| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Harry could have written this
First, we can't ever lose sight of the strategic policy guiding our
work: defeat the extreme right and GOP, its oligarchic backers, defend the presidency and break the GOP grip on Congress, statehouses and governorships. In addition we must work at ensuring attempts to appointment extremist, pro-segregationist justices to the U.S. Supreme Court are blocked. Whatever the outcome in the Democratic primaries we will contribute to building unity of a broad left-center, multi-class, multi-racial, male-female, multi-generational alliance of forces for the general election. Building such a multi-class alliance that includes the Democratic Party establishment or corporate wing will be a greater challenge if Sanders is nominated, but not impossible. We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election mobilization. Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large "speaking" fees from Wall Street. But we know this already. **************** It comes from the American Communist Party http://www.cpusa.org/taking-a-sober-...2016-election/ Nuff said? |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Harry could have written this
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:02:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 2/12/16 12:43 PM, wrote: First, we can't ever lose sight of the strategic policy guiding our work: defeat the extreme right and GOP, its oligarchic backers, defend the presidency and break the GOP grip on Congress, statehouses and governorships. Sounds like a good idea... In addition we must work at ensuring attempts to appointment extremist, pro-segregationist justices to the U.S. Supreme Court are blocked. Absolutely... Whatever the outcome in the Democratic primaries we will contribute to building unity of a broad left-center, multi-class, multi-racial, male-female, multi-generational alliance of forces for the general election. Bring everyone together...great... Building such a multi-class alliance that includes the Democratic Party establishment or corporate wing will be a greater challenge if Sanders is nominated, but not impossible. Probably true... We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election mobilization. Indeed, the enemy is the extreme right... Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large "speaking" fees from Wall Street. But we know this already. Correct... **************** It comes from the American Communist Party http://www.cpusa.org/taking-a-sober-...2016-election/ Nuff said? Yeah, those Commies seem to know what is at stake in 2016... Progress versus regression... From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs -Marx OK I got it. It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his ads. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Harry could have written this
On 2/12/2016 1:17 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:02:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/12/16 12:43 PM, wrote: First, we can't ever lose sight of the strategic policy guiding our work: defeat the extreme right and GOP, its oligarchic backers, defend the presidency and break the GOP grip on Congress, statehouses and governorships. Sounds like a good idea... In addition we must work at ensuring attempts to appointment extremist, pro-segregationist justices to the U.S. Supreme Court are blocked. Absolutely... Whatever the outcome in the Democratic primaries we will contribute to building unity of a broad left-center, multi-class, multi-racial, male-female, multi-generational alliance of forces for the general election. Bring everyone together...great... Building such a multi-class alliance that includes the Democratic Party establishment or corporate wing will be a greater challenge if Sanders is nominated, but not impossible. Probably true... We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election mobilization. Indeed, the enemy is the extreme right... Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large "speaking" fees from Wall Street. But we know this already. Correct... **************** It comes from the American Communist Party http://www.cpusa.org/taking-a-sober-...2016-election/ Nuff said? Yeah, those Commies seem to know what is at stake in 2016... Progress versus regression... From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs -Marx OK I got it. It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his ads. Its sad that the Democrats have a choice between a criminal and a Communist this election cycle. Of course, the Republicans currently have known Democrat as their front-runner... |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Harry could have written this
On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:02:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/12/16 12:43 PM, wrote: First, we can't ever lose sight of the strategic policy guiding our work: defeat the extreme right and GOP, its oligarchic backers, defend the presidency and break the GOP grip on Congress, statehouses and governorships. Sounds like a good idea... In addition we must work at ensuring attempts to appointment extremist, pro-segregationist justices to the U.S. Supreme Court are blocked. Absolutely... Whatever the outcome in the Democratic primaries we will contribute to building unity of a broad left-center, multi-class, multi-racial, male-female, multi-generational alliance of forces for the general election. Bring everyone together...great... Building such a multi-class alliance that includes the Democratic Party establishment or corporate wing will be a greater challenge if Sanders is nominated, but not impossible. Probably true... We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election mobilization. Indeed, the enemy is the extreme right... Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large "speaking" fees from Wall Street. But we know this already. Correct... **************** It comes from the American Communist Party http://www.cpusa.org/taking-a-sober-...2016-election/ Nuff said? Yeah, those Commies seem to know what is at stake in 2016... Progress versus regression... From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs -Marx OK I got it. It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his ads. What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive? Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a harmonious way to work for a better society? |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Harry could have written this
On 2/12/2016 1:42 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote: On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:02:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/12/16 12:43 PM, wrote: First, we can't ever lose sight of the strategic policy guiding our work: defeat the extreme right and GOP, its oligarchic backers, defend the presidency and break the GOP grip on Congress, statehouses and governorships. Sounds like a good idea... In addition we must work at ensuring attempts to appointment extremist, pro-segregationist justices to the U.S. Supreme Court are blocked. Absolutely... Whatever the outcome in the Democratic primaries we will contribute to building unity of a broad left-center, multi-class, multi-racial, male-female, multi-generational alliance of forces for the general election. Bring everyone together...great... Building such a multi-class alliance that includes the Democratic Party establishment or corporate wing will be a greater challenge if Sanders is nominated, but not impossible. Probably true... We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election mobilization. Indeed, the enemy is the extreme right... Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large "speaking" fees from Wall Street. But we know this already. Correct... **************** It comes from the American Communist Party http://www.cpusa.org/taking-a-sober-...2016-election/ Nuff said? Yeah, those Commies seem to know what is at stake in 2016... Progress versus regression... From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs -Marx OK I got it. It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his ads. What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive? Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a harmonious way to work for a better society? The problem with "bringing people together in a harmonious way" is that it usually leads to one person (or group) deciding what's "best" for everybody, and then vilifying anybody who disagrees. What if the person who comes to power to do this task decides that the only way to have a harmonious group is to expel anybody who doesn't have blue eyes and blonde hair? Oh, wait... that sounds familiar... |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Harry could have written this
On 2/12/16 2:57 PM, Ryan P. wrote:
On 2/12/2016 1:42 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote: On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:02:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/12/16 12:43 PM, wrote: First, we can't ever lose sight of the strategic policy guiding our work: defeat the extreme right and GOP, its oligarchic backers, defend the presidency and break the GOP grip on Congress, statehouses and governorships. Sounds like a good idea... In addition we must work at ensuring attempts to appointment extremist, pro-segregationist justices to the U.S. Supreme Court are blocked. Absolutely... Whatever the outcome in the Democratic primaries we will contribute to building unity of a broad left-center, multi-class, multi-racial, male-female, multi-generational alliance of forces for the general election. Bring everyone together...great... Building such a multi-class alliance that includes the Democratic Party establishment or corporate wing will be a greater challenge if Sanders is nominated, but not impossible. Probably true... We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election mobilization. Indeed, the enemy is the extreme right... Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large "speaking" fees from Wall Street. But we know this already. Correct... **************** It comes from the American Communist Party http://www.cpusa.org/taking-a-sober-...2016-election/ Nuff said? Yeah, those Commies seem to know what is at stake in 2016... Progress versus regression... From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs -Marx OK I got it. It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his ads. What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive? Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a harmonious way to work for a better society? The problem with "bringing people together in a harmonious way" is that it usually leads to one person (or group) deciding what's "best" for everybody, and then vilifying anybody who disagrees. What if the person who comes to power to do this task decides that the only way to have a harmonious group is to expel anybody who doesn't have blue eyes and blonde hair? Oh, wait... that sounds familiar... Yeah...Donald Trump...the leading GOP candidate. Glad you got it. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Harry could have written this
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:42:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs -Marx OK I got it. It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his ads. What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive? Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a harmonious way to work for a better society? I was only pointing at the source. That makes it pretty hard to distinguish democrats from communists... whatever that means. Actually Khrushchev predicted this after the democrats took over the white house in the 60s. He said "You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism." he also said "I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own working class will bury you." My favorite is "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river" |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Harry could have written this
On 2/12/16 3:28 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:42:54 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs -Marx OK I got it. It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his ads. What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive? Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a harmonious way to work for a better society? I was only pointing at the source. That makes it pretty hard to distinguish democrats from communists... whatever that means. Actually Khrushchev predicted this after the democrats took over the white house in the 60s. He said "You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism." he also said "I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own working class will bury you." My favorite is "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river" I'm not sure what you are advocating, and I'm not sure you know. The middle class is disappearing in this country, and what wealth remains is being sucked up by the wealthy. That will lead to a violent revolution, for sure. Is that what you want? |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Harry could have written this
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/12/16 3:28 PM, wrote: On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:42:54 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs -Marx OK I got it. It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his ads. What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive? Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a harmonious way to work for a better society? I was only pointing at the source. That makes it pretty hard to distinguish democrats from communists... whatever that means. Actually Khrushchev predicted this after the democrats took over the white house in the 60s. He said "You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism." he also said "I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own working class will bury you." My favorite is "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river" I'm not sure what you are advocating, and I'm not sure you know. The middle class is disappearing in this country, and what wealth remains is being sucked up by the wealthy. That will lead to a violent revolution, for sure. Is that what you want? And the Clintonistas have been fundamentals in enabling the 1% |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Well written comment on the OWS crowd. | General | |||
| It is written | General | |||
| A song written for Plume | General | |||
| Your Name written with Nautical Flags | General | |||
| OT - Online sharing of self written texts? | General | |||
Linear Mode
