Harry Krause wrote:
K Smith wrote:


Jack Rye wrote:

What you fail to understand is. All I found out was that you have a

US trade

mark. It doesn't mean a thing. You can't enforce the taipan trade mark.
For one thing it's a word in the dictionary. Which means you don't

own it.

Two it's not original. You also submitted the artwork as typed so that
limits you ability to enforce Taipan. Basically your screwed. With no
recourse at all. So basically you spent your $$$. Big deal, you

just have

a unenforceable mark. I never found a company that builds boats or boat
engines either. So what ever you think you got, good luck.

BTW don't slam the door when your glass house has a gapping crack.

As to Harry I really don't care what you think about him. So don't

go away

mad just go away.

Also remember this. Clean environment means fewer health related

sickness.

Dear dear dear Jack you're a jealous little greeny weany aren't you??
As for your understandings of IP they're as faulty as all your others.

I hope you tell all the other US trade mark holders, indeed tell the
entire not insubstantial US IP industry your views, particularly Ford
will be very upset about their mustang, falcon, cobra, & so on & on &
on. Gee now there's something you might have done with your life Jack
save wasting it on your socialist crusades, you can advise people like
Ford, GM, Chrysler, Toyota & on & on & on related to these matters. Why
don't you start by infringing one of them just to prove your point I'll
watch with interest; damn your work will never be done.



If some idiot wanted to, tomorrow morning she could come out with a line
of Taipan Toilet Tissue, or open a funhouse in Vegas called the Mustang
Ranch where Cobra beer might be sold.

I agree with that & there are many registrations of it, 18 in the US
but many more in Aus, however only one in my classes.


Your stupid little registered trademark of "Taipan" for a non-existent
outboard motor that will never be sold in the United States (or anywhere
else) is not relevant.

Deary me; non existent?? you've seen the pics. Alas you are just a liar
who cannot substantiate any of your lies. The ones about your father are
particularly grievous, this is the stuff of school yard bullies but for
a senior person to besmirch his memory with your infantile lies is
disgraceful; you should be ashamed, but of course you're not.


Stupid name for an outboard, anyway. Why would you name a product you
want to sell after an obscure Australian poisonous snake? It's not as if
you have the money, style and panache of Ford Motor Company and can
actually market a product named after an animal.

No; but what can I tell ya, Ficht just wasn't available & now not even
the French want it:-)


Go back to scrubbing floors in the outhouse, Ms. Smith. That's where you
peter-principled.

That's the lying sexist Harry we all know & hate.

K