Harry could have written this
 

On 2/12/2016 2:36 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
{snip}

I'm not sure what you are advocating, and I'm not sure you know. The
middle class is disappearing in this country, and what wealth remains is
being sucked up by the wealthy. That will lead to a violent revolution,
for sure. Is that what you want?

There is plenty of wealth in this country. Problem is the SMART
wealthy people are hoarding it because the Government taxes the hell out
of money whenever it moves. The smart middle class are doing the same.

As a business owner, why should I invest millions of dollars to expand
production (and therefor employees) when the Government is going to take
40% of my money?

With Government over reach what it is, as Democrats take more rights
away from the taxpaying public, you're going to see more instances of
armed resistance. Sadly, it will the rural people who do this and
portrayed as bumpkins and rednecks. Meanwhile, the urban poor who are
handed everything by the government won't understand what the "rednecks"
have a problem with.

As the saying goes... I don't need a gun with a 30 round magazine for
hunting, but the 2nd Amendment wasn't written in case the deer turn
against us.

For the record, in no way do I advocate a violent revolution.

Harry could have written this
 

On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 3:36:03 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/12/16 3:28 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:42:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote:

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
-Marx

OK I got it.

It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen
grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should
embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his
ads.



What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx
statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive?
Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off
the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a
harmonious way to work for a better society?

I was only pointing at the source. That makes it pretty hard to
distinguish democrats from communists... whatever that means.

Actually Khrushchev predicted this after the democrats took over the
white house in the 60s. He said "You Americans are so gullible. No,
you won't accept communism outright, but we'll keep feeding you small
doses of socialism until you'll finally wake up and find you already
have communism."

he also said "I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble
with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own
working class will bury you."

My favorite is "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to
build a bridge even where there is no river"


I'm not sure what you are advocating, and I'm not sure you know. The
middle class is disappearing in this country, and what wealth remains is
being sucked up by the wealthy. That will lead to a violent revolution,
for sure. Is that what you want?

Why all the hate-mongering and fear-spreading?

Harry could have written this
 

On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 3:29:21 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:42:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote:

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
-Marx

OK I got it.

It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen
grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should
embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his
ads.



What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx
statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive?
Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off
the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a
harmonious way to work for a better society?

I was only pointing at the source. That makes it pretty hard to
distinguish democrats from communists... whatever that means.

Actually Khrushchev predicted this after the democrats took over the
white house in the 60s. He said "You Americans are so gullible. No,
you won't accept communism outright, but we'll keep feeding you small
doses of socialism until you'll finally wake up and find you already
have communism."

he also said "I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble
with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own
working class will bury you."

My favorite is "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to
build a bridge even where there is no river"

Love it. Harry's defending the democrats for being closet communists. Delicious, as they say. :)

Harry could have written this
 

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:36:00 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/12/16 3:28 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:42:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote:

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
-Marx

OK I got it.

It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen
grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should
embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his
ads.



What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx
statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive?
Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off
the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a
harmonious way to work for a better society?

I was only pointing at the source. That makes it pretty hard to
distinguish democrats from communists... whatever that means.

Actually Khrushchev predicted this after the democrats took over the
white house in the 60s. He said "You Americans are so gullible. No,
you won’t accept communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small
doses of socialism until you’ll finally wake up and find you already
have communism."

he also said "I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble
with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own
working class will bury you."

My favorite is "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to
build a bridge even where there is no river"


I'm not sure what you are advocating, and I'm not sure you know. The
middle class is disappearing in this country, and what wealth remains is
being sucked up by the wealthy. That will lead to a violent revolution,
for sure. Is that what you want?

And none of the wealthy are Democrats, eh Krause?

More Krausescheiße.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, and narcissists...not guns!

Harry could have written this
 

On 2/12/2016 2:42 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:02:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/16 12:43 PM, wrote:
First, we can't ever lose sight of the strategic policy guiding our
work: defeat the extreme right and GOP, its oligarchic backers, defend
the presidency and break the GOP grip on Congress, statehouses and
governorships.

Sounds like a good idea...



In addition we must work at ensuring attempts to appointment
extremist, pro-segregationist justices to the U.S. Supreme Court are
blocked.

Absolutely...

Whatever the outcome in the Democratic primaries we will contribute to
building unity of a broad left-center, multi-class, multi-racial,
male-female, multi-generational alliance of forces for the general
election.

Bring everyone together...great...



Building such a multi-class alliance that includes the Democratic
Party establishment or corporate wing will be a greater challenge if
Sanders is nominated, but not impossible.

Probably true...


We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the
broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that
no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election
mobilization.


Indeed, the enemy is the extreme right...


Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the
Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including
her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so
obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large "speaking" fees
from Wall Street. But we know this already.

Correct...


****************

It comes from the American Communist Party

http://www.cpusa.org/taking-a-sober-...2016-election/

Nuff said?


Yeah, those Commies seem to know what is at stake in 2016...

Progress versus regression...

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
-Marx

OK I got it.

It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen
grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should
embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his
ads.



What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx
statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive?
Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off
the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a
harmonious way to work for a better society?


Works for me as long as the manner in which these lofty goals are
accomplished does not infringe upon:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Harry could have written this
 

Its Me wrote:
On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 3:36:03 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/12/16 3:28 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:42:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote:

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
-Marx

OK I got it.

It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen
grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should
embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his
ads.



What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx
statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive?
Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off
the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a
harmonious way to work for a better society?

I was only pointing at the source. That makes it pretty hard to
distinguish democrats from communists... whatever that means.

Actually Khrushchev predicted this after the democrats took over the
white house in the 60s. He said "You Americans are so gullible. No,
you won't accept communism outright, but we'll keep feeding you small
doses of socialism until you'll finally wake up and find you already
have communism."

he also said "I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble
with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own
working class will bury you."

My favorite is "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to
build a bridge even where there is no river"


I'm not sure what you are advocating, and I'm not sure you know. The
middle class is disappearing in this country, and what wealth remains is
being sucked up by the wealthy. That will lead to a violent revolution,
for sure. Is that what you want?

Why all the hate-mongering and fear-spreading?


His fears he will lose his government dole.

Harry could have written this
 

On 2/12/16 6:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Its Me wrote:
On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 3:36:03 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/12/16 3:28 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:42:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote:

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
-Marx

OK I got it.

It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen
grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should
embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his
ads.



What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx
statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive?
Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off
the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a
harmonious way to work for a better society?

I was only pointing at the source. That makes it pretty hard to
distinguish democrats from communists... whatever that means.

Actually Khrushchev predicted this after the democrats took over the
white house in the 60s. He said "You Americans are so gullible. No,
you won't accept communism outright, but we'll keep feeding you small
doses of socialism until you'll finally wake up and find you already
have communism."

he also said "I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble
with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own
working class will bury you."

My favorite is "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to
build a bridge even where there is no river"


I'm not sure what you are advocating, and I'm not sure you know. The
middle class is disappearing in this country, and what wealth remains is
being sucked up by the wealthy. That will lead to a violent revolution,
for sure. Is that what you want?

Why all the hate-mongering and fear-spreading?


His fears he will lose his government dole.


Uh...*my* government dole? Aren't you the one receiving social security
and medicare? I'm still in the private world.

Harry could have written this
 

On 2/12/16 5:23 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:36:00 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/12/16 3:28 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:42:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote:

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
-Marx

OK I got it.

It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen
grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should
embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his
ads.



What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx
statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive?
Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off
the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a
harmonious way to work for a better society?

I was only pointing at the source. That makes it pretty hard to
distinguish democrats from communists... whatever that means.

Actually Khrushchev predicted this after the democrats took over the
white house in the 60s. He said "You Americans are so gullible. No,
you won’t accept communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small
doses of socialism until you’ll finally wake up and find you already
have communism."

he also said "I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble
with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own
working class will bury you."

My favorite is "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to
build a bridge even where there is no river"


I'm not sure what you are advocating, and I'm not sure you know. The
middle class is disappearing in this country, and what wealth remains is
being sucked up by the wealthy. That will lead to a violent revolution,
for sure. Is that what you want?

And none of the wealthy are Democrats, eh Krause?

More Krausescheiße.
--


More and more, Johnny Ku Klux, your posts are TDC - totally devoid of
content. Will your wife be shipping you off to the "retirement home"
soon so she can sell your toys, your guns, your golf clubs, and your
motorbike, and move to a nice condo where it is warm?

Harry could have written this
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/12/16 6:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Its Me wrote:
On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 3:36:03 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/12/16 3:28 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:42:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote:

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
-Marx

OK I got it.

It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen
grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should
embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his
ads.



What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx
statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive?
Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off
the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a
harmonious way to work for a better society?

I was only pointing at the source. That makes it pretty hard to
distinguish democrats from communists... whatever that means.

Actually Khrushchev predicted this after the democrats took over the
white house in the 60s. He said "You Americans are so gullible. No,
you won't accept communism outright, but we'll keep feeding you small
doses of socialism until you'll finally wake up and find you already
have communism."

he also said "I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble
with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own
working class will bury you."

My favorite is "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to
build a bridge even where there is no river"


I'm not sure what you are advocating, and I'm not sure you know. The
middle class is disappearing in this country, and what wealth remains is
being sucked up by the wealthy. That will lead to a violent revolution,
for sure. Is that what you want?

Why all the hate-mongering and fear-spreading?


His fears he will lose his government dole.


Uh...*my* government dole? Aren't you the one receiving social security
and medicare? I'm still in the private world.


Yup, and I paid in to SS for 50 years, and pay taxes on 80% of my payment.
Social Security is not a welfare program, or dole. You should have taken a
couple economic courses during your so called higher level education. May
have helped you avoid excess debt.

Harry could have written this
 

On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 6:33:40 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/12/16 6:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Its Me wrote:
On Friday, February 12, 2016 at 3:36:03 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/12/16 3:28 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:42:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/16 2:17 PM, wrote:

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
-Marx

OK I got it.

It is interesting that the Democrat talking points look like a screen
grab from the communist party web site so I suppose Bernie should
embrace the communist appelation and put the Hammer and Sickle on his
ads.



What you posted and what I commented on did not include the Marx
statement. Just what is it in your original post do you find offensive?
Are you, for example, opposed to the idea of keeping segregationists off
the Supreme Court? Are you against bringing people together in a
harmonious way to work for a better society?

I was only pointing at the source. That makes it pretty hard to
distinguish democrats from communists... whatever that means.

Actually Khrushchev predicted this after the democrats took over the
white house in the 60s. He said "You Americans are so gullible. No,
you won't accept communism outright, but we'll keep feeding you small
doses of socialism until you'll finally wake up and find you already
have communism."

he also said "I once said, 'We will bury you,' and I got into trouble
with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own
working class will bury you."

My favorite is "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to
build a bridge even where there is no river"


I'm not sure what you are advocating, and I'm not sure you know. The
middle class is disappearing in this country, and what wealth remains is
being sucked up by the wealthy. That will lead to a violent revolution,
for sure. Is that what you want?

Why all the hate-mongering and fear-spreading?


His fears he will lose his government dole.


Uh...*my* government dole? Aren't you the one receiving social security
and medicare? I'm still in the private world.

I guess being financed by Karen qualifies as being "in the private world". LOL