Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,650
Default #46

On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:51:32 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Kimber is a non-issue for me. I can't legally buy one even if I wanted
one. *All* Kimber handguns are banned in Massachusetts.

http://fsguns.com/fsg_information.html


===

What prevents you from buying elsewhere and bringing it back home?
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default #46

On 2/28/2016 7:49 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:51:32 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Kimber is a non-issue for me. I can't legally buy one even if I wanted
one. *All* Kimber handguns are banned in Massachusetts.

http://fsguns.com/fsg_information.html

===

What prevents you from buying elsewhere and bringing it back home?



If I weren't such a law abiding citizen I could. :-)
I can't do that legally in MA. If caught with it, there goes
my gun permit and technically could be subject to fines or prosecution.

Can't order one from out of state and have it shipped and transferred
to my by a FFL either. All Kimbers are simply illegal to own here
unless they were made before 1998 and only *if* they were
always in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

I know. It's crazy. But them's the rules here.


  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default #46

7:31 PMMr. Luddite
- show quoted text -
If I weren't such a law abiding citizen I could. :-)
I can't do that legally in MA. If caught with it, there goes
my gun permit and technically could be subject to fines or prosecution.

Can't order one from out of state and have it shipped and transferred
to my by a FFL either. All Kimbers are simply illegal to own here
unless they were made before 1998 and only *if* they were
always in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

I know. It's crazy. But them's the rules here.
---

Moving out of state can cure that...
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default #46

On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:31:54 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 2/28/2016 7:49 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:51:32 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Kimber is a non-issue for me. I can't legally buy one even if I wanted
one. *All* Kimber handguns are banned in Massachusetts.

http://fsguns.com/fsg_information.html

===

What prevents you from buying elsewhere and bringing it back home?



If I weren't such a law abiding citizen I could. :-)
I can't do that legally in MA. If caught with it, there goes
my gun permit and technically could be subject to fines or prosecution.

Can't order one from out of state and have it shipped and transferred
to my by a FFL either. All Kimbers are simply illegal to own here
unless they were made before 1998 and only *if* they were
always in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

I know. It's crazy. But them's the rules here.


Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable"
gun laws.
What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol?
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default #46

On 2/29/2016 1:21 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:31:54 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 2/28/2016 7:49 PM,
wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:51:32 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Kimber is a non-issue for me. I can't legally buy one even if I wanted
one. *All* Kimber handguns are banned in Massachusetts.

http://fsguns.com/fsg_information.html

===

What prevents you from buying elsewhere and bringing it back home?



If I weren't such a law abiding citizen I could. :-)
I can't do that legally in MA. If caught with it, there goes
my gun permit and technically could be subject to fines or prosecution.

Can't order one from out of state and have it shipped and transferred
to my by a FFL either. All Kimbers are simply illegal to own here
unless they were made before 1998 and only *if* they were
always in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

I know. It's crazy. But them's the rules here.


Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable"
gun laws.
What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol?


They either don't pass the MA safety tests, meet the AG requirements or
Kimber refuses to submit any to the state for compliance testing.




  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,650
Default #46

On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:53:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable"
gun laws.
What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol?


They either don't pass the MA safety tests, meet the AG requirements or
Kimber refuses to submit any to the state for compliance testing.


===

My guess is the latter. Kimber can already sell everything they make
so why waste production assets on stupid states with stupid rules.
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default #46

On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 9:10:44 AM UTC-6, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:53:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable"
gun laws.
What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol?


They either don't pass the MA safety tests, meet the AG requirements or
Kimber refuses to submit any to the state for compliance testing.


===

My guess is the latter. Kimber can already sell everything they make
so why waste production assets on stupid states with stupid rules.


I was thinking the same thing. Kimber has high sales volume and I can't see them making a 'special' model to satisfy an angry state's resterictions just to sell a few.
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default #46

On 2/29/2016 10:17 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 9:10:44 AM UTC-6, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:53:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable"
gun laws.
What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol?


They either don't pass the MA safety tests, meet the AG requirements or
Kimber refuses to submit any to the state for compliance testing.


===

My guess is the latter. Kimber can already sell everything they make
so why waste production assets on stupid states with stupid rules.


I was thinking the same thing. Kimber has high sales volume and I can't see them making a 'special' model to satisfy an angry state's resterictions just to sell a few.



Good thing I am not a "gun nut", huh? :-)


  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2016
Posts: 211
Default #46

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/28/2016 7:49 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:51:32 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Kimber is a non-issue for me. I can't legally buy one even if I wanted
one. *All* Kimber handguns are banned in Massachusetts.

http://fsguns.com/fsg_information.html

===

What prevents you from buying elsewhere and bringing it back home?



If I weren't such a law abiding citizen I could. :-)
I can't do that legally in MA. If caught with it, there goes
my gun permit and technically could be subject to fines or prosecution.

Can't order one from out of state and have it shipped and transferred
to my by a FFL either. All Kimbers are simply illegal to own here
unless they were made before 1998 and only *if* they were
always in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

I know. It's crazy. But them's the rules here.




It is about money or some missing "feature" on the gun itself?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017