On 3/1/2016 11:34 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:50:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/1/16 12:38 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:36:14 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:


Obviously your reading comprehension skills are about as bad as
CalifBill's, and you will be voting for Trump in the general.



Your debate skills suck. Interesting, is how low the Democrats are turning
out for the elections. Tells us, that not many are enthused about Hillary
and Berni.

Harry debates just like Trump. It is all "you are stupid, I am awesome
and I don't need to tell you anything else".

Ironic isn't it. I still say if Trump was running as a democrat, Harry
would love him.


Your political naivete never fails to astonish. The current iteration of
Trump could never find success running for the Democratic nomination for
POTUS and, of course, I couldn't support a pig like Trump under any
circumstances.

You just said it "The current iteration of Trump".
He could just have easily came out of the box as the other Trump and
been a democrat. He has plenty of liberal history, including endorsing
Hillary and giving her money.

You seem to support the "The current iteration of Hillary" but it is
easy to point out that she has not always shared your views and her
views seem to be very fungible, depending on who's money she is trying
to get. Why won't she release transcripts of those speeches she was
giving to the banksters for six figure fees? Is it like that Romney
video that got leaked?

I really seem to be the only one here who is skeptical of the campaign
rhetoric. Maybe it is because I am willing to admit when I was
betrayed by a person I voted for. You Clintonistas are still in denial
every time they screw you and say "thank you sir, may I have another"


You are not alone with regard to Hillary. Your given reasons are much
the same that I have for never casting a vote for her. It's not because
she's a Democrat. It's because she is Hillary.

On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/1/2016 11:34 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:50:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/1/16 12:38 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:36:14 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:


Obviously your reading comprehension skills are about as bad as
CalifBill's, and you will be voting for Trump in the general.



Your debate skills suck. Interesting, is how low the Democrats are turning
out for the elections. Tells us, that not many are enthused about Hillary
and Berni.

Harry debates just like Trump. It is all "you are stupid, I am awesome
and I don't need to tell you anything else".

Ironic isn't it. I still say if Trump was running as a democrat, Harry
would love him.


Your political naivete never fails to astonish. The current iteration of
Trump could never find success running for the Democratic nomination for
POTUS and, of course, I couldn't support a pig like Trump under any
circumstances.

You just said it "The current iteration of Trump".
He could just have easily came out of the box as the other Trump and
been a democrat. He has plenty of liberal history, including endorsing
Hillary and giving her money.

You seem to support the "The current iteration of Hillary" but it is
easy to point out that she has not always shared your views and her
views seem to be very fungible, depending on who's money she is trying
to get. Why won't she release transcripts of those speeches she was
giving to the banksters for six figure fees? Is it like that Romney
video that got leaked?

I really seem to be the only one here who is skeptical of the campaign
rhetoric. Maybe it is because I am willing to admit when I was
betrayed by a person I voted for. You Clintonistas are still in denial
every time they screw you and say "thank you sir, may I have another"


You are not alone with regard to Hillary. Your given reasons are much
the same that I have for never casting a vote for her. It's not because
she's a Democrat. It's because she is Hillary.

I saw a clip of her on the morning news shrieking, "I'm still standing!" with that crazy bitch look on her face. Made me want to blow chunks.

In article ,
says...


You are not alone with regard to Hillary. Your given reasons are much
the same that I have for never casting a vote for her. It's not because
she's a Democrat. It's because she is Hillary.

I could vote for her if she didn't have that big wart on her
ass named Bill.
I won't vote for her, but I hope she wins over any Republican
that's running.
They're all backwards looking. I don't want backwards.

On 3/1/2016 2:37 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


You are not alone with regard to Hillary. Your given reasons are much
the same that I have for never casting a vote for her. It's not because
she's a Democrat. It's because she is Hillary.

I could vote for her if she didn't have that big wart on her
ass named Bill.
I won't vote for her, but I hope she wins over any Republican
that's running.
They're all backwards looking. I don't want backwards.




When it comes to the Republican choices this time around Mitt Romney
looked pretty good in retrospect. I can't believe how far to the right
the GOP has gone. Jeb seemed moderate for a while but even he had to
bow to Tea Party influence led by people like Cruz.
Trump is a great marketing pro but he's nuts otherwise.

Then again, the Dems choices ... really just Hillary and Bernie ....
have swung hard to port (notice the boating reference?) led by Bernie.
Hillary has had to adjust her positions several times to avoid losing
young voters who know nothing about what being a "moderate" is.
Socialism is on the rise and it agrees with them.

In article ,
says...

On 3/1/2016 2:37 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


You are not alone with regard to Hillary. Your given reasons are much
the same that I have for never casting a vote for her. It's not because
she's a Democrat. It's because she is Hillary.

I could vote for her if she didn't have that big wart on her
ass named Bill.
I won't vote for her, but I hope she wins over any Republican
that's running.
They're all backwards looking. I don't want backwards.




When it comes to the Republican choices this time around Mitt Romney
looked pretty good in retrospect. I can't believe how far to the right
the GOP has gone. Jeb seemed moderate for a while but even he had to
bow to Tea Party influence led by people like Cruz.
Trump is a great marketing pro but he's nuts otherwise.

Then again, the Dems choices ... really just Hillary and Bernie ....
have swung hard to port (notice the boating reference?) led by Bernie.
Hillary has had to adjust her positions several times to avoid losing
young voters who know nothing about what being a "moderate" is.
Socialism is on the rise and it agrees with them.

Hillary hasn't gone near Bernie. Nothing she has proposed is
more radical than the health care she pushed +20 years ago.
The R's are so far right reality gets distorted.
Trump is a con man. Hillary will tear him up.

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/1/2016 2:37 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


You are not alone with regard to Hillary. Your given reasons are much
the same that I have for never casting a vote for her. It's not because
she's a Democrat. It's because she is Hillary.

I could vote for her if she didn't have that big wart on her
ass named Bill.
I won't vote for her, but I hope she wins over any Republican
that's running.
They're all backwards looking. I don't want backwards.




When it comes to the Republican choices this time around Mitt Romney
looked pretty good in retrospect. I can't believe how far to the right
the GOP has gone. Jeb seemed moderate for a while but even he had to
bow to Tea Party influence led by people like Cruz.
Trump is a great marketing pro but he's nuts otherwise.

Then again, the Dems choices ... really just Hillary and Bernie ....
have swung hard to port (notice the boating reference?) led by Bernie.
Hillary has had to adjust her positions several times to avoid losing
young voters who know nothing about what being a "moderate" is.
Socialism is on the rise and it agrees with them.




I think the good thing that RM2D38ill come out with f this election, is
enough ****ed off voters, to change both the Democrats and republicans
parties.

On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:33:00 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

When it comes to the Republican choices this time around Mitt Romney
looked pretty good in retrospect. I can't believe how far to the right
the GOP has gone. Jeb seemed moderate for a while but even he had to
bow to Tea Party influence led by people like Cruz.
Trump is a great marketing pro but he's nuts otherwise.

Then again, the Dems choices ... really just Hillary and Bernie ....
have swung hard to port (notice the boating reference?) led by Bernie.
Hillary has had to adjust her positions several times to avoid losing
young voters who know nothing about what being a "moderate" is.
Socialism is on the rise and it agrees with them.


The biggest problem with Bernie is his numbers to justify his plans
are crap. The taxes he proposes will not raise nearly enough money and
he is projecting growth numbers that are totally unrealistic.
He thinks he can recreate the US right after WWII when the rest of the
world needed to be rebuilt and we were the only game in town.