| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 1/7/16 10:57 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. I think I agree...that being able to press an armed revolt against the government is not a very good reason for the Second Amendment. It's too bad we let the genie out of the bottle in regard to civilian ownership of large-cap semi-auto rifles and pistols and magazines, because, whether you are hunting or defending yourself, there's really no good reason for anything beyond the average hunting rifle, shotgun, or revolver, and there are plenty of hammerless, pocketable revolvers available that'll handle substantial rounds. My favorite by far firearms to shoot are my six shooter, and my lever action and bolt action rifles. Any of them are suitable for defensive use or even hunting small game. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:32:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/7/16 10:57 AM, wrote: On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. I think I agree...that being able to press an armed revolt against the government is not a very good reason for the Second Amendment. It's too bad we let the genie out of the bottle in regard to civilian ownership of large-cap semi-auto rifles and pistols and magazines, because, whether you are hunting or defending yourself, there's really no good reason for anything beyond the average hunting rifle, shotgun, or revolver, and there are plenty of hammerless, pocketable revolvers available that'll handle substantial rounds. My favorite by far firearms to shoot are my six shooter, and my lever action and bolt action rifles. Any of them are suitable for defensive use or even hunting small game. Ah, so now that you've sold your 'assault rifle' of which you were extremely proud, civilians shouldn't be allowed to own them. Why should your preferences have any more value than someone else's preferences? Only a few weeks ago your preference was the 'assault rifle'. Heaven knows you made enough posts about it. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 1/7/16 1:24 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:32:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/7/16 10:57 AM, wrote: On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. I think I agree...that being able to press an armed revolt against the government is not a very good reason for the Second Amendment. It's too bad we let the genie out of the bottle in regard to civilian ownership of large-cap semi-auto rifles and pistols and magazines, because, whether you are hunting or defending yourself, there's really no good reason for anything beyond the average hunting rifle, shotgun, or revolver, and there are plenty of hammerless, pocketable revolvers available that'll handle substantial rounds. My favorite by far firearms to shoot are my six shooter, and my lever action and bolt action rifles. Any of them are suitable for defensive use or even hunting small game. Ah, so now that you've sold your 'assault rifle' of which you were extremely proud, civilians shouldn't be allowed to own them. Why should your preferences have any more value than someone else's preferences? Only a few weeks ago your preference was the 'assault rifle'. Heaven knows you made enough posts about it. -- Ban idiots, not guns! How would you possibly know what my "preference" was? I owned an AR15 and I sold it. It was a nice rifle, for sure, but I wouldn't mind not being able to buy a semi-auto firearm of any kind if it helped save lives. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article 5e2t8b54rsb2l98a8pqraf5gj1iiqdf5a9@
4ax.com, says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. You need to get your "bull**** meter" tuned up. And quit lying. Who said anything about a "revolt?" You should keep your fantasies to yourself. Who says I'm anti-gun? You, who wants every wacko to carry a piece? Get a grip. The 2nd provides protection from tyrannical government. I suspect Abe Lincoln's had that in mind when he said "by the people, for the people, of the people." So far it's working. You should read it. The difference between you and I is I'm not a gun nut. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:30:50 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote: In article 5e2t8b54rsb2l98a8pqraf5gj1iiqdf5a9@ 4ax.com, says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. You need to get your "bull**** meter" tuned up. And quit lying. Who said anything about a "revolt?" OK explain how the second amendment is insurance against the government if it isn't a revolt? You just talk gibberish and expect us to believe you. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 1/8/2016 2:56 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:30:50 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article 5e2t8b54rsb2l98a8pqraf5gj1iiqdf5a9@ 4ax.com, says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. You need to get your "bull**** meter" tuned up. And quit lying. Who said anything about a "revolt?" OK explain how the second amendment is insurance against the government if it isn't a revolt? You just talk gibberish and expect us to believe you. I don't think his mumbo jumbo is meant to be believed. He's just riling against conservatives like any die hard liberal would do. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Pistol grips | General | |||
| My Custom CZ Pistol... | General | |||
| Pistol case | General | |||
| Soft Pistol Cases | General | |||
| CZ Pistol Vids | General | |||