| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Brown shirts for all!
A group of Donald Trump supporters over the weekend called for
volunteers to join a would-be militia aiming to protect voters against so-called “violent far-left agitators.” |
Brown shirts for all!
On 3/15/2016 7:25 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
A group of Donald Trump supporters over the weekend called for volunteers to join a would-be militia aiming to protect voters against so-called “violent far-left agitators.” This whole election is already a circus having Hillary "I'm Really Black" Clinton and a Donald "My hands are bigger than yours" Trump as the leading candidates. Lefties don't like it when people push back against their protests. This will only lead to more altercations, creating a bigger circus. |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:25:08 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: A group of Donald Trump supporters over the weekend called for volunteers to join a would-be militia aiming to protect voters against so-called “violent far-left agitators.” They would be far more effective if they were sent to disrupt the Hillary rallies and make sure it is recorded like people do to Trump. The problem is the ticket cost but Trump can afford it. The Democrats have goons protecting their rallies too, it just does not make the news. |
Brown shirts for all!
|
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? |
Brown shirts for all!
|
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. |
Brown shirts for all!
wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 3/15/16 11:10 AM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:25:08 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: A group of Donald Trump supporters over the weekend called for volunteers to join a would-be militia aiming to protect voters against so-called violent far-left agitators. They would be far more effective if they were sent to disrupt the Hillary rallies and make sure it is recorded like people do to Trump. The problem is the ticket cost but Trump can afford it. The Democrats have goons protecting their rallies too, it just does not make the news. I've gotten invites to two Hillary rally/events, one in Florida and the other in Illinois. There was no donation requirement for a ticket. I didn't go to either, but I plan on attending an event in Virginia once she is the nominee and in Maryland, if there is one. Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. I'll bet your Loonytarian candidates would love some hecklers...it would assure that there really was someone in the audience, eh? Must not have been anything important. Check out the 'ticket prices' for these. http://hillaryspeeches.com/scheduled-events/ You were probably invited to an election night watch in some bar. https://www.hillaryclinton.com/event...=orlando%2C+fl -- Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns! |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote:
wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. That's your reply when you get backed against the wall? More Krausescheie, eh Krause? -- Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns! |
Brown shirts for all!
On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. That's your reply when you get backed against the wall? More Krausescheie, eh Krause? -- Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems to be quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as men's room porter. |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. Brain fart Are you really trying to tell us there are no protests at a Hillary rally? If not then who are the disrupters? If the GOP protesters are so non confrontive and non violent that it is not even newsworthy, then I rest my case. |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. That's your reply when you get backed against the wall? More Krausescheie, eh Krause? -- Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems to be quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as men's room porter. Even more Krausescheie, eh Krause? You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause? -- Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns! |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 3:24:20 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does.. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. Brain fart Are you really trying to tell us there are no protests at a Hillary rally? If not then who are the disrupters? If the GOP protesters are so non confrontive and non violent that it is not even newsworthy, then I rest my case. You remember the story I linked about the "protester" that Hilly had bumped from her rally, don't you? The one with the scary postcard-sized sign? |
Brown shirts for all!
On 3/15/16 3:24 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. Brain fart Are you really trying to tell us there are no protests at a Hillary rally? If not then who are the disrupters? If the GOP protesters are so non confrontive and non violent that it is not even newsworthy, then I rest my case. No, Breitbart has openings for conspiracy believers like you. You have evidence "the networks" are choosing not to show demonstrations at Hillary/Bernie rallies? You have evidence Bernie/Hillary are threatening demonstrators and urging the crowds to take them out? That's what I am commenting upon, not your conspiracies to hide the news or whatever the point is you are not making. |
Brown shirts for all!
On 3/15/16 3:44 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. That's your reply when you get backed against the wall? More Krausescheie, eh Krause? -- Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems to be quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as men's room porter. Even more Krausescheie, eh Krause? You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause? -- I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter. |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:00:58 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote: You remember the story I linked about the "protester" that Hilly had bumped from her rally, don't you? The one with the scary postcard-sized sign? Yup she sicced the secret service on him, like he was going to cause some serious paper cuts with his ripped up sign. Dallas BTW if you are keeping score. Maybe democrats are a little more nervous there ;-) |
Brown shirts for all!
|
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:05:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 3/15/16 3:24 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. Brain fart Are you really trying to tell us there are no protests at a Hillary rally? If not then who are the disrupters? If the GOP protesters are so non confrontive and non violent that it is not even newsworthy, then I rest my case. No, Breitbart has openings for conspiracy believers like you. You have evidence "the networks" are choosing not to show demonstrations at Hillary/Bernie rallies? You have evidence Bernie/Hillary are threatening demonstrators and urging the crowds to take them out? That's what I am commenting upon, not your conspiracies to hide the news or whatever the point is you are not making. If I believe you I am left to believe there are no protests at hillary rallies and certainly no violent protests. Isn't that complimenting the civility of the GOP protesters? The reality is there have only been a handful of violent incidents at trump rallies and in at least one, it was a black guy throwing a major league punch at a trump guy. |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter. It is interesting that we can only call your responses "trump like". (non-responsive and vicious) I still believe that if trump was running as a democrat, insulting republicans, he would be your guy. |
Brown shirts for all!
On 3/15/16 5:35 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:05:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/15/16 3:24 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. Brain fart Are you really trying to tell us there are no protests at a Hillary rally? If not then who are the disrupters? If the GOP protesters are so non confrontive and non violent that it is not even newsworthy, then I rest my case. No, Breitbart has openings for conspiracy believers like you. You have evidence "the networks" are choosing not to show demonstrations at Hillary/Bernie rallies? You have evidence Bernie/Hillary are threatening demonstrators and urging the crowds to take them out? That's what I am commenting upon, not your conspiracies to hide the news or whatever the point is you are not making. If I believe you I am left to believe there are no protests at hillary rallies and certainly no violent protests. Isn't that complimenting the civility of the GOP protesters? The reality is there have only been a handful of violent incidents at trump rallies and in at least one, it was a black guy throwing a major league punch at a trump guy. The reality is, Trump has been urging those who attend his rallies to beat up demonstrators and at least once he said he would pay the legal bills. That's the reality of Donald the Fascist. I haven't heard of Hillary or Bernie urging their crowds to beat up demonstrators. I am sure there are demonstrators at virtually all these events. It is Trump and Trump alone so far who has been exhorting violence on the demonstrators. And that was the point. Got it? |
Brown shirts for all!
|
Brown shirts for all!
wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:47:46 -0400 (EDT), fire man wrote: Yawn. Your points are as blunt as a pencil eraser. Do you really think folks regard you as a serious thinker? Harry has the same problem as the TV networks. Trump was just a joke to them and they all built him up to pump up their ratings. Now that he actually looks viable they are scared ****less. Harry thought it would be a hoot for hillary to run against him, now it may not be so funny. No matter who wins, I expect 4 more years of totally disfunctional government. I'm conflicted. I have no doubt Hillary will win the general, but I fret for the country when the other major party has Trump or maybe Cruz as its FRONTRUNNER. Maybe Hillary will cross party lines and pick kasich as her running mate. That'll just bury the GOP and leave the carcass for the evangelicals to form a Jesus party. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:48:03 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:47:46 -0400 (EDT), fire man wrote: Yawn. Your points are as blunt as a pencil eraser. Do you really think folks regard you as a serious thinker? Harry has the same problem as the TV networks. Trump was just a joke to them and they all built him up to pump up their ratings. Now that he actually looks viable they are scared ****less. Harry thought it would be a hoot for hillary to run against him, now it may not be so funny. No matter who wins, I expect 4 more years of totally disfunctional government. I'm conflicted. I have no doubt Hillary will win the general, but I fret for the country when the other major party has Trump or maybe Cruz as its FRONTRUNNER. Maybe Hillary will cross party lines and pick kasich as her running mate. That'll just bury the GOP and leave the carcass for the evangelicals to form a Jesus party. This is going to be a tough summer. The talking heads are saying Trump probably will not have enough delegates for a slam dunk at the convention and they are already speculating about what rule changes they will make to bury him. I am not sure who will come out on top or who will win in November but I am sure America will be the loser. I see 4 more years of a divided country and gridlock. There is more than a small chance that we will be in recession again by 2017, never really recovered from the last one. My gas price prediction is looking more accurate every day. Even without an incident in the middle east, prices are going back up. |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 3/15/16 3:44 PM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. That's your reply when you get backed against the wall? More Krausescheie, eh Krause? -- Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems to be quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as men's room porter. Even more Krausescheie, eh Krause? You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause? -- I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter. You chickened out again, Krause. Answer the question. Calling more names doesn't make you look more of a man. -- Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns! |
Brown shirts for all!
On 3/16/16 10:22 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 3:44 PM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. That's your reply when you get backed against the wall? More Krausescheie, eh Krause? -- Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems to be quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as men's room porter. Even more Krausescheie, eh Krause? You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause? -- I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter. You chickened out again, Krause. Answer the question. Calling more names doesn't make you look more of a man. -- Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh. Moron. |
Brown shirts for all!
On 3/16/2016 10:26 AM, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 3/16/16 10:22 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 3:44 PM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:02:52 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 2:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. That's your reply when you get backed against the wall? More Krausescheie, eh Krause? -- Breitbart has openings...it's staff of conspiracy reporters seems to be quitting. Thus, the opening. You probably could get a job there as men's room porter. Even more Krausescheie, eh Krause? You must feel rather ****ty when Greg trounces your ass, eh Krause? -- I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter. You chickened out again, Krause. Answer the question. Calling more names doesn't make you look more of a man. -- Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh. Moron. You had other options to do your duty. You were too cowardly to take any of those available to you. As your candidate would say,cackle cackle you coward. |
Brown shirts for all!
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:55:30 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote: Chickened out? Because I wasn't dumb enough to join the Army? Heheheh. Moron. You had other options to do your duty. You were too cowardly to take any of those available to you. As your candidate would say,cackle cackle you coward. He is of that hippie culture that said any service to your country was for suckers. I agree there were plenty of other options. He could have joined the Peace Corps or the Public Health Service and fulfilled his military obligations. |
Brown shirts for all!
|
Brown shirts for all!
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: There is nothing in the Constitution that requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and therefore there is no requirement, period. There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I was 17 but those are really not binding. It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for your country". |
Brown shirts for all!
|
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:44:40 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 3/15/16 5:38 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter. It is interesting that we can only call your responses "trump like". (non-responsive and vicious) I still believe that if trump was running as a democrat, insulting republicans, he would be your guy. And you would be as wrong as you usually are. As for Herring4Trump, he's demonstrated his racism any number of times. **** him. I don't think Greg mentioned me. But I can see you've used up about everything else you had. Better fall back on name-calling. -- Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns! |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:27:38 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 3/15/16 5:24 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:00:58 -0700 (PDT), Its Me wrote: You remember the story I linked about the "protester" that Hilly had bumped from her rally, don't you? The one with the scary postcard-sized sign? Yup she sicced the secret service on him, like he was going to cause some serious paper cuts with his ripped up sign. Dallas BTW if you are keeping score. Maybe democrats are a little more nervous there ;-) Did she exhort the crowd to beat him up as Trump has done? Did she offer to pay the legal bills for assaulting a demonstrator, as Trump has done? No? Didn't think so. She's cheap. -- Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns! |
Brown shirts for all!
On 3/16/16 1:38 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:44:40 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 5:38 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:06:38 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: I take it back...you were an Army puke who learned nothing useful and therefore could not handle a job as a men's room porter. It is interesting that we can only call your responses "trump like". (non-responsive and vicious) I still believe that if trump was running as a democrat, insulting republicans, he would be your guy. And you would be as wrong as you usually are. As for Herring4Trump, he's demonstrated his racism any number of times. **** him. I don't think Greg mentioned me. But I can see you've used up about everything else you had. Better fall back on name-calling. -- It doesn't matter whether Greg mentions you, Johnny4Trump. He's not in control of rec.boats, neither am I, and, most assuredly, neither are you? Don't like it? Go **** a golf club. |
Brown shirts for all!
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:43:03 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 3/15/16 5:35 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:05:40 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 3:24 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. Brain fart Are you really trying to tell us there are no protests at a Hillary rally? If not then who are the disrupters? If the GOP protesters are so non confrontive and non violent that it is not even newsworthy, then I rest my case. No, Breitbart has openings for conspiracy believers like you. You have evidence "the networks" are choosing not to show demonstrations at Hillary/Bernie rallies? You have evidence Bernie/Hillary are threatening demonstrators and urging the crowds to take them out? That's what I am commenting upon, not your conspiracies to hide the news or whatever the point is you are not making. If I believe you I am left to believe there are no protests at hillary rallies and certainly no violent protests. Isn't that complimenting the civility of the GOP protesters? The reality is there have only been a handful of violent incidents at trump rallies and in at least one, it was a black guy throwing a major league punch at a trump guy. The reality is, Trump has been urging those who attend his rallies to beat up demonstrators and at least once he said he would pay the legal bills. That's the reality of Donald the Fascist. I haven't heard of Hillary or Bernie urging their crowds to beat up demonstrators. I am sure there are demonstrators at virtually all these events. It is Trump and Trump alone so far who has been exhorting violence on the demonstrators. And that was the point. Got it? Site? Was he maybe telling supporters to beat up anyone who initiated an assault? Or are you just continuing your spread of Krausescheie? -- Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns! |
Brown shirts for all!
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:58:34 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 3/16/16 12:51 PM, wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: There is nothing in the Constitution that requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and therefore there is no requirement, period. There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I was 17 but those are really not binding. It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for your country". I was cognizant of what was going on in SE Asia while I was in college and immediately after, and felt a social obligation to speak out against the horrors we were perpetrating there to prop up a brutal dictatorship. I was working and obtaining a master's degree immediately after college, and while working at The Star was offered a government position that would have fulfilled a social obligation (agricultural assistance to farmers) in Vietnam, but by the time I was trained and ready, the position had been discontinued. Gosh, all that speaking out and you still volunteered to perform your 'Vietnam service', if you can be believed, which you can't. 'Agricultural assistance to farmers'? You knew more than the farmers? Or were you going to simply fertilize the Kansas wheat fields with your Krausescheie? -- Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns! |
Brown shirts for all!
On 3/16/16 1:56 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:43:03 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 5:35 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:05:40 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 3:24 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:20:02 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:30:58 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 1:03 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:35:55 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/15/16 12:27 PM, wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: Neither Hillary nor Bernie play the anti-heckler game your boy Trump plays. They don't threaten hecklers or urge that their crowd does. Since the networks choose not to show what happens, we don't know that do we? Oh, right...the networks are hiding it. Sheesh. If you don't think the networks control the news you see, you are more naive than we thought You said the networks are "choosing" not to show what happens to hecklers at Hillary or Bernie rallies. Just more of your conspiracy theory bull****. I don't see it. Are they trying to tell us there are no demonstrators? The last time we saw that was when BLM charged the stage at a Bernie rally and took over. What is happening now? Perhaps it is true that democrats are simply more disruptive and cause more trouble. We all remember the occupy thugs and in prior days the yippie riots. Breitbart has an opening for you. Brain fart Are you really trying to tell us there are no protests at a Hillary rally? If not then who are the disrupters? If the GOP protesters are so non confrontive and non violent that it is not even newsworthy, then I rest my case. No, Breitbart has openings for conspiracy believers like you. You have evidence "the networks" are choosing not to show demonstrations at Hillary/Bernie rallies? You have evidence Bernie/Hillary are threatening demonstrators and urging the crowds to take them out? That's what I am commenting upon, not your conspiracies to hide the news or whatever the point is you are not making. If I believe you I am left to believe there are no protests at hillary rallies and certainly no violent protests. Isn't that complimenting the civility of the GOP protesters? The reality is there have only been a handful of violent incidents at trump rallies and in at least one, it was a black guy throwing a major league punch at a trump guy. The reality is, Trump has been urging those who attend his rallies to beat up demonstrators and at least once he said he would pay the legal bills. That's the reality of Donald the Fascist. I haven't heard of Hillary or Bernie urging their crowds to beat up demonstrators. I am sure there are demonstrators at virtually all these events. It is Trump and Trump alone so far who has been exhorting violence on the demonstrators. And that was the point. Got it? Site? Was he maybe telling supporters to beat up anyone who initiated an assault? Or are you just continuing your spread of Krausescheie? -- It's been all over the news for days, even on Faux News. It's not my fault if, as usual, you are misinformed and uninformed. That's possibly why you'll be voting for Trump in the general, eh? |
Brown shirts for all!
On 3/16/16 2:03 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:58:34 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: On 3/16/16 12:51 PM, wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:23 -0400, Keyser Sze wrote: There is nothing in the Constitution that requires military or any other form of government service or duty, and therefore there is no requirement, period. There are plenty of social "obligations" that are not defined in the constitution. It would have been easy for me to dodge the draft by hiding in school. I had signed an "intent" letter with the CG when I was 17 but those are really not binding. It could be that I took JFKs words to heart "ask what you can do for your country". I was cognizant of what was going on in SE Asia while I was in college and immediately after, and felt a social obligation to speak out against the horrors we were perpetrating there to prop up a brutal dictatorship. I was working and obtaining a master's degree immediately after college, and while working at The Star was offered a government position that would have fulfilled a social obligation (agricultural assistance to farmers) in Vietnam, but by the time I was trained and ready, the position had been discontinued. Gosh, all that speaking out and you still volunteered to perform your 'Vietnam service', if you can be believed, which you can't. 'Agricultural assistance to farmers'? You knew more than the farmers? Or were you going to simply fertilize the Kansas wheat fields with your Krausescheie? -- As I have stated here several times, I was "recruited" to become a federal employee and participate as a publicist to build support about several agricultural "pacification programs" aimed at helping small-scale farmers in Vietnam become more productive. Thus, while you were blowing up villages, women, and children, I was involved in programs to help better feed the populace and increase the meager income of farmers. See...even back then, you were a piece of ****. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:00 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com