Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:51:32 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Kimber is a non-issue for me. I can't legally buy one even if I wanted one. *All* Kimber handguns are banned in Massachusetts. http://fsguns.com/fsg_information.html === What prevents you from buying elsewhere and bringing it back home? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
7:31 PMMr. Luddite
- show quoted text - If I weren't such a law abiding citizen I could. :-) I can't do that legally in MA. If caught with it, there goes my gun permit and technically could be subject to fines or prosecution. Can't order one from out of state and have it shipped and transferred to my by a FFL either. All Kimbers are simply illegal to own here unless they were made before 1998 and only *if* they were always in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. I know. It's crazy. But them's the rules here. --- Moving out of state can cure that... |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:31:54 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 2/28/2016 7:49 PM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:51:32 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Kimber is a non-issue for me. I can't legally buy one even if I wanted one. *All* Kimber handguns are banned in Massachusetts. http://fsguns.com/fsg_information.html === What prevents you from buying elsewhere and bringing it back home? If I weren't such a law abiding citizen I could. :-) I can't do that legally in MA. If caught with it, there goes my gun permit and technically could be subject to fines or prosecution. Can't order one from out of state and have it shipped and transferred to my by a FFL either. All Kimbers are simply illegal to own here unless they were made before 1998 and only *if* they were always in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. I know. It's crazy. But them's the rules here. Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable" gun laws. What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol? |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/29/2016 1:21 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:31:54 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/28/2016 7:49 PM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:51:32 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Kimber is a non-issue for me. I can't legally buy one even if I wanted one. *All* Kimber handguns are banned in Massachusetts. http://fsguns.com/fsg_information.html === What prevents you from buying elsewhere and bringing it back home? If I weren't such a law abiding citizen I could. :-) I can't do that legally in MA. If caught with it, there goes my gun permit and technically could be subject to fines or prosecution. Can't order one from out of state and have it shipped and transferred to my by a FFL either. All Kimbers are simply illegal to own here unless they were made before 1998 and only *if* they were always in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. I know. It's crazy. But them's the rules here. Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable" gun laws. What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol? They either don't pass the MA safety tests, meet the AG requirements or Kimber refuses to submit any to the state for compliance testing. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:53:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable" gun laws. What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol? They either don't pass the MA safety tests, meet the AG requirements or Kimber refuses to submit any to the state for compliance testing. === My guess is the latter. Kimber can already sell everything they make so why waste production assets on stupid states with stupid rules. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 9:10:44 AM UTC-6, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:53:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable" gun laws. What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol? They either don't pass the MA safety tests, meet the AG requirements or Kimber refuses to submit any to the state for compliance testing. === My guess is the latter. Kimber can already sell everything they make so why waste production assets on stupid states with stupid rules. I was thinking the same thing. Kimber has high sales volume and I can't see them making a 'special' model to satisfy an angry state's resterictions just to sell a few. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/29/2016 10:17 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 9:10:44 AM UTC-6, wrote: On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:53:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Sort of flies in the face of claims that they only want "reasonable" gun laws. What makes a Kimber any worse than any other .45 pistol? They either don't pass the MA safety tests, meet the AG requirements or Kimber refuses to submit any to the state for compliance testing. === My guess is the latter. Kimber can already sell everything they make so why waste production assets on stupid states with stupid rules. I was thinking the same thing. Kimber has high sales volume and I can't see them making a 'special' model to satisfy an angry state's resterictions just to sell a few. Good thing I am not a "gun nut", huh? :-) |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/28/2016 7:49 PM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:51:32 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Kimber is a non-issue for me. I can't legally buy one even if I wanted one. *All* Kimber handguns are banned in Massachusetts. http://fsguns.com/fsg_information.html === What prevents you from buying elsewhere and bringing it back home? If I weren't such a law abiding citizen I could. :-) I can't do that legally in MA. If caught with it, there goes my gun permit and technically could be subject to fines or prosecution. Can't order one from out of state and have it shipped and transferred to my by a FFL either. All Kimbers are simply illegal to own here unless they were made before 1998 and only *if* they were always in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. I know. It's crazy. But them's the rules here. It is about money or some missing "feature" on the gun itself? |