On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:02:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/16 12:43 PM, wrote:
First, we can't ever lose sight of the strategic policy guiding our
work: defeat the extreme right and GOP, its oligarchic backers, defend
the presidency and break the GOP grip on Congress, statehouses and
governorships.

Sounds like a good idea...



In addition we must work at ensuring attempts to appointment
extremist, pro-segregationist justices to the U.S. Supreme Court are
blocked.

Absolutely...

Whatever the outcome in the Democratic primaries we will contribute to
building unity of a broad left-center, multi-class, multi-racial,
male-female, multi-generational alliance of forces for the general
election.

Bring everyone together...great...



Building such a multi-class alliance that includes the Democratic
Party establishment or corporate wing will be a greater challenge if
Sanders is nominated, but not impossible.

Probably true...


We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the
broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that
no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election
mobilization.


Indeed, the enemy is the extreme right...


Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the
Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including
her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so
obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large "speaking" fees
from Wall Street. But we know this already.

Correct...


****************

It comes from the American Communist Party

http://www.cpusa.org/taking-a-sober-...2016-election/

Nuff said?


Yeah, those Commies seem to know what is at stake in 2016...

Progress versus regression...

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
-Marx

OK I got it.

It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen
grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should
embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his
ads.



What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx
statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive?
Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off
the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a
harmonious way to work for a better society?