Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Tell a lie often enough

.... and it becomes fact

Rachel Mad Cow did a show on MSNBC tonight and a lot of it was
perfectly true. Lead is there, it is bad, it came from the pipes and
the pipes should have been replaced 50 years ago when Flint was
rolling in auto money.
It is true that they were damaged because the Flint water district did
not add the SAME corrosion inhibitors that Detroit uses.

Where the lies start is when they start laying blame.
#1 it was not the state that decided to switch from Detroit water to
the Flint River
The fact is the Detroit water district terminated their contract with
Flint in retaliation for Genesee County building a competing pipeline.
#2 It was not the state that decided to go with the Genesee county
water system, (something they completely ignored) it was the city
council and Rachel admitted it was a 7-1 vote.

The unanswered question was, WHO decided not to add the corrosion
inhibitor that Detroit uses? It certainly wasn't money since that
would only be about $100 a day for the whole city. That pretty much
had to be the Flint water district manager or his staff.
Why wasn't there anyone in the water district who knew that water
without the corrosion inhibitor would cause this problem?

I have posted the water reports from Flint and Detroit here already
and there is not any significant difference in pH or even the salt
they are talking about (~4ppm)

They did say there were failures at every level of government, right
before they said it was all the governor's fault. I bet if Grandholm
was still there they would have found a way to blame it on Bush.

I assume they now want the federal government to spend the billions to
replace all of that pipe. Are we going to do it in every other city
that used lead pipe?
I guess a $1000 surtax on everyone's 1040 would cover it.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default Tell a lie often enough

On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 02:28:29 -0500, wrote:

... and it becomes fact

Rachel Mad Cow did a show on MSNBC tonight and a lot of it was
perfectly true. Lead is there, it is bad, it came from the pipes and
the pipes should have been replaced 50 years ago when Flint was
rolling in auto money.
It is true that they were damaged because the Flint water district did
not add the SAME corrosion inhibitors that Detroit uses.

Where the lies start is when they start laying blame.
#1 it was not the state that decided to switch from Detroit water to
the Flint River
The fact is the Detroit water district terminated their contract with
Flint in retaliation for Genesee County building a competing pipeline.
#2 It was not the state that decided to go with the Genesee county
water system, (something they completely ignored) it was the city
council and Rachel admitted it was a 7-1 vote.

The unanswered question was, WHO decided not to add the corrosion
inhibitor that Detroit uses? It certainly wasn't money since that
would only be about $100 a day for the whole city. That pretty much
had to be the Flint water district manager or his staff.
Why wasn't there anyone in the water district who knew that water
without the corrosion inhibitor would cause this problem?

I have posted the water reports from Flint and Detroit here already
and there is not any significant difference in pH or even the salt
they are talking about (~4ppm)

They did say there were failures at every level of government, right
before they said it was all the governor's fault. I bet if Grandholm
was still there they would have found a way to blame it on Bush.

I assume they now want the federal government to spend the billions to
replace all of that pipe. Are we going to do it in every other city
that used lead pipe?
I guess a $1000 surtax on everyone's 1040 would cover it.


I'll pretend to be Harry...

"I don't care. It's the Republican Governor's fault. He probably put in the lead
pipes to begin with, and was using the inhibitor money to pay off the Flint water
department folks to keep their mouths shut."
--

Ban idiots, not guns!
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default Tell a lie often enough

On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 4:34:31 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 02:28:29 -0500, wrote:

... and it becomes fact

Rachel Mad Cow did a show on MSNBC tonight and a lot of it was
perfectly true. Lead is there, it is bad, it came from the pipes and
the pipes should have been replaced 50 years ago when Flint was
rolling in auto money.
It is true that they were damaged because the Flint water district did
not add the SAME corrosion inhibitors that Detroit uses.

Where the lies start is when they start laying blame.
#1 it was not the state that decided to switch from Detroit water to
the Flint River
The fact is the Detroit water district terminated their contract with
Flint in retaliation for Genesee County building a competing pipeline.
#2 It was not the state that decided to go with the Genesee county
water system, (something they completely ignored) it was the city
council and Rachel admitted it was a 7-1 vote.

The unanswered question was, WHO decided not to add the corrosion
inhibitor that Detroit uses? It certainly wasn't money since that
would only be about $100 a day for the whole city. That pretty much
had to be the Flint water district manager or his staff.
Why wasn't there anyone in the water district who knew that water
without the corrosion inhibitor would cause this problem?

I have posted the water reports from Flint and Detroit here already
and there is not any significant difference in pH or even the salt
they are talking about (~4ppm)

They did say there were failures at every level of government, right
before they said it was all the governor's fault. I bet if Grandholm
was still there they would have found a way to blame it on Bush.

I assume they now want the federal government to spend the billions to
replace all of that pipe. Are we going to do it in every other city
that used lead pipe?
I guess a $1000 surtax on everyone's 1040 would cover it.


I'll pretend to be Harry...

"I don't care. It's the Republican Governor's fault. He probably put in the lead
pipes to begin with, and was using the inhibitor money to pay off the Flint water
department folks to keep their mouths shut."
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Really? I thought he said the R governor did it so it would be easier to kill off blacks.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default Tell a lie often enough

On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 05:11:40 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 4:34:31 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 02:28:29 -0500, wrote:

... and it becomes fact

Rachel Mad Cow did a show on MSNBC tonight and a lot of it was
perfectly true. Lead is there, it is bad, it came from the pipes and
the pipes should have been replaced 50 years ago when Flint was
rolling in auto money.
It is true that they were damaged because the Flint water district did
not add the SAME corrosion inhibitors that Detroit uses.

Where the lies start is when they start laying blame.
#1 it was not the state that decided to switch from Detroit water to
the Flint River
The fact is the Detroit water district terminated their contract with
Flint in retaliation for Genesee County building a competing pipeline.
#2 It was not the state that decided to go with the Genesee county
water system, (something they completely ignored) it was the city
council and Rachel admitted it was a 7-1 vote.

The unanswered question was, WHO decided not to add the corrosion
inhibitor that Detroit uses? It certainly wasn't money since that
would only be about $100 a day for the whole city. That pretty much
had to be the Flint water district manager or his staff.
Why wasn't there anyone in the water district who knew that water
without the corrosion inhibitor would cause this problem?

I have posted the water reports from Flint and Detroit here already
and there is not any significant difference in pH or even the salt
they are talking about (~4ppm)

They did say there were failures at every level of government, right
before they said it was all the governor's fault. I bet if Grandholm
was still there they would have found a way to blame it on Bush.

I assume they now want the federal government to spend the billions to
replace all of that pipe. Are we going to do it in every other city
that used lead pipe?
I guess a $1000 surtax on everyone's 1040 would cover it.


I'll pretend to be Harry...

"I don't care. It's the Republican Governor's fault. He probably put in the lead
pipes to begin with, and was using the inhibitor money to pay off the Flint water
department folks to keep their mouths shut."
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Really? I thought he said the R governor did it so it would be easier to kill off blacks.


Whoopsiedaisy...should have said:

"I don't care. It's the Republican Governor's fault. He probably put in the lead
pipes to begin with, and was using the inhibitor money to pay off the Flint water
department folks to keep their mouths shut about killing off blacks."

Thanks for the correction.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,244
Default Tell a lie often enough

On 1/28/2016 2:28 AM, wrote:
.... and it becomes fact

Rachel Mad Cow did a show on MSNBC tonight and a lot of it was
perfectly true. Lead is there, it is bad, it came from the pipes and
the pipes should have been replaced 50 years ago when Flint was
rolling in auto money.
It is true that they were damaged because the Flint water district did
not add the SAME corrosion inhibitors that Detroit uses.

Where the lies start is when they start laying blame.
#1 it was not the state that decided to switch from Detroit water to
the Flint River
The fact is the Detroit water district terminated their contract with
Flint in retaliation for Genesee County building a competing pipeline.
#2 It was not the state that decided to go with the Genesee county
water system, (something they completely ignored) it was the city
council and Rachel admitted it was a 7-1 vote.

The unanswered question was, WHO decided not to add the corrosion
inhibitor that Detroit uses? It certainly wasn't money since that
would only be about $100 a day for the whole city. That pretty much
had to be the Flint water district manager or his staff.
Why wasn't there anyone in the water district who knew that water
without the corrosion inhibitor would cause this problem?

I have posted the water reports from Flint and Detroit here already
and there is not any significant difference in pH or even the salt
they are talking about (~4ppm)

They did say there were failures at every level of government, right
before they said it was all the governor's fault. I bet if Grandholm
was still there they would have found a way to blame it on Bush.

I assume they now want the federal government to spend the billions to
replace all of that pipe. Are we going to do it in every other city
that used lead pipe?
I guess a $1000 surtax on everyone's 1040 would cover it.


I wonder what that corrosion inhibitor does to human pipes.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,244
Default Tell a lie often enough

On 1/28/2016 5:34 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 02:28:29 -0500, wrote:

... and it becomes fact

Rachel Mad Cow did a show on MSNBC tonight and a lot of it was
perfectly true. Lead is there, it is bad, it came from the pipes and
the pipes should have been replaced 50 years ago when Flint was
rolling in auto money.
It is true that they were damaged because the Flint water district did
not add the SAME corrosion inhibitors that Detroit uses.

Where the lies start is when they start laying blame.
#1 it was not the state that decided to switch from Detroit water to
the Flint River
The fact is the Detroit water district terminated their contract with
Flint in retaliation for Genesee County building a competing pipeline.
#2 It was not the state that decided to go with the Genesee county
water system, (something they completely ignored) it was the city
council and Rachel admitted it was a 7-1 vote.

The unanswered question was, WHO decided not to add the corrosion
inhibitor that Detroit uses? It certainly wasn't money since that
would only be about $100 a day for the whole city. That pretty much
had to be the Flint water district manager or his staff.
Why wasn't there anyone in the water district who knew that water
without the corrosion inhibitor would cause this problem?

I have posted the water reports from Flint and Detroit here already
and there is not any significant difference in pH or even the salt
they are talking about (~4ppm)

They did say there were failures at every level of government, right
before they said it was all the governor's fault. I bet if Grandholm
was still there they would have found a way to blame it on Bush.

I assume they now want the federal government to spend the billions to
replace all of that pipe. Are we going to do it in every other city
that used lead pipe?
I guess a $1000 surtax on everyone's 1040 would cover it.


I'll pretend to be Harry...

"I don't care. It's the Republican Governor's fault. He probably put in the lead
pipes to begin with, and was using the inhibitor money to pay off the Flint water
department folks to keep their mouths shut."
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

If you really want to fake a Harry, blame it on Cheeny or Bush
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,650
Default Tell a lie often enough

On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 05:34:31 -0500, John H.
wrote:

I assume they now want the federal government to spend the billions to
replace all of that pipe. Are we going to do it in every other city
that used lead pipe?
I guess a $1000 surtax on everyone's 1040 would cover it.


I'll pretend to be Harry...

"I don't care. It's the Republican Governor's fault. He probably put in the lead
pipes to begin with, and was using the inhibitor money to pay off the Flint water
department folks to keep their mouths shut."


===

If you want to play Harry you need to do it right.

"It's the conservatrash repugnicant governor's fault. He conspired
with the crooked banksters to install the lead pipes as a way of
poisoning the poor democratic party residents."
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default Tell a lie often enough

On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:18:37 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 1/28/2016 5:34 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 02:28:29 -0500, wrote:

... and it becomes fact

Rachel Mad Cow did a show on MSNBC tonight and a lot of it was
perfectly true. Lead is there, it is bad, it came from the pipes and
the pipes should have been replaced 50 years ago when Flint was
rolling in auto money.
It is true that they were damaged because the Flint water district did
not add the SAME corrosion inhibitors that Detroit uses.

Where the lies start is when they start laying blame.
#1 it was not the state that decided to switch from Detroit water to
the Flint River
The fact is the Detroit water district terminated their contract with
Flint in retaliation for Genesee County building a competing pipeline.
#2 It was not the state that decided to go with the Genesee county
water system, (something they completely ignored) it was the city
council and Rachel admitted it was a 7-1 vote.

The unanswered question was, WHO decided not to add the corrosion
inhibitor that Detroit uses? It certainly wasn't money since that
would only be about $100 a day for the whole city. That pretty much
had to be the Flint water district manager or his staff.
Why wasn't there anyone in the water district who knew that water
without the corrosion inhibitor would cause this problem?

I have posted the water reports from Flint and Detroit here already
and there is not any significant difference in pH or even the salt
they are talking about (~4ppm)

They did say there were failures at every level of government, right
before they said it was all the governor's fault. I bet if Grandholm
was still there they would have found a way to blame it on Bush.

I assume they now want the federal government to spend the billions to
replace all of that pipe. Are we going to do it in every other city
that used lead pipe?
I guess a $1000 surtax on everyone's 1040 would cover it.


I'll pretend to be Harry...

"I don't care. It's the Republican Governor's fault. He probably put in the lead
pipes to begin with, and was using the inhibitor money to pay off the Flint water
department folks to keep their mouths shut."
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

If you really want to fake a Harry, blame it on Cheeny or Bush


It's their fault that the murder rates in Flint and Detroit are so high.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default Tell a lie often enough

On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 05:34:31 -0500, John H.
wrote:

I assume they now want the federal government to spend the billions to
replace all of that pipe. Are we going to do it in every other city
that used lead pipe?
I guess a $1000 surtax on everyone's 1040 would cover it.


I'll pretend to be Harry...

"I don't care. It's the Republican Governor's fault. He probably put in the lead
pipes to begin with, and was using the inhibitor money to pay off the Flint water
department folks to keep their mouths shut."


===

If you want to play Harry you need to do it right.

"It's the conservatrash repugnicant governor's fault. He conspired
with the crooked banksters to install the lead pipes as a way of
poisoning the poor democratic party residents."
.....

Any room in there for the "rightie-Christian-fumdies?"
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017