeat.


Uh, no, **** for brains.


My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently
it's equally hard for you:

On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right?


"The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single
action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in
.45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not
fired since. They're safe queens."


Yet that was a lie, 'eh?

1/7/2008

"The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a
couple
of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as
soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot
it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that
shoots .40 S&W.

These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on
consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of
the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said,
and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice
presentation box."




Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and
sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I
sold this week.


Bull****, liar.


Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot
them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few years later, he'd forget that he'd
owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros, this time only fired at the
factory, and store them in his safe.

Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;)


The second set were engraved, unfired, and in a fancy presentation box,
probably fancier than the pine box in which you'll be taking your final
dirt nap.

Don't you have upcoming surgery, or are you all finished until something
else in your crumbling body fails?



Keyser Söze June 11th 16 11:56 AM

#48
 
On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:38:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:07:07 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:37:01 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:16:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization."

You will get a bunch of hits from partisan organizations. So what?
Google just about anything negative along with "Clinton" and see what
you get.

"Clinton is a terrorist" gets about 591,000 results (0.48 seconds). She must be a terrorist.


===

Googled "Harry Krause is an ass wipe" and got 246,000 results, some of
which very definitely refer to our hero.


Proof positive, using Krauselogic.


Even funnier, when I google "Trump voters," the names of all the
right-wing trash in rec.bloats pops up.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com