John H.
- show quoted text -
Snip usual crap...

"Again, you seem to be evading the question. Why would you 'love' to see the property
of another destroyed?"

Think about that real hard, Johnny.
Answer...because it would be for the general good of the average 'merican.
For example...let's say you have a room full of KKK symbols, books, artifacts etc.
I would love to see you have to destroy all for the public good.
Get it?

On 2/2/2016 1:19 PM, True North wrote:
John H.
- show quoted text -
Snip usual crap...

"Again, you seem to be evading the question. Why would you 'love' to see the property
of another destroyed?"

Think about that real hard, Johnny.
Answer...because it would be for the general good of the average 'merican.
For example...let's say you have a room full of KKK symbols, books, artifacts etc.
I would love to see you have to destroy all for the public good.
Get it?


I know you don't have free speech in Canada, but the 1st amendment
guarantees ours.

On Tuesday, February 2, 2016 at 1:19:41 PM UTC-5, True North wrote:
John H.
- show quoted text -
Snip usual crap...

"Again, you seem to be evading the question. Why would you 'love' to see the property
of another destroyed?"

Think about that real hard, Johnny.
Answer...because it would be for the general good of the average 'merican.
For example...let's say you have a room full of KKK symbols, books, artifacts etc.
I would love to see you have to destroy all for the public good.
Get it?

That has to be one of the dumbest things I've ever read on usenet. And considering the source, I'm not surprised.

True North wrote:
John H.
- show quoted text -
Snip usual crap...

"Again, you seem to be evading the question. Why would you 'love' to see the property
of another destroyed?"

Think about that real hard, Johnny.
Answer...because it would be for the general good of the average 'merican.
For example...let's say you have a room full of KKK symbols, books, artifacts etc.
I would love to see you have to destroy all for the public good.
Get it?


We have freedom of speech here.

Y'all seem to want to bend over backwards to protect hate speech.
No wonder ' merica is so screwed up and getting worse. Sure hope it doesn't spill over the border when y'all implode.

On 2/2/16 3:01 PM, True North wrote:
Y'all seem to want to bend over backwards to protect hate speech.
No wonder ' merica is so screwed up and getting worse. Sure hope it doesn't spill over the border when y'all implode.


Most of the righties here protect their hate speech by posting
"anonymously." Just ask FlaJim, Alex, and the rest of the right-wing
assholes.

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:01:05 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

Y'all seem to want to bend over backwards to protect hate speech.
No wonder ' merica is so screwed up and getting worse. Sure hope it doesn't spill over the border when y'all implode.

Freedom of speech is EXACTLY protecting the speech you hate.

As soon as you let the government decide which speech is worthy of
protection and which is not, you are on your way to a dictatorship.

On 2/2/16 3:28 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:01:05 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

Y'all seem to want to bend over backwards to protect hate speech.
No wonder ' merica is so screwed up and getting worse. Sure hope it doesn't spill over the border when y'all implode.

Freedom of speech is EXACTLY protecting the speech you hate.

As soon as you let the government decide which speech is worthy of
protection and which is not, you are on your way to a dictatorship.

Bull****.

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:23:08 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/2/16 3:01 PM, True North wrote:
Y'all seem to want to bend over backwards to protect hate speech.
No wonder ' merica is so screwed up and getting worse. Sure hope it doesn't spill over the border when y'all implode.


Most of the righties here protect their hate speech by posting
"anonymously." Just ask FlaJim, Alex, and the rest of the right-wing
assholes.

Says a guy who posts under the pseudonym of a homicidal maniac.

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:30:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/2/16 3:28 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:01:05 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

Y'all seem to want to bend over backwards to protect hate speech.
No wonder ' merica is so screwed up and getting worse. Sure hope it doesn't spill over the border when y'all implode.

Freedom of speech is EXACTLY protecting the speech you hate.

As soon as you let the government decide which speech is worthy of
protection and which is not, you are on your way to a dictatorship.

Bull****.

I bet you were not saying that when guys like me were still defending
the rights of the protestors in the 60s, right up until they started
blowing stuff up.
I disagreed with what they said but I understood they still had the
right to say it.

It seems that the left is actually the least tolerant of anyone else's
views. You only have to look at a college campus now to see that.